Assessing Turkey’s New Global Governance Strategies: The G20 Example

  • Emel Parlar Dal
  • Ali Murat Kurşun


This chapter attempts to scrutinize Turkey first as a status-seeking country and second as a G20 middle power with different expectations in terms of geopolitics, economics, and foreign policy. Third, this study attempts to examine Turkey’s performance in the G20 as a middle power state in comparison with its peers in the same group by the use of G20 compliance data set from 2008 to 2013 and the final compliance reports of the 2014–2016 summits. Here, the main objective is to grasp the extent to which Turkey has met its commitments and in which areas between 2009 and 2016 compared with its middle power peers. This analysis also engenders an assessment of the main characteristics of Turkey’s changing priorities, preferences, and adjustments in the G20’s institutional sub-system. In the final analysis, the chapter concludes that despite its lack of compliance with G20 summit commitments compared with other G20 middle power members, Turkey’s bridging status between the North and the South grants it a special role as both an institutionally accommodating and challenging actor.


  1. “G20 Annual Summit Final Compliance Reports.” n.d. G20 Information Center. Accessed 5 Dec 2017.
  2. “Turkish G20 Presidency Priorities for 2015.” 2014. 2015 G20 Turkey.
  3. Arkan, Zeynep, and Müge Kınacıoğlu. 2016. Enabling ‘Ambitious Activism’: Davutoğlu’s Vision of a New Foreign Policy Identity for Turkey. Turkish Studies 17 (3): 381–405. Scholar
  4. Al, Arzu. 2015. Politika-Ekonomi Kesişmesi: Yeni Bir Bilim Dalı Olarak Uluslararası Politik Ekonomi. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2 (1): 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, Andrew F. 2013. Squeezed or Revitalised? Middle Powers, the G20 and the Evolution of Global Governance. Third World Quarterly 34 (6): 963–984. Scholar
  6. ———. 2014. The G20 and Contested Global Governance: BRICS, Middle Powers and Small States. Caribbean Journal of International Relations and Diplomacy 2 (3).
  7. Cooper, Andrew F., and Vincent Pouliot. 2015. How Much Is Global Governance Changing? The G20 as International Practice. Cooperation and Conflict 50 (3): 334–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Downie, Christian. 2017. One in 20: The G20, Middle Powers and Global Governance Reform. Third World Quarterly 38 (7): 1493–1510. Scholar
  9. Hurrell, Andrew. 2009. Rising Powers and the Question of Status in International Society. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the ISA’s 50th Annual Convention “Exploring the Past, Anticipating the Future”, New York Marriott Marquis, New York, February 15.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, Bruce. 2016. China’s G-20 Presidency: Where Geopolitics Meets Global Governance. Brookings (blog), April 12, 2016.
  11. Kirton, John. 2014. The G20 System Still Works: Better Than Ever. Caribbean Journal of International Relations and Diplomacy 2 (3).
  12. Larionova, Marina, Mark Rakhmangulov, Elizaveta Safonkina, Andrei Sakharov, and Andrey Shelepov. 2017. G20 Priorities and Decisions under Turkey’s 2015 Presidency: Implementation, Inclusiveness and Investment for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth. International Organisations Research Journal 12 (1): 148–173. Scholar
  13. Luckhurst, Jonathan. 2016. G20 Since the Global Crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. Google Scholar
  14. Öniş, Ziya. 2014. Turkey and the Arab Revolutions: Boundaries of Regional Power Influence in a Turbulent Middle East. Mediterranean Politics 19 (2): 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Öniş, Ziya, and Mustafa Kutlay. 2013. Rising Powers in a Changing Global Order: The Political Economy of Turkey in the Age of BRICS. Third World Quarterly 34 (8): 1409–1426. Scholar
  16. ———. 2016. The Dynamics of Emerging Middle-Power Influence in Regional and Global Governance: The Paradoxical Case of Turkey. Australian Journal of International Affairs 71 (2): 1–20.
  17. Parlar Dal, Emel. 2014. On Turkey’s Trail as a “Rising Middle Power” in the Network of Global Governance: Preferences, Capabilities, and Strategies. Perceptions 19 (4): 107–136.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2016. Conceptualising and Testing the ‘Emerging Regional Power’ of Turkey in the Shifting International Order. Third World Quarterly 37 (8): 1425–1453. Scholar
  19. ———. 2017. Impact of the Transnationalization of the Syrian Civil War on Turkey: Conflict Spillover Cases of ISIS and PYD-YPG/PKK. Cambridge Review of International Affairs: 1–25.
  20. ———. 2018. Profiling Middle Powers in Global Governance and the Turkish Case: An Introduction. In Middle Powers in Global Governance: The Rise of Turkey. London: Palgrave Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Parlar Dal, Emel, and Ali Murat Kurşun. 2016. Assessing Turkey’s Middle Power Foreign Policy in MIKTA: Goals, Means, and Impact. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 71 (4): 608–629. Scholar
  22. Parlar Dal, Emel, and Ali Murat Kurşun. 2018. Turkey in the UN Funding System: A Comparative Analysis with the BRICS Countries (2010–2013). In Middle Powers in Global Governance: The Rise of Turkey. London: Palgrave Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  23. Paul, T.V., Deborah Welch Larson, and William Curti Wohlforth, eds. 2014. Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emel Parlar Dal
    • 1
  • Ali Murat Kurşun
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Political SciencesMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations