Advertisement

How Do We Respond? Embodied Vulnerability and Forms of Responsiveness

  • Danielle Petherbridge
Chapter
Part of the Breaking Feminist Waves book series (BFW)

Abstract

The notion of vulnerability has become a central category through which feminist philosophers such as Judith Butler and Adriana Cavarero have sought to examine the complexity of embodied interdependence and corporeal openness to others. In this chapter, I engage with J.M. Coetzee’s texts The Lives of Animals and Waiting for the Barbarians to explore the intricacies of embodied vulnerability and bring these texts into dialogue with the philosophical approaches of Stanley Cavell, Cora Diamond and Bernard Waldenfels. The chapter examines the relation between embodied knowledge, vulnerability and responsiveness, and raises questions about the kinds of responses we are called to make in the face of the other’s vulnerability.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Joel. 2014. Autonomy and Vulnerability Entwined. In Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy, ed. C. Mackenzie, W. Rogers, and S. Dodds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2010. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, Judith, Zeynep Gambetti, and Leticia Sabsay. 2016. Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavarero, Adriana. 2009. Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence. Trans. W. McCuaig. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cavell, Stanley. 1976. Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge/London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coetzee, J.M. 1999. The Lives of Animals. Edited and Introduced by Amy Gutmann with responses by Marjorie Garber, Peter Singer, Wendy Doniger, Barbara Smuts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2004. Waiting for the Barbarians. London: Vintage Books. (1980).Google Scholar
  9. Das, Venna. 2016. The Boundaries of the ‘We’: Cruelty, Responsibility and Forms of Life. Critical Horizons 17 (2): 168–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diamond, Cora. 2003. The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy. Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas 1 (2): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrarese, Estelle. 2018. Vulnerability. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  12. Franke, William. 2015. Acknowledging Unknowing: Stanley Cavell and the Philosophical Criticism of Literature. Philosophy and Literature 39 (1): 248–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garrau, Marie. 2012. On Corine Pelluchon’s. Éléments pour une éthique de la vulnérabilité: Les hommes, les animaux, la nature, booksandideas.net. (originally in laviedesidees.fr). Trans. J. Zvesper, 22 June 2012.
  14. Gilson, Erinn. 2011. Vulnerability, Ignorance and Oppression. Hypatia 26 (2): 308–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kompridis, Nikolas. 2013. Recognition and Receptivity: Forms of Narrative Response in the Lives of the Animals We Are. New Literary History 44 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
  16. Mills, Catherine. 2007. Normative Violence, Vulnerability, and Responsibility. Differences 18 (2): 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murphy, Ann. 2012. Violence and the Philosophical Imaginary. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  18. Perpich, Diane. 2006. Moral Blind Spots and Ethical Appeals: A Response to Bernhard Waldenfels. In Interrogating Ethics: Embodying the Good in Merleau-Ponty, ed. James Hatley, Janice McLane, and Christian Diehm. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Petherbridge, Danielle. 2016. What’s Critical About Vulnerability? Rethinking Interdependence, Recognition and Power. Hypatia 31 (3): 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 2006. Responsivity of the Body: Traces of the Other in Merleau-Ponty’s Theory of Body and Flesh. In Interrogating Ethics: Embodying the Good in Merleau-Ponty, ed. James Hatley, Janice McLane, and Christian Diehm. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danielle Petherbridge
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PhilosophyUniversity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations