Advertisement

Thermodynamic Study of Ga Extraction for Trace Element Analysis by ICP-MS

  • Kyungjean MinEmail author
  • David Johnson
  • Kevin Trumble
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) has a detection limit of sub-parts-per-trillion (ppt) level. However, it was found the detection limit increased to ~10 ppb for the analysis of impurities in ultra-pure Ga of 7 N (99.99999%) and 8 N (99.999999%) by ICP-MS due to matrix-induced interference. By extracting Ga during sample preparation, matrix-induced interference can be reduced and a lower detection limit can be achieved in the ICP-MS measurement. The dextran-based resin Sephadex G-25 can chemically separate the impurity Ge from Ga. The hydroxide complexes of Ga and Ge are adsorbed on Sephadex G-25 and desorbed into acid depending on pH. Viability of Ge separation from Ga by pH change was evaluated by thermodynamic calculation of the hydrolysis reaction of Ga and Ge. The distributions of Ga-hydroxide species and Ge-hydroxide species in 0.64 M HNO3 were derived by numerical calculation for thermodynamic equilibrium. The effect of presence of medium and ionic strength in aqueous solutions on hydrolysis reaction was evaluated. From the derived speciation diagram for Ga and Ge hydrolysis reactions, the optimal pH range to separate impurity Ge from Ga for ICP-MS sample preparation was investigated.

Keywords

Gallium Separation ICP-MS Speciation diagram Hydrolysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support for this research from the W. M. Keck Foundation is gratefully acknowledged (Grant No. 52445). The authors also would like to thank the ultra-pure GaAs Keck Project team members at Purdue University.

References

  1. 1.
    Manfra MJ (2014) Molecular beam epitaxy of ultra-high-quality AlGaAs/GaAs Heterostructures: enabling physics in low-dimensional electronic systems. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys 5:347–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hwang EH, Das Sarma S (2008) Limit to two-dimensional mobility in modulation-doped GaAs quantum structures: how to achieve a mobility of 100 million. Phys Rev B. 77:235437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Min K (2014) Analysis of high-purity of Ga by ICP-MS, MS thesis, Purdue UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Min K, Johnson D, Trumble R, unpublished workGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rafaeloff R (1971) Separation of gallium from group III elements, Germanium, Copper, Arsenic, and Iron. Anal Chem 43(2):272–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitzsimmons J, Mausner L (2015) Evaluation of materials for separation of germanium from gallium, zinc and cobalt. J Chem Chem Eng 9:462–467Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fitzsimmons J, Mausner L (2015) Development of a production scale purification of Ge-68 from irradiated Ga metal. Radiochim Acta 103(2):117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harada A, Tarutani T (1988) Spectrophotometric determination of germanium in rocks after selective adsorption on Sephadex gel. Anal Chim Acta 209:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baes Jr. CF, Mesmer RE, (1976) The hydrolysis of cations. WileyGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown PL, Ekberg C, (2016) Hydrolysis of metal ions. Wiley-VCHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wood SA, Samson IM (2006) The aqueous geochemistry of gallium, germanium, indium and scandium. Ore Geol Rev 28(1):57–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations