Abstract
This chapter deals with a specific case study: the Framework Plan for Historical Centre Recovery of Cagliari. The multidisciplinary approach is applied to valorize the contribution of the fields of major interest in support of the development of the urban planning discipline: environmental history, urban sociology, historical-morphological analysis based on the archeology of the preexistences and on historical topography. All these disciplines somehow imply a decoding of their epistemological codes and of their technical instrumentation which can serve as an equipment of the cultural device useful for the analysis to carry out in the field of the territorial and urban planning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The dimensions of the landscape themselves anticipate the complexity of the landscape issue.
- 2.
The situated goods are considered as goods in which the measure of their value would decrease if they were moved. It is J. Levy’s expression “Il ya du monde ici”.
- 3.
According to Mumford the medieval archetype of the city is that one of Ambrogio Lorenzetti’s.
- 4.
Cfr. Directive 2001/42/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programs on the environment.
- 5.
Some important considerations can be found in the Carte per il Patrimonio: International Charter for the Conservation and the Restoration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Charter) Venice 1964. La Carta UNESCO: Recommendation for the Protection of Movable Cultural Property, General Conference—20th Session, Paris 1978.
- 6.
In general cfr. the C.A.R.T. project for the Emilia-Romagna.
- 7.
For the United Kingdom, the fundamental documents are: The Ancient Monument and Archaeological Areas Act of 1979, overcome by the Planning Police Guidance 16: Archaeology and Planning (PPG16, 1990). The main legislation is the National Heritage Act 1984, Local Government Act 1985, Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. The Practices can be distinguished as follows: Planning Police Guidance 16: Archaeology and Planning (PPG16) 1990, Planning Police Guidance 15: Planning and Historic Environment (PPG15) 1994. Also, English Heritage Urban Archaeological databases programs and York City Council 1992, in: www.york.gov.uk/leisure/local_history_and_heritage/archaeology/surveys/arch_summ/. For France see B. Boissavit Camus, “Les services territoriaux, une alternative pou l’archéologie urbaine”, in: Nouvelles de l’archéologie 71, 1988, pp. 52–53; AA.VV., Conserver ou détruire les vestiges archéologiques; la carte archéologique; l’archéologie dans l’aménagement du territoire, Actes des quatrième et cinquième rencontres nazionales de l’archéologie (Montpellier avril 1992 et Marseille octobre 1993), Atelier du patrimoine de la ville de Marsille, De Boccard-Diffusion, Document d’archéologie, d’histoire et d’architecture, 3; Documents d’evaluation du patrimoine archéologique urbain, Centre National d’Archeologie urbaine, DEPAU, Tours; H. Galinié, “La gestion des Archives du sol en ville”, in Jornadas Internacionales de Arqueologia de Intervencion (Donostia 1991), Bilbao 1992, pp. 137–164; pp. 23–36. For Greece cfr. AA.VV., The city beneath the city. Antiquities from the Metropolitan Raiway Excavation, Athens, Kapon Ed. 2000.
- 8.
A consistent disciplinary support in the debate on the requalification of the historical urban heritage takes place in parallel, leading to advanced reflections, from the historicism to Giovannoni.
- 9.
See the world of perception in K. Lynch.
- 10.
The methods of the Forma Italiae, Ancient City in Italy, Forma Maris Antiqui, Tabula Imperii Romani. Codified methods guaranteeing the comparison and juxtaposition of the data that today represent the best in innovation for what concerns the field of the archeological science in relation to the urban and territorial analysis for the periods of the antiquity and Middle Ages.
- 11.
The note is by Antonio Cederna.
- 12.
The reasons which led to the decision of drafting, less than 4 years from the adoption of the Consolidating Statute, a “new” code for the cultural heritage, are formally expressed by art. 10 of the Law 137 of 2002, synthesizable as follows: to adapt the regulation on the cultural and environmental heritage to articles 117 and 118 of the Constitution, modified with the reform of its Title V, to the communitarian regulation and to the international agreements; to improve the effectiveness of the actions concerning goods and cultural activities; to simplify and abbreviate the procedures; to update the tools of individuation, conservation and protection of the cultural goods.
- 13.
Cfr. Legislative Decree 22 January 2004, n. 42, Part I. General Dispositions art. 3. It has been widely noticed that it is unclear where the protection entrusted to the state ends and where the enhancement, competence of the regions, begins, and how this fact generates conflicts and problems.
- 14.
Cfr. “Rapporto sistematico annuale 2005 sulle attività culturali delle Amministrazioni pubbliche” published as supplement to the Giornale dell’Arte, anno XXIII, n.243, maggio 2005, Torino Umberto Allemandi & C.
References
AA.VV. (1984) Archéologie et aménagement. Rapport du Colloque de Florence, 10/22-25, Patrimoine architectural. Rapports et études 5, Conseil de l’Europe, Strasburg, passim
AA.VV. (2003) Il mondo e i luoghi. Geografie dell’identità e del cambiamento. In: De Matteis G, Ferlaino F (eds) IRES Istituto di Ricerche economico-sociali del Piemonte, Torino, Grafica ESSE, pp 59–63
Amorosino S (2004) comment on article 145 of the Code of the cultural and landscape heritage. In: AA.VV. Il Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio (by Cammelli M), Bologna, Il Mulino, p 569
Argan GC, Fagiolo M (1972) Premessa all’arte italiana IV. I problemi della città. La struttura organica. In: AA.VV. Storia d’Italia I. I caratteri originali, Torino, Einaudi, pp 772–774
Ashworth G, Howard P (1999) European Heritage: Planning and Management. Intellected Books, Exeter
Barrero Rodriguez C (1990) La ordenación juridica del Patrimonio Histórico, Madrid
Bermejo Latre JL (2002) La pianificazione del paesaggio. I piani paesistici e la nuova tutela delle risorse naturali, Maggioli, Milano, p 11
Brighi O, Biscaglia AM (2001) Urbanistica e archeologia. In: AA.VV., Dalla Carta del rischio archeologico di Cesena alla tutela preventiva urbana in Europa, (by Gelichi S), Comune di Cesena. Assessorato all’Urbanistica. Settore Programmazione urbanistica, Firenze, All’Insegna del Giglio, pp 93–94
Carta M (1999) L’armatura culturale del territorio. Il patrimonio culturale come matrice di identità e strumento di sviluppo. Franco Angeli, Milano
Clementi A (2005) Vent’anni dopo Memorabilia. In: Territorio 32, p 12
Conforto ML (2002), Roma, la città del futuro nella lezione della storia: modelli tipologici e strategie di intervento. In: AA.VV., Archeologia urbana e progetto di architettura, Gangemi, Roma, pp 133–144
Deplano G (1999) Piano per il Recupero del Centro Storico di Cagliari (unpublished)
Deplano G (2009) Cagliari: dalla città murata alla città dei piani. In: Piroddi E, Cappuccitti A (eds) il Nuovo Manuale di Urbanistica, Gruppo Mancosu Editore srl., Roma, pp B542–B563
Dockès P (1969) Lo spazio nel pensiero economico dal XVI al XVIII secolo. Mondadori, Milano
Febvre L (1953) Studi su riforma e Rinascimento, in particular, La terra e l’evoluzione umana, Torino, Einaudi 1966, p 594. Braudel F, Civiltà e imperi del Mediterraneo nell’età di Filippo II, Torino, Einaudi, p 5
Finocchiaro E (1999) Città in trasformazione. Le logiche di sviluppo della metropoli contemporanea. Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 138–149
Gambi L (1972) I valori storici dei quadri ambientali. In: AA.VV. Storia d’Italia I. I caratteri originali, Torino, Einaudi, pp 5–60
Gambino R (2002) Maniere di intendere il paesaggio. In: AA.VV. Interpretazioni di paesaggio (by Clementi A), Roma, Meltemi, pp 54–79
Garzillo E (2002) Il restauro. L’insoddisfazione del nuovo. In: Mattei E (ed) Equilibri. Rivista per lo sviluppo sostenibile 1/2002. La città storica del futuro, Bologna, Il Mulino Fondazione, pp 15–21
Hughes JD (2002) An environmental history of the world. humankind’s changing role in the community of life. Routledge, London-New-York
Indovina F (1999) La città prossima futura: un nuovo protagonismo istituzionale. In: AA.VV. I futuri della città: Mutamenti, nuovi oggetti e progetti, Franco Angeli, Milano
Lozato Giotard JP (1999) Geografia del turismo. Dallo spazio visitato allo spazio consumato, Franco Angeli, Milano
Magnier A, Russo P (2002) Sociologia dei sistemi urbani, Milano, Il Mulino, p 8
Mas Guindal La Farga A (1993) Visión de la ciudad histórica. In: Urbanismo y Conservación de Ciudades Patrimonio de la Humanidad, Mérida, pp 65–71
McNamon FP, Hatton A (2000) Cultural resource management in contemporary society: perspectives on managing and presenting the past, Routledge, London
Meogrossi P (1999) Strategie per il parco archeologico di Roma. Dal centro storico all’Appia antica. In: AA.VV., Recuperar la memoria urbana. L’arqueologia en la rehabilitaciò de les ciutats històriques, Tarragona 27 i 28 de febrer de 1997 (by Mar R, Ruiz de Arbulo J, Subias E), 2 Documents d’Arqueologia Clàssica Tarragona 1999, pp 41–45
Neri Sernieri S (2005) Incorporare la natura. Storie ambientali del Novecento, Carocci, Roma, p 29
Nigro GL (1999) Piani regolatori generali di ultima generazione. Argomenti di riflessione e letture di piani locali, Gangemi, Roma, p 13
Park R, Burgess W, McKenzie RD (1999) La città, Torino. Edizioni di comunità (trans: Rauty R)
Piroddi E (1999) Le forme del piano urbanistico, Franco Angeli, Milano, p 8
Roman A (2000) Qualities of historic towns to be preserved—according to the charter and besides it. In: AA.VV., Algreen Ussing G, Bek L, Bo Frandsen S, Hansen JS (eds) Urban space and urban conservation as an aesthetic problem. Lectures presented at the international conference in Rome, October 23rd–26th, 1997, Roma, L’Erma di Bretschneider, pp 13–17
Salvemini B (1997) Luoghi di antico regime. La costruzione dello spazio nella storiografia francese. Storica 9:7–62
Secchi B (2000) Prima lezione di urbanistica. Laterza p, Bari, p 141
Terán F (1982) Planeamiento urbano en la España contemporánea (1900–1980), Madrid
Torres M (2000) Luoghi magnetici. spazi pubblici nella città moderna e contemporanea, Franco Angeli, Milano
Valle G (1992) Archeologia e pianificazione. Il PGR come strumento di tutela e valorizzazione del patrimonio archeologico: l’esempio di Pavia. In: AA.VV., Nuove ricerche archeologiche in provincia di Pavia, Acts by Pearce M, II convegno di Casteggio—14 ottobre 1990, Casteggio, pp 89–98
Vittorini MA (1999) Luogo, segni e memorie nella costruzione del piano urbanistico. In: AA.VV., Piani regolatori generali di ultima generazione. Argomenti di riflessione e letture di piani locali (by Nigro GL), Roma, Gangemi, pp 29–40
Voghera A (2005) Politiche di tutela e innovazione dei paesaggi in Europa. In: Archivio di studi urbani e regionali, n 83
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colavitti, A.M. (2018). The New Interdisciplinary Frontiers. In: Urban Heritage Management. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72338-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72338-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72337-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72338-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)