Skip to main content

Development of a Multidisciplinary Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 895 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

This chapter argues that a multidisciplinary approach leads to a constructive comparison between the legacy of the historical-memorial processes immanent to the city and territory and the current visible forms of the landscape, which are the result of such processes. From silent to speaking territory which is seat of collective identity, starring role of the process of identification of a community, able to show its vocations and to direct its transformations. In such territory, there’s the city. From the Mediterranean sacred city inside the temenos or sacred enclosure, which differentiated what is interior (sacre) and external (heathen) to the enclosure, to the current city which is the result of historical stratification and must be open to the territory and its transformations. A multidisciplinary approach is a must be blueprint to new urban planning, the only one able to intercept contemporary complexity and to canalize it in the urban project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The adjective is used here not to indicate that the city never changes but can be seen as a sort of model-idealtypus to which always refer. This seems to have happened mostly in three great moments of human history, those mentioned in the text.

  2. 2.

    In the historical-sociologic analysis it is not possible to prescind from the consideration of Weber’s city, the one that S. Momigliano defined as Max Weber’s masterpiece, in A. Momigliano (Momigliano 1984); according to Weber, L. Capogrossi Colognesi’s work is fundamental (Capogrossi Colognesi 1997). The interest in the city as political institution is highlighted in the essay about the city, published posthumous in Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik (1920–21) and then collected in Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Weber individuates in the Western city a political model of city unseen elsewhere, to which he associates the ancient polis and the medieval town. Weber’s analysis had a great fortune: his comparative vision has been highly quoted. For a useful synthesis, see Pietro Rossi’s essay “La città come impostazione politica: l’impostazione della ricerca” (AA.VV. 2001b).

  3. 3.

    Already mentioned before for La cité antique.

  4. 4.

    Like V. Arangio Ruiz’s one on the aristocratic theory.

  5. 5.

    Worth remembering G. Glotz’s work (Glotz 1928), for the French school; G. Busolt and H. Swoboda (Busolt and Swoboda 19201926) for the German school; J. Burckhardt, Martin, Wycherley, and others on the definition of the public space as archaeological clue of the formation of the city.

  6. 6.

    See. E. Meyer and V. Ehremberg’s writings from 1937 to 1974, in particular “Quando è nata la polis?” (AA. VV. 1980). K. Marx’s analysis on the ancient city deserves a different discourse. He individuated in the development of the job sharing and in the opposition between city and countryside one of the essential points for the development of the urban organism.

  7. 7.

    See for example, the case of the urban development plan for Rome and the polemics around the figure of G. Giovannoni. “La definizione del profilo dell’architetto totale è di G. Zucconi” (Giovannoni 1977).

  8. 8.

    The case of the public competition for the Land Use Plan for the “Greater Paris”, in 1919, by Jaussely, Export, Sellier, focused on the internal restoration of the city, the enhancement of the area of the fortifications (this will be a topic also in the new urban development plan for Rome by Marcelloni of 2003), and the planning of peripheral residential quarters that refer to the model of the garden city.

  9. 9.

    France established the departmental public offices for economic dwellings, thanks to the Bonnevay Law.

  10. 10.

    We share D. Calabi’s opinion published in Storia dell’urbanistica europea, op. cit., p. 219.

  11. 11.

    Also defined as transnational city by the exchanges, transactions, precisely, that continually happen between the contemporaneous metropolises.

  12. 12.

    See the enlightening studies by M. Castells, D. Harvey, S. Sassen, R. Sennett.

  13. 13.

    C. Macchi Cassia noted in a 1991 work that “the discourse about the correct use of the historical resources becomes an integral, fundamental part of the urban planning.”

  14. 14.

    Some of these theories and positions have been already highlighted synthetically in the previous chapters.

  15. 15.

    See the well-known definition by Lucio Gambi, in Storia d’Italia published for the editions of Einaudi.

  16. 16.

    On the theme of the communication in the urban planning discipline see the recent G. Caudo, A. L. Palazzo (Caudo and Palazzo 2000), concerning the communication of plans and projects, in accordance with the theory by P. Healey.

  17. 17.

    Clementi insisted on such a point for its consequences on the definition of identity, but even more for the study of the most appropriate way of governing the urban transformations.

  18. 18.

    For example, the Legge Regionale della Toscana (Tuscany Regional Law) n. 5 of 1995 referred to that from the normative point of view and took advantage of the method and objectives of the Territorial and Coordination Plan of the Florence Province and, above all, of the preliminary studies the Law n. 142/1990 is based on.

  19. 19.

    An updated list of the minor centers and their role in the different territorial systems is contained in L. Bellicini (Bellicini 1994); Cfr. the classic work of L. Gambi (1972).

  20. 20.

    See also the reflections developed in the same occasions by G. Macchi Cassia, G. Longhi, P. Falini, and A. Terranova.

  21. 21.

    La Sperimentazione dei Laboratori per il Recupero dei Centri Storici (the Experimentation of the Laboratories for the Historical Centers Recovery), with reference to art.7 “Direttive per i Centri Storici” (Directives for the Historical Centres) of the Regional Law 45/1989, has been possible thanks to the Convention between R.A.S.-Regione Autonoma della Sardegna (Assessorato Enti Locali, Finanze e Urbanistica) and the Università degli Studi di Cagliari (Dipartimento di Ingegneria del Territorio), under G. Deplano’s scientific direction.

  22. 22.

    On the building of a territory of excellency, see the studies by the Raggruppamento CIRIEC-Consorzio Sudgest-Demos SCPA, on behalf of the Amministrazione provinciale di Sassari (Provincial Administration of Sassari).

  23. 23.

    On the possibilities offered by the artistic creativity of projecting, around the monuments and the public space of public use, new forms of identity and the surplus value of art, see the great volume (AA.VV. 2004).

References

  • AA.VV. (1980) La città antica, pp. 109–129: translation of “When did the Polis Rise? J Hellenic Stud LVII, 1937, drawn on by Polis und Imperium, Zürich-Stuttgart 1965, pp 83–97

    Google Scholar 

  • AA.VV. (1991) Le aree metropolitane in Europa. Rassegna di alcune esperienze, Firenze, IRPET, Istituto Regionale per la programmazione economica della Toscana (Regional Institute for the Economic Planning of Tuscany), pp 9–11

    Google Scholar 

  • AA.VV. (2001a) Modelli di città. In: Rossi P (ed) Strutture e funzioni politiche, Torino, Edizioni di Comunità, 2a edn, p XVIII, pp 5–27

    Google Scholar 

  • AA.VV. (2001b) Le città del Mediterraneo, Atti del forum internazionale di studio “Le città del Mediterraneo. In: Bianchi A, Carrà N, Sardo A (eds) Reggio Calabria 3–4-5 giugno 1998 Reggio Calabria, Jason Editrice

    Google Scholar 

  • AA.VV. (2004) Creazione contemporanea. In: De Luca M, Gennari Santori F, Pietromarchi B, Trimarchi M (eds) Arte, società e territorio tra pubblico e privato. Roma, Luca Sossella Editore. In particular A. Annechiarico, Politiche pubbliche e processi artistici: il caso Zingonia, pp 165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Thrift N (2005) Città. Ripensare la dimensione urbana, Milano, Il Mulino, 2005 (Italian translation by F. Santandrea, published by A. Mela)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arangio Ruiz A (1980) Le genti e la città. In: AA.VV., Ampolo C (ed) La città antica. Guida storica e critica, Bari, Laterza

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckermann W (1995) Small is stupid. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore E (2001) Il rimodellamento dello spazio urbano. Arte e tecnica della trasformazione, Roma, Gangemi

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellicini L (1994) Il disegno minuto del territorio. Elementi per una descrizione dell’insediamento minore in Italia e in Europa. In: Savarese N, Valentino PA (eds) Progettare il passato. Centri storici minori ambientali diffusi, Progetti Museali Editore

    Google Scholar 

  • Benevolo L (1993) La città nella storia d’Europa, Bari, Laterza, p 163, 203

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin W (1976) Angelus Novus, Torino, Einaudi 1976, 1st, edn (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Busolt G, Swoboda H (1920–1926) Griechische Staatskunde, München I-II

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabi D (2004) Storia dell’urbanistica europea. Milano, Mondadori 2004:110

    Google Scholar 

  • Capogrossi Colognesi L (1997) Le radici della modernità. Max Weber 1891–1909, Roma, La Sapienza

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudo G, Palazzo AL (2000) Comunicare lUrbanistica. In: Piccinato G (ed) Roma, Gangemi

    Google Scholar 

  • Certosino D, Donzelli C (2000) “L’identità come risorsa. In: Meridiana. Rivista di storia e scienze sociali 37, pp 33–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervellati PL (1990) La città bella. Il recupero dell’ambiente urbano, Bologna, Il Mulino

    Google Scholar 

  • Clementi A (1995) Città mediterranee. In: AA.VV., Mediterraneo. Città, territorio, economie alle soglie del XXI secolo, vol I, Saggi, Roma, Credito Fondiario Industriale SPA, pp 167–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusmano MG (2002) Città ed insediamenti. In: Cusmano SC (ed) Dalle prospettive dell’area vasta alla costruzione dello Statuto dei luoghi, Milano, Franco Angeli, pp 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1996) Beyond growth. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • De Candia L (2004) Anime di luoghi. Milano, Franco Angeli

    Google Scholar 

  • De Matteis G (1986) L’ambiente come contingenza e il mondo come rete, in Urbanistica n. 85

    Google Scholar 

  • De Matteis G (1991) La scomposizione metropolitana. In: Nicolin P (ed) Atlante metropolitano, Quaderni di Lotus, Electa, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • De Matteis G (1995) Globale e locale, rete e nodi. In: Dematteis G (ed) Progetto implicito, Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rita G (1992) Il confronto sul futuro delle città. In: Asterischi, Laterza, luglio/settembre

    Google Scholar 

  • Dino A (2004) Cittadini invisibili: una vita ‘senza dimora. In: AA.VV., Angelini A (ed) Metropoli, sostenibilità e governo dell’ambiente, Roma, Carocci, pp 35–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Farinelli F (2003) Geografia. Un’introduzione ai modelli del mondo, Torino, Einaudi, see in particular the paragraph “Tra mito e archetipo: che cos’è una città?”, pp 132–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley MI (1977) The ancient city: from Fustel de Coulanges to Max Weber and Beyond. In: Comparative studies in sociology anf history, vol XIX, pp 305–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielli B (1993) Il recupero della città esistente, Milano Etaslibri

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambi L (1972) I valori storici dei quadri ambientali. In: AA.VV. Storia d’Italia, vol 1 I caratteri originali, Einaudi, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambino R. (1990) I centri storici italiani: quadro critico e strategie operative, relazioni al congresso nazionale Ancsa 1960-1990. Un contributo alla riqualificazione della città esistente, Gubbio 26–28 ottobre (pre-actions)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparrini C (1994) L’attualità dell’urbanistica, Milano Etaslibri

    Google Scholar 

  • George P (1994) Geografia e sociologia, Milano, Il Saggiatore 1994 (trans: R. Scacchi)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity. Self and Society in the Late of Modern Age. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannoni G (1977) Il capitello e la città (by Zucconi G), Milano, Jaka Book, pp 9–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Glotz G (1928) La cité grecque, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidicini P (2004) Il nuovo urbanesimo tra indifferenza e condivisione. In: AA.VV. Angelini A (ed) Metropoli, sostenibilità e governo dell’ambiente, Roma, Carocci, pp 30–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones E (1993) Metropoli. Le più grandi città del mondo (introduction by De Seta C), Roma, Donzelli, pp 105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Corbusier (1925) L’Urbanisme, Paris, Vincent Fréal 1925 (Italian translation L’Urbanistica, Milano, Il Saggiatore 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugli PM (1967) Storia e cultura della città italiana, Bari, Laterza, pp 247, 248

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch K (1990) Progettare la città. La qualità della forma urbana (introduction by Gabrielli B), Milano, Etaslibri

    Google Scholar 

  • Macchi Cassia C (1991) Il grande progetto urbano. La Nuova Italia Scientifica, La forma della città e i desideri dei cittadini, Roma, p 64

    Google Scholar 

  • Momigliano A (1984) Settimo Contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Edizioni di storia e letteratura, Roma, p 564

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo PC (2004) Un campo di pratiche, una varietà di profili: tendenze evolutive dell’urbanistica italiana. Territorio 31:92–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Perulli P (2000) La città delle reti. Forme di governo nel postfordismo, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirenne H (1917) (1927), Les Villes du Moyen Age. Bruxelles and Histoire de l’Europe. Des invasions au XVI siècle, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1998) On competition. Harvard Business Review Book, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffestin D (1981) Per una geografia del potere, Milano Unicopli

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi B (1992) Il confronto sul futuro delle città. In: Asterischi, Laterza, luglio/settembre

    Google Scholar 

  • Violante C (1953) La società milanese nell’età comunale. Bari, Laterza

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivanti C (1972) Lacerazioni e contrasti. In: Storia d’Italia 1, Torino, Einaudi, p 896 ff

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Maria Colavitti .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Colavitti, A.M. (2018). Development of a Multidisciplinary Approach. In: Urban Heritage Management. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72338-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics