Skip to main content

Solute/Stacking Fault Energies in Mg and Implications for Ductility

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Magnesium Technology 2018 (TMS 2018)

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3162 Accesses

Abstract

Mg is the lightest structural metal but pure Mg has low ductility due to strong plastic anisotropy and to a transition of <c+a> pyramidal dislocations to a sessile basal-oriented structure [1]. Alloying generally improves ductility , but the mechanisms of the enhancement are not yet known. Mg-3 wt% RE (RE = Y, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er) show high ductility [2], as compared to most commercial Mg–Al–Zn alloys at similar grain size. To investigate possible proposed mechanisms of ductility in alloys, and differences between Al, Zn, and Y solutes, first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations are used to compute all relevant stacking fault (SF) energies as a function of solute type (Y, Al, Zn) and concentration in the dilute limit.

In DFT calculations, we compute the solute-SF interaction energy \( E_{int} \left( {d_{i} } \right) \) versus solute-SF distance d i . Accurate energies requires the use of large supercells. For the pyramidal II plane, a single solute may induce migration of the SF. Constraints, and corrections for the constraints, are thus needed. In the random alloy, every atom site has a probability c (in at.) to be occupied by a solute atom. The value of the SF energy of the alloy, at small c, is then \( \gamma^{A} = \gamma^{Mg} + \frac{c}{{A_{0} }}\sum\nolimits_{i} {E_{int} \left( {d_{i} } \right)} . \)

The stacking fault energies for basal and pyramidal faults versus concentration are shown in Fig. 1 for the solutes Y, Al and Zn. From these results, we can draw some conclusions regarding ductility in Mg alloys. First, the proposed role of the I1 basal SF in ductility enhancement in Mg–Y [2] is not supported. The effects of Y can be achieved at twice the concentration using Al. However, neither Mg–Al or Mg–Zn alloys show significantly enhanced ductility. Second, using the I1 and pyr. II SFs for Y, elasticity calculations show that Y does not appear to significantly alter the energetics of the detrimental pyramidal-to-basal orientation transformation. Third, the only unique property of Y, compared to Al and Zn, is the much larger reduction of the pyramidal I SF energy. This suggests new mechanisms for enhanced ductility that will be discussed and supported by further results on other solutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Z. Wu, W.A. Curtin, Nature, 526 (2015) 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Sandlobes, et al., Acta Materialia, 59 (2011) 429–439; Acta Materialia 70 (2014) 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Yin, Z. Wu, and W. A. Curtin, Acta Materialia, 136 (2017) 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. A. Curtin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yin, B., Wu, Z., Curtin, W.A. (2018). Solute/Stacking Fault Energies in Mg and Implications for Ductility. In: Orlov, D., Joshi, V., Solanki, K., Neelameggham, N. (eds) Magnesium Technology 2018. TMS 2018. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72332-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics