Abstract
For upscale simulation and modeling of magnesium alloys, data of surface and interfacial energies are critical. In this work, we calculated the surface energies of Mg17Al12 β-phase with different surface configurations by using molecular dynamic simulations. Surface terminations were carefully selected to calculate the energy of β-phase. The lowest energy surface for each crystallographic plane was determined by varying the surface termination. The results show that surfaces occupied by higher fraction of magnesium atoms generate lower surface energies. The interfacial energy for Mg17Al12 β-phase and Mg matrix was calculated as well based on the Burger’s orientation relationship. We found that the lowest energy surface of Mg17Al12 does not generate the lowest interfacial energy. The interfacial energy for Mg17Al12 β-phase and a \( \left\{ {10\bar{1}2} \right\} \) twin was also calculated. The interfacial energy increases by ~250 mJ/m2 due to the change in orientation relationship between Mg17Al12 and the matrix after twinning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Hirsch J, Al-Samman T (2013) Superior light metals by texture engineering: Optimized aluminum and magnesium alloys for automotive applications. Acta Mater 61:818–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.044
Mordike BL, Ebert T (2001) Magnesium: properties—applications—potential. Mater Sci Eng A 302:37–45
Smola B, Stulı́ková I, von Buch F, Mordike BL (2002) Structural aspects of high performance Mg alloys design. Mater Sci Eng A 324:113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01291-6
Frank C (2011) Magnesium Alloys-Design, Processing and Properties. Intech: India
Hutchinson CR, Nie J-F, Gorsse S (2005) Modeling the precipitation processes and strengthening mechanisms in a Mg-Al-(Zn) AZ91 alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 36:2093–2105
Celotto S (2000) TEM study of continuous precipitation in Mg–9 wt%Al–1 wt%Zn alloy. Acta Mater 48:1775–1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00004-5
Zhang M-X, Kelly PM (2003) Crystallography of Mg17Al12 precipitates in AZ91D alloy. Scr Mater 48:647–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00555-9
Nie J-F (2012) Precipitation and Hardening in Magnesium Alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 43:3891–3939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1217-2
Robson JD, Stanford N, Barnett MR (2013) Effect of Precipitate Shape and Habit on Mechanical Asymmetry in Magnesium Alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 44:2984–2995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1466-0
Liao M, Li B, Horstemeyer MF (2013) Interaction between prismatic slip and a Mg17Al12 precipitate in magnesium. Comput Mater Sci 79:534–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.07.016
Liao M, Li B, Horstemeyer MF (2014) Interaction Between Basal Slip and a Mg17Al12 Precipitate in Magnesium. Metall Mater Trans A 45:3661–3669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2284-3
Li B, Zhang XY (2016) Twinning with zero twinning shear. Scr Mater 125:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.07.004
Salman SA, Ichino R, Okido M (2010) A Comparative Electrochemical Study of AZ31 and AZ91 Magnesium Alloy. Int J Corros 2010:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/412129
Zhao M-C, Liu M, Song G, Atrens A (2008) Influence of the β-phase morphology on the corrosion of the Mg alloy AZ91. Corros Sci 50:1939–1953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.04.010
Lü YZ, Wang QD, Ding WJ, et al (2000) Fracture behavior of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Mater Lett 44:265–268
Han G, Han Z, Alan AL, et al (2013) PHASE field simulation on morphology of continuous precipitate Mg17Al12 in Mg–Al alloy. Acta Metall Sin 49:277. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00531
Han G, Han Z, Luo AA, Liu B (2014) Three-Dimensional Phase-Field Simulation and Experimental Validation of β-Mg17Al12 Phase Precipitation in Mg-Al-Based Alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 46:948–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2674-6
Han Z, Han G, Luo AA, Liu B (2015) Large-scale three-dimensional phase-field simulation of multi-variant β-Mg17Al12 in Mg–Al-based alloys. Comput Mater Sci 101:248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.01.038
Li M, Ruijie Z, John A (2010) Modeling Casting and Heat Treatment Effects on Microstructure in Super Vacuum Die Casting (SVDC) AZ91 Magnesium Alloy. In: Magnes. Technol. 2010 Proc. Symp. Held Tms 2010 Annu. Meet. Exhib. Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, pp 623–627
Xiao W, Zhang X, Geng WT, Lu G (2013) Atomistic study of plastic deformation in Mg–Al alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 586:245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.07.093
Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS (1986) Embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys Rev B 33:7983
Liu X-Y, Ohotnicky PP, Adams JB, et al (1997) Anisotropic surface segregation in Al–Mg alloys. Surf Sci 373:357–370
Curtin WA, Olmsted DL, Hector LG (2006) A predictive mechanism for dynamic strain ageing in aluminium-magnesium alloys. Nat Mater Lond 5:875–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat1765
Olmsted DL, Jr LGH, Curtin WA, Clifton RJ (2005) Atomistic simulations of dislocation mobility in Al, Ni and Al/Mg alloys. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 13:371. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/13/3/007
Jones R, Baer D, Danielson M, Vetrano J (2001) Role of Mg in the stress corrosion cracking of an Al–Mg alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 32:1699–1711
Jelinek B, Groh S, Horstemeyer MF, et al (2012) Modified embedded atom method potential for Al, Si, Mg, Cu, and Fe alloys. Phys Rev B 85:245102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.245102
Stukowski A (2010) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:015012
Ning H, Zhou Z, Zhang Z, et al (2017) Hydrogen dissociation and incorporation on Mg17Al12(100) surface: A density functional theory study. Appl Surf Sci 396:851–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.041
Zhang J-M, Ma F, Xu K-W (2003) Calculation of the surface energy of bcc metals by using the modified embedded-atom method. Surf Interface Anal 35:662–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.1587
Zhang J-M, Ma F, Xu K-W (2004) Calculation of the surface energy of FCC metals with modified embedded-atom method. Appl Surf Sci 229:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2003.09.050
Liu B-Y, Wang J, Li B, et al (2014) Twinning-like lattice reorientation without a crystallographic twinning plane. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4297
Acknowledgements
Bin Li gratefully thanks support from the U.S. National Science Foundation (CMMI-1635088).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, F., Li, B. (2018). Surface and Interfacial Energies of Mg17Al12–Mg System. In: Orlov, D., Joshi, V., Solanki, K., Neelameggham, N. (eds) Magnesium Technology 2018. TMS 2018. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72332-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72332-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72331-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72332-7
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)