Skip to main content

Who Are We? A Democracy Without Demos

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Democracy in Europe

Part of the book series: The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy ((PSTCD))

  • 521 Accesses

Abstract

Principal theories about European democracy agree that there is no European demos. In my opinion, the “no demos theory” has an excessively demanding concept of demos, utopian for federalists and static for intergovernmentalists. In both cases, it is so categorical that it does not correspond to the history from which political communities have arisen, nor to how a sense of belonging is truly established, nor to the limits on the expectations we can reasonably hold for Europe. The demos could be more practical and contingent, more performative and vulnerable. Additionally, what if the demoi who “truly exist” were not such a solid group or did not need to be so? In that case, it may even be that European integration represents an opportunity to articulate unity and diversity in a manner that is more respectful of its internal plurality.

“The very notions we employ in thinking and talking of political matters have gradually become deceptive and inconvenient. The word ‘people,’ for instance, had an exact meaning when it was possible to gather all the citizens of a town together, round a hillock in a public square. But the increase in numbers, the transition from the order of thousands to millions, has made the word ‘people’ a monstrous term whose sense depends on the sentence into which it enters”

(Valéry 1996 [1931], 15–16).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, Emanuel. 2009. Europe as a Civilizational Community of Practice. In Civilizations in World Politics. Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, ed. P. Katzenstein, 67–90. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Christopher J., André Blais, Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Ola Listhaug, eds. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiner, Ronald. 1983. Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, Richard, and Dario Castiglione. 1998. The Normative Challenge of a European Polity: Cosmopolitan and Communitarian Models Compared, Criticised and Combined. In Democracy and the European Union, ed. A. Follesdal and P. Koslowsky, 254–284. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Besson, Samantha. 2006. Deliberative Demoi-cracy in the European Union: Towards the Deterritorialization of Democracy. In Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents, ed. Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, Chris J. 2012. European Integration. From Nation States to Member States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breton, Raymond. 1995. Identification in Transnational Political Communities. In Rethinking Federalism: Citizens, Markets, and Governments in a Changing World, ed. K. Knop. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederman, Lars Erik. 2001. Nationalism and Bounded Integration: What It Would Take to Construct a European Demos. European Journal of International Relations 7 (2): 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti, Furio. 2008. Why Political Identity and Legitimacy Matter in the European Union. In The Search for a European Identity: Values, Policies and Legitimacy of the European Union, ed. Furio Cerutti and Sonia Lucarelli, 3–22. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, Laura. 2012. Does EU Need a Navel? Implicit and Explicit Identification with the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (1): 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert. 1983. Federalism and the Democratic Process. In Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy, ed. J.R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman, 95–108. New York City: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1984. Otobiographies. L’enseignement de Nietzsche et la politique du nom propre. Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon, ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, Erik. 2005. Reflexive Integration in Europe. In Making the European Polity. Reflexive Integration in the European Union, ed. Erik Eriksen, 9–29. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, Erik, and John Erik Fossum. 2011. Representation Through Deliberation. The European Case, ARENA Working Paper No. 5, May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrini, Sergio. 2007. Compound Democracies. Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1975. Nietzsche, la généalogie, l’histoire. In Dits et écrits. Vol. 2, 136–156. París: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, Dieter. 1995. Does Europe Need a Constitution? European Law Journal 1: 282–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Die Zukunft der Verfassung II. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst B. 1961. International Integration: The European and The Universal Process. International Organization 15 (3): 366–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1999. Die Einbeziehung der Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauss, Claudia. 2005. Europa als politische Gemeinschaft. In Europawissenschaft, ed. Pernice Schuppert and Ulrich Haltern, 489–539. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Ivor. 1956. The Approach to Self-Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Michael. 1988. State and Regional Nationalism: Territorial Politics and the European State. London: Harvester and Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumm, Matthias. 2012. The Best of Times and the Worst of Times. Between Constitutional Triumphalism and Nostalgia. In The Twilight of Constitutionalism? ed. Petra Dobner and Martin Loughlin, 201–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, Ulrike. 2012. The Emergence of a European Identity. In Key Controversies in European Integration, ed. Hubert Zimmermann and Andreas Dür, 96–103. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, Hans. 2003. Sovereignty and Representation in the European Union. In Sovereignty in Transition. Essays in European Law, ed. Neil Walker, 87–114. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Towards an Ontology of Collective Selfhood. In The Paradox of Constitutionalism, ed. M. Loughlin and N. Walker, 9–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1993. Zeichen als Form. In Probleme der Form, ed. Dirk Baecker, 45–69. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maduro, Miguel Poiares. 1998. We the Court—The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico. 1998. Europe’s ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards. European Law Journal 1: 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Europe as the Would-Be World Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Political and Normative Limits to Piecemeal Integration. Rethinking the European Project after the Crisis of Monetary Union. Keynote Lecture at RECON Concluding Conference, Oslo, 24–26 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez, Agustín José. 2005. The Purse of the Polity. In Making the European Polity. Reflexive Integration in the European Union, ed. Erik Eriksen, 187–213. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David. 2000. Citizenship and National Identity. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1988. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Jan-Werner. 2011. The Promise of Demoi-cracy: Democracy, Diversity, and Domination in the European Public Order. In Political Theory of the European Union, ed. Jürgen Neyer and Antjie Wiener, 187–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näsström, Sofia. 2007. The Legitimacy of the People. Political Theory 35: 624–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaïdis, Kalypso. 2003. Our European Demoi-cracy: Is this Constitution a Third Way for Europe? In Whose Europe? National Models and the Constitution of the European Union, ed. K. Nicolaïdis and S. Weatherill. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Germany as Europe: How the Constitutional Court Unwilttingly Embraced EU Demoi-cracy. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9 (3–4): 986–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus. 1998. Demokratie und Wohlfahrtsstaat: Eine europäische Regimeform unter dem Streß der europäschen Integration. In Internationale Wirtschaft, nationale Demokratie, ed. Wolfgang Streeck, 99–136. Campus: Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. The Democratic Welfare State in an Integrating Europe. In Democracy Beyond the State? The European Dilemma and the Emerging Global Order, ed. M.T. Greven and L.W. Pauly. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Herausforderung der Demokratie. Zur Integrations- und Leistungsfähigkeit politischer Institutionen. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Johan P. 2005. Unity and Diversity-European Style. Working Paper of the Arena. Center for European Studies, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Bernhard. 2005. Public Discourse, Identity, Democratic Legitimacy. In Making the European Polity. Reflexive Integration in the European Union, ed. Erik Eriksen, 84–124. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Henry S. 2002. Democratic Autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röttgers, Kurt. 1983. Texte und Menschen. Würzburg: Königshauser und Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz. 1998. Demokratische Politik in der internationalisierten Ökonomie. In Demokratie – eine Kultur des Westens? 20. Wissenschaftlicher Kongress der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft, ed. Michael Greven, 81–103. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe C. 1996. How to Democratize the Emerging Euro-Politik: Citizenship, Representation, Decision-Making. Berlin: Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Anthony. 1995. Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang. 1995. Neo-Voluntarism: A New European Social Policy Regime? European Law Journal 1 (1995): 31–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theiler, Tobias. 2012. Does the European Union Need to Become a Community? Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (5): 783–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valéry, Paul. 1996 [1931]. Regards sur le monde actuel et autres essais. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, Philippe, and John Rawls. 2003. Three Letters on the Law of Peoples and the European Union. Revue de philosophie économique 8 (2003): 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Roermund, Bert. 2002. Instituting Authority: Some Kelsenian Notes. Ratio Juris 15 (2): 206–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Sovereignty: Unpopular and Popular. In Sovereignty in Transition. Essays in European Law, ed. Neil Walker, 33–54. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, Bernhard. 1997. Topographie des Fremden. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Neil. 2011. The EU’s Resilient Sovereignty Question. In Political Theory of the European Union, ed. Jürgen Neyer and Antjie Wiener, 91–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph. 1999. The Constitution of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Federalism Without Constitutionalism: Europe’s ‘Sonderweg’. In The Federal Vision. Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union, ed. Kalypso Nicolaïdis and Robert Howse, 54–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph, Haltern Ulrich, and Mayer Franz. 1995. European Democracy and Its Critique. In The Crisis of Representation in Europe, ed. J. Hayward, 4–39. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, Anthony. 1994. Wilsonian Self-Determination and the Versailles Settlement. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 43: 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Innerarity, D. (2018). Who Are We? A Democracy Without Demos. In: Democracy in Europe. The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72197-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics