Advertisement

Clustering of New Cities and the Theory of a Herd Mentality

  • Russell M. SmithEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Newly incorporated municipalities (NIMs) disproportionately are located near other new municipalities. This clustering phenomenon had been previously identified by scholars, but little research had been conducted on why it occurs. Based upon more recent research, new cities seem to cluster together as a result of a herd mentality in which numerous and proximate unincorporated communities follow one another along the path to local self-determination. Additional research has also identified the presence of a pioneer NIM, who clears the numerous hurdles facing a community that wishes to incorporate and blazes a trail for subsequent incorporations within a limited geographic area. In the USA, 57% of the NIMs incorporated since 1990 have done so within a county with at least one additional new municipality. On the extreme end of this spatial pattern lie several hyperclustering counties that witnessed the incorporation of more than four NIMs between 1990 and 2010. These counties include King County, WA; Miami-Dade County, FL and Union County, NC. On the metropolitan wide scale, the Atlanta Metro Region has recently seen the incorporation of 10 NIMs since 2005, with the potential for several more in the coming years. In the end, the grouping of new cities in close geography seems to be a spatial pattern that will continue into the future as unincorporated areas learn from nearby neighbors how and why they can and should incorporate.

Keywords

Atlanta Charlotte Clustering Herd mentality Hyperclustering Pioneer NIM 

References

  1. Anderson J (2011) Leaders make case for incorporation—Peachtree corners could become 16th city in Gwinnett. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 1 Sept 2011Google Scholar
  2. Anderson J (2012) Newest city off to bumpy beginning—$2.7 million budget, moratorium on new businesses Stir I-Told-You-So’s. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 8 July 2012Google Scholar
  3. Ball J (1994) Marvin, Lake Park incorporate. Charlotte Observer, 2 July 1994Google Scholar
  4. Barron A (1996) Towns tests proposal to incorporate. Greensboro News & Record, 24 June 1996, B1Google Scholar
  5. Bennett DL (2006) New cities set to take control on Northside. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 20 July 2006, D1Google Scholar
  6. Bennett DL (2007) Fulton may get a new, Rural city. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 17 June 2007, D1Google Scholar
  7. Broward County (2005) Broward-by-the-numbers. Retrieved on 24 May 2017 from http://www.broward.org/Planning/FormsPublications/Documents/bbtn41.pdf
  8. Brown C (2007) DeKalb fears Tax Jolt from Dunwoody—County’s Loss if city is incorporated Pegged at $15 million. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 15 Jan 2007Google Scholar
  9. Duncan TC (2015) Historic vote for cities doesn’t end with election day results. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 8 Nov 2015Google Scholar
  10. Flechas J (2016) Miami-Dade County should create new cities, report says. The Miami Herald. 1 Apr 2016, 6AGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawley AH (1959) The incorporation trend in metropolitan areas, 1900–1950. J Am Inst Plann 25(1):41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herald Staff Reports (2002) New rules for new cities include disputed Dade fee. The Miami Herald, 27 Feb 2002, 3BGoogle Scholar
  13. Hunt A (2012) Vote on New City may be pivotal—Brookhaven loss could stall incorporation push Metrowide. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 9 July 2012Google Scholar
  14. Kaplan P (2006) Data gives New-City Backers a Boost—study projects financial viability. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 12 Jan 2006Google Scholar
  15. Kass A (2016) S. Fulton residents weigh cityhood—voters to decide whether to form municipality of else area may face possibility of annexations. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 23 Oct 2016Google Scholar
  16. Lazega RM, Fletcher CR (1997) The politics of municipal incorporation in South Florida. J Land Use Environ Law, 215–245Google Scholar
  17. Little S (1994) Government has become County’s growth industry—we now have 9—yes, 9—Mayors to elect. Charlotte Observer, 10 July 1994Google Scholar
  18. Mazzei P (2014) Potential new or expanded cities vex Miami-Dade commissioners. The Miami Herald, 27 Feb 2014Google Scholar
  19. Niesse M (2015a) New cities drive new rift in region—incorporations divide area by class, race. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 22 Feb 2015, A1Google Scholar
  20. Niesse M (2015b) City push hits new phase—voters to decide future of LaVista Hills, Tucker in November. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 5 Apr 2015Google Scholar
  21. Niesse M (2016a) Sharon Springs cityhood effort withdrawn—concerns arose over limited services, tax caps. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 4 Jan 2016Google Scholar
  22. Niesse M (2016b) Greenhaven proposal stalls—Georgia house panel tables plan to create DeKalb city. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 18 Feb 2016Google Scholar
  23. Niesse M (2016c) Voters will decide if Stonecrest is city—proposal is designated to attract companies, create new jobs. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 9 Oct 2016Google Scholar
  24. Niesse M (2017) City of prosperity proposed in DeKalb. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 11 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  25. Niesse M, Kass A (2016) Has cityhood drive peaked? South Fulton, Stonecrest proposals on ballot, but movement is slowing. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 31 Mar 2016Google Scholar
  26. Nurse D (2006) Johns Creek, Milton officially on the map as of Friday. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 30 Nov 2006Google Scholar
  27. Pearson M (2006) N. Fulton revolts: Johns Creek, Milton opt for cityhood. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 19 July 2006, D1Google Scholar
  28. Peterson S, Bernhard K (2001) New Towns add to County fabric—a half-dozen Hamlets incorporated with hopes of preserving their rural character. Charlotte Observer, 18 Nov 2001, 16UGoogle Scholar
  29. Schmandt HJ (1961) The municipal incorporation trend, 1950–1960. Madison, Wisconsin: Bureau of Government Research and Advisory Service, University Extension Division, University of WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith RM (2008) Municipal incorporation activity and the clustering of new municipalities in North Carolina: 1990–2008. North Carol Geogr 16:24–35Google Scholar
  31. Smith RM (2014) Examining the geography of newly incorporated municipalities (NIMs) in micropolitan North Carolina, 1990–2010. Southeast Geogr 54(4):384–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith RM, Debbage KG (2006) Where are the geographers? Newly incorporated municipalities (NIMs) in the southeast. Geogr Bull 48:109–121Google Scholar
  33. Smith RM, Debbage KG (2011) Spatial distribution of newly incorporated municipalities (NIMs) and related socio-economic characteristics: a national comparison to cohort cities. Urban Geogr 32(4):568–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stauber R (1965) New cities in America; a census of municipal incorporations in the United States, 1950–1960. Lawrence, Kansas: Governmental Research Center, University of KansasGoogle Scholar
  35. Visser S (2012) Narrow win for ‘Sliver; of a city—voters create large, divided municipality. Next for Brookhaven is creating human infrastructure. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 2 Aug 2012Google Scholar
  36. Waldner L, Smith RM (2015) The great defection: how new city clusters form to escape county governance. Publ Adm Quart 39(2):171–219Google Scholar
  37. Washington W (2016a) Incorporation process was entirely legal, Westlake says. The Palm Beach Post, 26 June 2016, 1AGoogle Scholar
  38. Washington W (2016b) County wants GL pledge not to incorporate. The Palm Beach Post, 22 Sept 2016, 1AGoogle Scholar
  39. Wright T (2007) No annexation option for South County. The Miami Herald, 26 Aug 2007, 19AGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.History, Politics and Social JusticeWinston-Salem State UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations