Advertisement

The Process of Municipal Incorporation in the USA

  • Russell M. SmithEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

The USA operates under a federal system of governance that has implications for local governance and government. Within the federal system, local governments are creatures of the individual states and are not guaranteed any specific rights or privileges. Additionally, within the USA, states can be classified as either Dillon’s Rule or Home Rule states. This differentiation largely determines which powers local governments can exercise within their jurisdiction. As a result of this federal system—requirements, procedures, and processes governing incorporation standards across the country can differ dramatically. With that said, some of the similarities in municipal incorporation standards across the country include minimum population size, minimum population density, minimum tax rate and minimum distance between proposed and existing municipalities. Meanwhile, differences in incorporating standards found across the USA include county approval, approval from a local government boundary commission, and/or a feasibility study that explores the financial viability of a new municipality, as well as its impact on existing jurisdictions. In the end, municipalities are granted a wide array of powers that have grown over the years and currently include general governance, public safety, economic development, and a variety of other charges.

Keywords

Dillon’s rule Federal Home Rule Incorporation methods Legislative standards Metropolitan reformers Public choice proponents Unitary 

References

  1. Broward County, FL (2016) Unincorporated Broward. Retrieved 17 May 2016 from https://www.broward.org/PlanningAndRedevelopment/DemographicsAndEconomics/Documents/bbtn41.pdf
  2. Buchanan JM (1971) Principles of Urban fiscal strategy. Public Choice 11(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dillon J (1911) Commentaries on the law of municipal corporations. Little and Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Dye TR (1984) Party and policy in the states. J Politics 46:1097–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eells JM (1977) LAFCO spheres of influence: effective planning for the urban fringe? 77:3. Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  6. Foster KA (1993) Exploring the links between political structure and metropolitan growth. Polit Geogr 12(6):523–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glassner M, Fahrer C (2004) Political geography. Wiley, Hoboken, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  8. Hill R (1974) Separate and unequal: government equality in the metropolis. Am Polit Sci Rev 68(4):1557–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill MB (1978) State laws governing local government structure and administration. University of Georgia, Institute of Government, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
  10. Judd DR, Swanstrom T (2002) City politics: private power and public policy, 3rd edn. Longman Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Krane D, Rigos PN, Hill MB Jr (2001) Home rule in America: a fifty-state handbook. CQ Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawerence DM, Millonzi KA (2007) Incorporation of a North Carolina Town. School of Government: University of North Carolina at Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  13. LeGates RT (1970) California local agency formation commissions. University of California, Institute of Governmental StudiesGoogle Scholar
  14. Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR) (2001) Overview of Municipal Incorporations in Florida. State of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  15. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO) (2003) A guide to the LAFCO process for incorporations. Governor’s Office of Planning and ResearchGoogle Scholar
  16. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO) (2016) What is LAFCO?. Retrieved 17 May 2016 from http://calafco.org/about.htm
  17. Lowery D, Lyon WE (1989) The impact of jurisdictional boundaries: an individual-level test of the Tiebout model. J Polit 51(1):73–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lyons D, Lowery WE, DeHoog R (1992) The politics of dissatisfaction: citizens, services, and urban institutions. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin D, Wagner R (1978) The institutional framework for municipal incorporation: an economic analysis of local agency formation commissions in California. J Law Econ 21(October):409–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McBain HL (1916) The law and the practice of municipal home rule. Columbia University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  21. Morgan DR, Mareschal P (1999) Central-city/suburban inequality and metropolitan political fragmentation. Urban Aff Rev 34(4):578–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National League of Cities (2016) Local government authority. Retrieved 11 May 2016 from http://www.nlc.org/build-skills-and-networks/resources/cities-101/city-powers/local-government-authority
  23. North Carolina School of Government (NCSOG) (2010) Summary of municipal incorporation procedure in North Carolina. Retrieved 12 May 2016 from https://www.sog.unc.edu/sites/www.sog.unc.edu/files/reports/Incorporation-joint%20commission%20materials.pdf
  24. Ostrom V, Tiebout C, Warren R (1961) The organization of government in metropolitan areas. Am Polit Sci Rev 55(December):831–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson P (1981) City limits. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Purcell M (2001) Metropolitan political reorganization as a politics of urban growth: the case of San Fernando Valley secession. Polit Geogr 20:613–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rigos P, Spindler C (1991) Municipal incorporation and state statutes: a state-level analysis. State Local Gov Rev Spring, 76–81Google Scholar
  28. Rusk D (2003) Cities without suburbs. The John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneider M (1986) Fragmentation and the growth of local government. Public Choice 48:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shelley FM, Archer JC, Davidson FM, Brunn ST (1996) Political geography of the United States. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. State of Florida Statutes (2016) Formation of local governments—165.061. Retrieved 12 May 2016 from http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/
  32. Stein RM (1987) Tiebout’s sorting hypothesis. Urban Aff Quart 23:140–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Teaford JC (1984) The unheralded triumph: city government in America, 1870–1900. The John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  34. Tiebout C (1956) A pure theory of local public expenditure. J Polit Econ 64:416–424Google Scholar
  35. U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (USACIR) (1992) Local boundary commissions: status and roles in forming, adjusting and dissolving local government boundaries. M-183. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. U.S. Census Bureau, Census of Governments (2012) Census Bureau reports there are 89,004 Local Governments in the United States. Retrieved 25 May 2016 from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/governments/cb12-161.html
  37. Weiher GR (1991) The fractured metropolis: political fragmentation and metropolitan segregation. State University of NY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.History, Politics and Social JusticeWinston-Salem State UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations