Skip to main content

The Theory of ‘In-Between’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 844 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to provide a thematic overview of the theory of Critical Regionalism as a theory of ‘In-Between’. I explain how Kenneth Frampton’s project of Critical Regionalism combines the two traditions of phenomenology and critical thinking to establish a constructive dialogue between Habermas’s unfinished project of Modernity and Heidegger’s insistence on being as becoming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although Frampton never employs phenomenology in a classical way, his architectural thought is permeated by themes and concerns that are essentially phenomenological, thus making a constructive, though indirect, contribution to the phenomenological discourse in architecture. I have highlighted Frampton’s contribution to the phenomenological discourse in Shirazi (2013).

  2. 2.

    It needs to be mentioned that Frampton’s interest in developing a postmodern critical culture does not mean he is in favour of postmodernist architecture. As will be elaborated later in this chapter, Frampton criticizes postmodernism for its superficial historicism and populism.

  3. 3.

    The term Critical Regionalism was first coined in 1981 by Tzonis and Lefaivre in 1981 but later developed by Kenneth Frampton who endowed it with its distinctive character. For these authors’ interpretation of Critical Regionalism see: (Lefaivre and Tzonis 1985, 1990, 2003; Tzonis and Lefaivre 1991).

  4. 4.

    Heidegger has never talked about architecture and urban planning systematically, but has made extensive use of architectural references for conceptualizing his approach to space, place, dwelling, and other architectural concepts. For more details, see Shirazi (2007, 2014).

  5. 5.

    The idea of the Public Sphere (Öffentlichkeit in German) has been theorized by Habermas in his book The Structural Transformation of the Public SphereAn Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (German edition 1962, English Translation 1989). For Habermas events and occasions become public when, in contrast to exclusive affairs, they are available for all. Related to the notion of the ‘common world’ as suggested by Arendt (1998), the public sphere is a realm of our social life, open to all, in which something approaching public opinion can be formed.

  6. 6.

    A term of Greek origin, tectonic is derived from tecton and signifies a carpenter or builder, and this stems from the Sanskrit taksan, referring to the craft of carpentry and the use of an axe. Moreover, the Latin term architectus is derived from the Greek archi (a person of authority) and tekton (a craftsman or builder). The term ‘tectonic’ appeared in English for the first time in a glossary in 1656 meaning ‘belonging to building’. This term appeared in the middle of the nineteenth century in a modern sense with Karl Bötticher’s The Tectonic of the Hellenes and Gottfried Semper’s The Four Elements of Architecture.

  7. 7.

    Kimbell Art Museum accommodates the art collection of the Kimbell Art Foundation. The main building, designed by Louis Kahn, manifests his individual and significant architectural thinking on space, memory, structure and tradition. Recently Renzo Piano, the Italian architect, who had once worked in Kahn’s office, designed an extension to the museum that was respectfully in the spirit of Kahn’s building.

  8. 8.

    Semper distinguished between two separate material procedures in built form: tectonics of the frame (roofwork) and stereotomics of compressive mass (earthwork). While the former addresses members of varying lengths conjoined to encompass a spatial field, the latter is constructed through the piling up of identical units (the term stereotomics deriving from the Greek term for solid, stereos and for cutting, -tomia)” (Frampton 2002b: 95). This distinction has some ontological implications:‘[f]ramework tends towards the aerial and the dematerialization of mass, whereas the mass form is telluric, embedding itself ever deeper into the earth. The one tends towards light and the other towards dark. These gravitational opposites, the immateriality of the frame and the materiality of the mass, may be said to symbolize the two cosmological opposites to which they aspire: the sky and the earth. Despite our highly secularized techno-scientific age, these polarities still largely constitute the experiential limits of our lives’ (ibid.).

  9. 9.

    Completed in 1976, this church is located on the northern outskirts of Copenhagen.

  10. 10.

    After seeing a model of a Caribbean hut in the Great Exhibition of 1851, Semper proposed ‘four elements’ as an anthropological construct comprising: (1) a hearth, as the symbolic, public nexus of the work, (2) an earthwork (podium), (3) a framework (structure) and a roof considered together and (4) an enclosing membrane (wall) or the woven infill framework. He also attributed certain crafts to every element: metallurgy and ceramics to the hearth, masonry to the earthwork, carpentry to the structural frame, and textiles to the art of enclosure, side walls and roof.

  11. 11.

    Juhani Pallasmaa provides a detailed and thoughtful discussion on the production of vision-oriented architecture through the course of history, with a focus on its philosophical origin. See Pallasmaa (1996).

References

  • Arendt H (1998) The human condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1982a) Avant-garde and continuity. Architectural Des 52:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1982b) Place, production and architecture: towards a critical theory of building. Architectural Des 52:28–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1982c) The Isms of contemporary architecture. Architectural Des 52:61–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1982d) The resistance of architecture, an anthological postscript. Architectural Des 52:85

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1983) Prospects for a critical regionalism. Perspecta 20:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1988) Place-form and cultural identity. In: Thackara J (ed) Design after modernism, beyond the object. Thames and Hudson, New York, pp 51–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1989) Some reflections on postmodernism and architecture. In: Appignanesi L (ed) Postmodernism. Free Association Books, London, pp 75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1991) Critical regionalism revisited. In: Amourgis S (ed) Critical Regionalism, The Pomona Meeting Proceedings. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, pp 34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1992) Modern architecture, a critical history. Thames and Hudson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1995) Studies in tectonic culture: the poetics of construction in nineteenth and twentieth century architecture. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1996a) Universalism and/or regionalism. Untimely reflections on the future of the new. Domus 782:6–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1996b) On reading heidegger. In: Nesbitt K (ed) Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965–1995. Princeton Architectural Press, New York, pp 442–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1998) Technology. Place and Architecture, Rizzoli, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (2002a) Towards a critical regionalism: six points for an architecture of resistance. In: Frampton K (ed) Labour, work and architecture. Phaidon Press, London, pp 77–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (2002b) Rappel a l’Ordre: The Case for the Tectonic. In: Frampton K (ed) Labour, Work and Architectur. Phaidon Press, London, pp 91–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (2002c) Corporeal experience in the architecture of Tadao Ando. In: Dodds G, Tavernor R (eds) Body and building. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 303–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (2003) A conversation with Kenneth Frampton. October Mag 106:35–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1989) The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society. MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris HH (2007) Regionalism and nationalism in architecture. In: Canizaro V (ed) Architectural regionalism, collected writings on place, identity, modernity and tradition. Princeton Architectural Press, New York, pp 57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1971) Poetry, language, thought. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1993) Building dwelling thinking. In: Krell DF (ed) Basic writings: from being and time (1927) to The task of thinking (1964). Routledge, London, pp 347–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelbaugh D (2007) Critical regionalism: an architecture of place. In: Larice M, Macdonald E (eds) The urban design reader. Routledge, New York, pp 184–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefaivre L, Tzonis A (1985) The grid and the pathway: an introduction to the work of Dimitris and Suzana Antonakakis in the context of greek architectural culture. In: Frampton K (ed) Atelier 66. The architecture of Dimitris and Suzana Antonakakis, Rizzoli, New York, pp 14–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefaivre L, Tzonis A (1990) Why critical regionalism today? A+U 236:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefaivre L, Tzonis A (2003) Critical regionalism. Architecture and Identity in a Globalized World, Prestel, Munich and Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallasmaa J (1988) Tradition and modernity: the feasibility of regional architecture in post-modern society’. Architectural Rec 176(6):26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallasmaa J (1996) The eyes of the skin. Architecture and the Senses, Academy Editions, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi M R (2007) On space and language. Wolkenkuckucksheim, Int J Architectural Theor 12(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi MR (2013) Critical Regionalism, Raum, and Tactility; Kenneth Frampton’s contribution to phenomenological discourse in architecture. Environ Architectural Phenomenology 24(3):8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi MR (2014) Towards an articulated phenomenological interpretation of architecture: phenomenal phenomenology. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzonis A, Lefaivre L (1991) Critical regionalism. In: Amourgis S (ed) Critical regionalism, The Pomona Meeting Proceedings. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, pp 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber MM (1968) Explorations into urban structure. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 79–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolsey DK (1991) Critical regionalism: a theory of process. In: Amourgis S (ed) Critical regionalism, The Pomona meeting proceedings. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, pp 322–330

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Reza Shirazi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shirazi, M.R. (2018). The Theory of ‘In-Between’. In: Contemporary Architecture and Urbanism in Iran. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72185-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics