Skip to main content

Assessing the Effects of Social Familiarity and Stance Similarity in Interaction Dynamics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex Networks & Their Applications VI (COMPLEX NETWORKS 2017)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 689))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Homophily, the phenomenon of similar people getting connected to and being socially familiar with each other, is well-known on online social networks. Detection of user stance towards given topics, on online social networks, specifically Twitter, has emerged as a mainstream research topic. The current work provides insights into the impact of topic-specific stance similarity and social familiarity on social interaction dynamics. This is a novel and yet fundamental problem in social networks research, that has so far remained unexplored in the literature. Specifically, we address two key aspects. One, we investigate whether the smoothness (politeness) level of conversations between user pairs, relate with overall stance similarity (spanning across topics). Two, we examine the impact on interaction smoothness (politeness) with respect to social familiarity and topical stance-similarity. We propose a novel approach based on word embedding, to compare across users and across topics. We analyze the relationship between topical stance similarity, social familiarity and interaction politeness of users, with respect to specific familiarities between user pairs as well as social communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7XkCwpI5KDYNlNUTTlSS21pQmM/edit?usp=sharing.

  2. 2.

    https://snap.stanford.edu/data/twitter7.html.

  3. 3.

    http://an.kaist.ac.kr/traces/WWW2010.html.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/sudhof/politeness.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/stanfordnlp/CoreNLP/blob/master/data/edu/stanford/nlp/patterns/surface/stopwords.txt.

References

  1. Aral, S., Muchnik, L., Sundararajan, A.: Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. PNAS 106(51), 21544–21549 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., Vincent, P., Jauvin, C.: A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1137–1155 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharya, P., Goyal, P., Sarkar, S.: Query translation for cross-language information retrieval using multilingual word clusters. WSSANLP 2016, 142 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Experiment 2008(10), P10008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boltuzic, F., Karan, M., Alagic, D., Šnajder, J.: Takelab at semeval-2016 task 6: stance classification in tweets using a genetic algorithm based ensemble. In: Proceedings of SemEval, pp. 464–468 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cataldi, M., Di Caro, L., Schifanella, C.: Emerging topic detection on twitter based on temporal and social terms evaluation. In: Tenth International Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining, p. 4. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cataldi, M., Schifanella, C., Candan, K.S., Sapino, M.L., Di Caro, L.: Cosena: a context-based search and navigation system. In: International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, p. 33. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cunha, E., Magno, G., Comarela, G., Almeida, V., Gonçalves, M.A., Benevenuto, F.: Analyzing the dynamic evolution of hashtags on twitter: a language-based approach. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media, pp. 58–65. ACL (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Sudhof, M., Jurafsky, D., Leskovec, J., Potts, C.: A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.6078 (2013)

  11. De Choudhury, M., Sundaram, H., John, A., Seligmann, D.D., Kelliher, A.: “birds of a feather”: does user homophily impact information diffusion in social media? arXiv preprint arXiv:1006.1702 (2010)

  12. Dey, K., Shrivastava, R., Kaushik, S.: A paraphrase and semantic similarity detection system for user generated short-text content on microblogs. In: COLING, pp. 2880–2890 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dey, K., Shrivastava, R., Kaushik, S.: Twitter stance detection - a subjectivity and sentiment polarity inspired two-phase approach. In: SENTIRE Workshop, ICDM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dey, K., Shrivastava, R., Kaushik, S., Subramaniam, L.V.: Emtagger: a word embedding based novel method for hashtag recommendation on twitter. In: ACUMEN Workshop, ICDM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Halberstam, Y., Knight, B.: Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: evidence from twitter. J. Public Econ. 143, 73–88 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In: WWW, pp. 591–600. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lau, J.H., Collier, N., Baldwin, T.: On-line trend analysis with topic models:\(\backslash \)# twitter trends detection topic model online. In: COLING, pp. 1519–1534 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mathioudakis, M., Koudas, N.: Twittermonitor: trend detection over the twitter stream. In: SIGMOD, pp. 1155–1158. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27(1), 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013)

  21. Mishra, A., Dey, K., Bhattacharyya, P.: Learning cognitive features from gaze data for sentiment and sarcasm classification using convolutional neural network. In: ACL (vol. 1: Long Papers), vol. 1, pp. 377–387 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mohammad, S.M., Kiritchenko, S., Sobhani, P., Zhu, X., Cherry, C.: Semeval-2016 task 6: detecting stance in tweets. In: SemEval, vol. 16 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mohammad, S.M., Sobhani, P., Kiritchenko, S.: Stance and sentiment in tweets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01655 (2016)

  24. Musto, C., Semeraro, G., De Gemmis, M., Lops, P.: Word embedding techniques for content-based recommender systems: an empirical evaluation. In: RecSys Posters (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Newman, M.E.: Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103(23), 8577–8582 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nobata, C., Tetreault, J., Thomas, A., Mehdad, Y., Chang, Y.: Abusive language detection in online user content. In: WWW, pp. 145–153 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Papegnies, E., Labatut, V., Dufour, R., Linares, G.: Impact of content features for automatic online abuse detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.03289 (2017)

  28. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove: global vectors for word representation. EMNLP 14, 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rodríguez, M.A., Egenhofer, M.J.: Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 15(2), 442–456 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Šćepanović, S., Mishkovski, I., Gonçalves, B., Nguyen, T.H., Hui, P.: Semantic homophily in online communication: evidence from twitter. Online Soc. Netw. Media 2, 1–18 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmidt, A., Wiegand, M.: A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing. In: Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media. ACL, Valencia, pp. 1–10 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sidorov, G., Gelbukh, A., Gómez-Adorno, H., Pinto, D.: Soft similarity and soft cosine measure: Similarity of features in vector space model. Computación y Sistemas 18(3), 491–504 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stieglitz, S., Dang-Xuan, L.: Emotions and information diffusion in social mediasentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 29(4), 217–248 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vijayaraghavan, P., Sysoev, I., Vosoughi, S., Roy, D.: Deepstance at semeval-2016 task 6: detecting stance in tweets using character and word-level cnns. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05694 (2016)

  35. Weston, J., Chopra, S., Adams, K.: # tagspace: semantic embeddings from hashtags (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yang, J., Leskovec, J.: Patterns of temporal variation in online media. In: WSDM, pp. 177–186. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zarrella, G., Marsh, A.: Mitre at semeval-2016 task 6: transfer learning for stance detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03784 (2016)

  38. Zhang, Z., Lan, M.: Ecnu at semeval-2016 task 6: relevant or not? supportive or not? a two-step learning system for automatic detecting stance in tweets. SemEval, pp. 451–457 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhao, J., Lan, M., Tian, J.F.: Ecnu: using traditional similarity measurements and word embedding for semantic textual similarity estimation. In: SemEval, pp. 117–122 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuntal Dey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dey, K., Shrivastava, R., Kaushik, S., Mathur, V. (2018). Assessing the Effects of Social Familiarity and Stance Similarity in Interaction Dynamics. In: Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Karsai, M., Musolesi, M. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications VI. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2017. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 689. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72150-7_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72150-7_68

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72149-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72150-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics