Skip to main content

Shubnikov’s Scientific Work in Leiden: Shubnikov—De Haas Effect

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Life, Science and Times of Lev Vasilevich Shubnikov

Part of the book series: Springer Biographies ((SPRINGERBIOGS))

  • 502 Accesses

Abstract

At ambient temperatures bismuth has a layered structure and shows an extremely strong fluctuation of the resistance in a magnetic field, as well as substantial diamagnetism, meaning it is repelled by a magnetic field, as an applied magnetic field creates an induced magnetic field in the opposite direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This property of bismuth was actually often used to measure magnetic fields, but its behaviour was still far from understood.

  2. 2.

    Kapitsa had also tried to use the Obreimov-Shubnikov and the Bridgman methods to obtain crystal rods of about 3–5 mm in length with the crystallographic axis parallel and perpendicular to the axis of the rod, i.e. with perfect cleavage planes perpendicular or parallel to the length of the rods, but had not succeeded and developed an alternative method.

  3. 3.

    This must have been the steatite brought over from Leningrad as mentioned before.

  4. 4.

    The firm was founded in 1879 in Germany by Eugen Hartmann, who was joined in 1882 by Wunibald Braun forming the firm E. Hartmann & Co and continuing as Hartmann and Braun from 1901. By the turn of the century it had become a leading supplier of instrumentation devices. After several takeovers in the post-war years, it was finally taken over in 1999 by Asea Brown Boveri (ABB) AG and fully integrated into the ABB Group.

  5. 5.

    Hilger was founded in 1874 by two German precision optical instrument technicians Adam and Otto Hilger. They had fled Germany a few years previously to escape religious persecution and set up manufacturing of precision optical and mechanical instruments in London. The company prospered and also started to make high quality synthetic crystals since crystals that had previously been used did not keep pace with the increasing demands on optical components for infrared spectroscopy. Hilger started to grow and process synthetic crystals in house, which implied the birth of crystal growth at Hilger. In 1948 Hilger amalgamated with the metrology instrument manufacturer E.R. Watts and the company became known as Hilger and Watts. In July 2010 Hilger was acquired by the US corporation Dynasil. (Information from the website www.hilger-crystals.co.uk.)

  6. 6.

    A German firm in Berlin. The Firma Kahlbaum Laborpräparate was founded in 1890, merged in 1927 with Firma Schering to form Schering-Kahlbaum AG, which was acquired in 2006 by Bayer AG.

  7. 7.

    Casimir cannot have known the Shubnikovs very well, else he would certainly have remembered that her first name was Olga; so it is also doubtful that he knew her as being charming.

  8. 8.

    And six publications in Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam 33 (1930) 130–133; 327–331; 351–362; 363–378; 418–432; 433–439, which were also published as Leiden Communications (207a (1930) 3; 207b (1930) 9; 207c (1930) 17; 207d (1930) 35; 210a (1930) 3; 210b (1930) 21).

  9. 9.

    At nitrogen temperatures (about −200 °C) the quantum effects already disappear.

  10. 10.

    It was apparently first called as such in 1950 by B.I. Verkin, B.G. Lazarev, N.S. Rudenko, Periodicheskaja zavisimost’ vospriikchivosti metallov ot polja pri nizkikh temperaturakh (Periodic dependence of the susceptibility of metals on the field at low temperatures), Zhurn. eksperim. i teoret. fiziki 20 (1950) 93–97. This shows that Shubnikov’s name was not completely shunned by physicists even before Stalin’s death.

  11. 11.

    Pieter Martinus van Alphen (1906–1967). Obtained his PhD with De Haas in 1933 and later went to work for the Philips company in Eindhoven (Netherlands).

  12. 12.

    David Shoenberg (1911–2004) carried out many experiments on magnetic oscillations, at Cambridge and at Kapitsa’s institute in Moscow. “In his pioneering experiments of the 1960’s, Shoenberg revealed the richness and deep essence of the quantum oscillation effect and showed how the beauty of the effect is disclosed under nonlinear conditions imposed by interactions in the system under study.” (V.M. Pudalov, David Shoenberg and the beauty of quantum oscillations, Low Temp. Phys. 37 (2011) 8–18, p. 8.)

  13. 13.

    The Fermi surface is an abstract boundary (i.e. not in real space) useful for predicting the thermal, electrical, magnetic, and optical properties of metals, semimetals and doped semiconductors. The shape of the Fermi surface is derived from the periodicity and symmetry of the crystalline lattice and from the occupation of electronic energy bands. Electrons in crystals are arranged in energy bands separated by regions in energy which cannot be occupied by electrons (energy gaps). The existence of a Fermi surface is a direct consequence of the Pauli exclusion principle (Wikipedia).

  14. 14.

    J.W. Blom (1908–1975): studied in Leiden, gained his PhD with De Haas in 1950 on the Magneto-resistance for crystals of gallium, but always wanted to become a teacher. From 1944 he taught at the Rembrandt Lyceum in Leiden, later became director of a secondary school in Den Helder and in 1961 of his former school, the Rembrandt Lyceum in Leiden.

  15. 15.

    Diamagnetism is the phenomenon that, when an external magnetic field is applied to a material, an induced magnetic field is created in a direction opposite to the external field. It is a (rather weak) quantum mechanical effect occurring in all materials. When it is the only contribution to the material’s magnetism, the material is called a diamagnet. It was first discovered in bismuth and antimony by the Dutch botanist and physician Sebald Justinus Brugmans (1763–1819). In 1845 Michael Faraday (1791–1861) demonstrated that every material reacted (in either a diamagnetic or (para)magnetic way) to an external magnetic field and coined the name diamagnetism, contrary to substances that are called magnetic as they are attracted by a magnet. The magnetic group was later subdivided into ferromagnetic and paramagnetic substances.

  16. 16.

    In the classical theory it would be zero.

  17. 17.

    The actual predictions of his theory indeed qualitatively resemble the experimental data, but the magnetisation came out much too small. This was later rectified. It goes beyond the scope of this book to treat this here in any detail.

  18. 18.

    The Fermi-level or Fermi-energy is the topmost energy filled by an electron at absolute zero, where it is equal to the chemical potential. In a band structure picture, the Fermi level can be considered to be a hypothetical energy level of an electron, such that at thermodynamic equilibrium this energy level would have a 50% probability of being occupied at any given time.

  19. 19.

    https://lampx.tugraz.at/~hadley/ss2/problems/shubnikov/s.pdf.

  20. 20.

    There can also be no doubt that as a woman she was in a disadvantageous position, both in Leningrad and in Leiden, but especially in Leiden.

  21. 21.

    This shows that as a woman she was not taken as seriously as her husband and even belittled; it would have been unthinkable for Shubnikov to have been given such a name.

References

  1. P. Ehrenfest, Bemerkung über den Diagmagnetismus von festem Wismut, Physica 5 (1925) 388–391; Z. Phys. 58 (1929) 719–721.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.L. Kapitza, The study of specific resistance of bismuth crystals and its change in strong magnetic fields and some allied problems I-III, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 119 (1928) 358–443.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B.I. Verkin et al. (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Goetz, On Mechanical and Magnetic Factors Influencing the Orientation and Perfection of Bismuth Single-Crystals, Phys. Rev. 35 (1930) 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Schubnikov, Über die Herstellung von Wismuteinkristallen, Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam 33 (1930) 327–331.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L.V. Shubnikov and W. de Haas, Izgotovlenie i issledovanie kristallov Vismuta (Preparation and investigation of Bismuth crystals), Zhurnal Russkogo fiziko-khimicheskogo obshchestva LXII (1930) 530–537.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Schubnikov, W.J. de Haas, Die Abhängigkeit des elektrischen Widerstandes von Wismutkristallen von der Reinheit des Metalles, Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam 33 (1930) 350–362, p. 350.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.B.G. Casimir, Haphazard Reality: Half a Century of Science (Harper & Row, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L.V. Shubnikov and W.J. de Haas, A new phenomenon in the change of resistance in a magnetic field of single crystals of bismuth, Nature 126 (1930) 500.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.B. Alers and R.T. Webber, The Anomalous Magnetoresistance of Bismuth at Low Temperatures, Phys. Rev. 84 (1951) 863–864; The Magnetoresistance of Bismuth Crystals at Low Temperatures, Phys. Rev. 91 (1953) 1060–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L.W. Schubnikow, W.J. de Haas, Neue Erscheinungen bei der Widerstandsänderung von Wismuteinkristallen im Magnetfeld bei der Temperatur von Flussigem Wasserstoff I, Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam 33 (1930) 363–378.

    Google Scholar 

  12. O.N. Trapeznikova in B.I. Verkin et al. (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L.W. Schubnikow, W.J. de Haas, Neue Erscheinungen bei der Widerstandsänderung von Wismuteinkristallen im Magnetfeld bei der Temperatur von Flüssigem Wasserstoff II, Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam 33 (1930) 418–432.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Schubnikov, W.J. de Haas, Die Widerstandsänderung von Wismuteinkristallen im Magnetfeld bei der Temperatur von Flüssigem Stickstoff, Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam 33 (1930) 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W.J. de Haas and P.M. van Alphen, The dependence of the susceptibility of diamagnetic metals upon the field, Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam 33 (1930) 1106–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Landau, Diamagnetismus der Metalle, Diamagnetismus der Metalle, Z. Phys. 64 (1930) 629–637.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B.G. Lazarev, N.M. Nakhimovich and E.A. Parfenova, Vlijanie magnitnogo polja na elektricheskoe soprotivlenie monokristallov tsinka i kadmija pri nizkikh temperaturakh (Effect of a magnetic field on the electrical resistance of mono-crystals of zinc and cadmium in a magnetic field at low temperatures), Zhurn. Eksperim. i Teoret. Fiziki 9 (1939) 1169–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B.G. Lazarev, N.M. Nakhimovich and E.A. Parfenova, Elektricheskoe soprotivlenie monokristallov tsinka i kadmija v magnitnom pole pri nizkikh temperaturakh (Electrical resistance of mono-crystals of zinc and cadmium in a magnetic field at low temperatures), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR XXIV (1939) 855–859.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Shoenberg, Magnetic Oscillations in metals (Cambridge University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. N.Ja. Moskovchenko and V.Ja. Frenkel, Ehrenfest-Ioffe Nauchnaja Perepiska (Ehrenfest-Ioffe Scientific Correspondence) (Akademija Nauk SSSR, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. W.J. de Haas, J.W. Blom and L. Shubnikov, Über die Widerstandsänderung von Wismutkristallen im Magnetfeld bei tiefen Temperaturen, Physica 2 (1935) 907–915.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Pauli, Über Gasentartung und Paramagnetismus, Z. Phys. 41 (1927) 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Peierls, On the Theory of the Diamagnetism of Conductions Electrons II. Strong magnetic fields, Z. Phys. 81 (1933) 186–194.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Kapitza, Specific Resistance of Bismuth Crystal and its Change in Strong Magnetic Fields, Proc. Royal. Soc. A 119 (1928) 358–443.

    Google Scholar 

  25. O. Trapeznikowa, Untersuchung über den Einfluss van Druck und Zug auf den spezifischen Widerstand van Wismut Einkristallen, Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam 34 (1931) 84–843; Leiden Comm. no. 215c.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. J. Reinders .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reinders, L.J. (2018). Shubnikov’s Scientific Work in Leiden: Shubnikov—De Haas Effect. In: The Life, Science and Times of Lev Vasilevich Shubnikov. Springer Biographies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72098-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics