Skip to main content

Pluralist Economics: A Multi-paradigmatic Look

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Case Method and Pluralist Economics
  • 496 Accesses

Abstract

Any explanation of an economic phenomenon is based on a worldview. The premise of this book is that any worldview can be associated with one of the four broad paradigms: functionalist, interpretive, radical humanist, and radical structuralist. This chapter takes the major extant schools of thought in economics—Neo-Classical Economics, New Institutional Economics, Behavioral Economics, Austrian Economics, Post-Keynesian Economics, Institutional Economics, Radical Economics, and Marxist Economics—and locates each of them on the map of the four paradigms, as in Exhibit 12.1. It emphasizes, as pluralist economics does, that these schools of thought in economics are equally scientific and informative; they look at economic phenomena from their certain paradigmatic viewpoint; and together they provide a more balanced understanding of the economic phenomenon under consideration. In this chapter, Sects. 1 through 8 present eight major extant schools of thought in economics, and Sect. 9 concludes the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For this literature see Ansperger and Varoufakis (2006), Arrow and Debreu (1954), Blaug (1980), Boland (1991), Brown (1981), Davis (1989), Davis et al. (2004), Dowling and Chin-Fang (2007), Dugger (1979), Emmet (2010), Friedman (1953), Fulton (1984), Gee (1991), Hahn (1981), Heijdra and Lowenberg (1988), Hetzel (2007), Mirowski (1987), Reder (1982), Robbins (1937), Sherman et al. (2008), Stilwell (2012), Tollison (1989), Van Horn and Mirowski (2009), Van Overtveldt (2007), Walsh and Gram (1980), Weintraub (1985a, 1985b, 2008), and Wolff and Resnick (2012). This section is based on Lavoie (1992a, 1992b) and Ricketts (1988).

  2. 2.

    For this literature see Acemoglu (2003), Alchian and Demsetz (1972), Alston et al. (1996), Brousseau and Glachant (2008), Coase (1937, 1960, 1988, 1998), Coeurderoy and Quelin (1997), Crocker and Masten (1996), Davis and North (1971), Drobak and Nye (1997), Dugger (1990), Forbes and Lederman (2009, 2010), Furubotn and Richter (1991a, 1991b, 1998, 2008), Geyskens et al. (2006), Gibbons (2010), Groenewegen et al. (2010), Hodgson (1989a, 1989b), Hutchinson (1984), Joskow (1988, 2008), Klein (1999), Libecap and Smith (1999), Macher and Richman (2008), Medema (1998), Menard and Shirley (2005), North (1986, 1990, 1991, 1994), Ostrom (2005), Pratten (2004), Richter (2005), Rutherford (1994), Rutherford (2001), Shelanski and Klein (1995), Vannoni (2002), Vromen (1995), and Williamson (1975, 1985a, 1985b, 1996, 2000, 2010). This section is based on Furubotn and Richter (1991a).

  3. 3.

    For this literature see Altman (2006), Ariely (2008), Baddeley (2013), Baker and Nofsinger (2010), Barberis and Thaler (2003), Bardsley et al. (2010), Binmore (2008), Bruni and Sugden (2007), Camerer (2003, 2006), Camerer et al. (2004), Cartwright (2011), Cassar and Friedman (2004), Conlisk (1996), Della Vigna (2009), Diamond and Vartiainen (2007), Dowling and Chin-Fang (2007), Earl (1988), Earl (1990), Forbes (2009), Frey and Benz (2004), Fudenberg (2006), Gilad and Kaish (1986), Kahneman and Tversky (1979), List (2004), Maital (2007), Mullainathan and Thaler (2000), Pesendorfer (2006), Pompian (2012), Rabin (1998), Ricciardi and Simon (2000), Roth (1995), Schmidt et al. (2008), Sent (2004), Shefrin (2002), Shiller (2003), Shiv and Fedorikhin (1999), Simon (1955, 1998), Thaler (2005, 2008a, 2008b), Tomer (2007), Tversky and Kahneman (1974, 1981), Van Raaij (1991), and Velupillai and Chen (2012). This section is based on Camerer et al. (2004).

  4. 4.

    For this literature see Backhaus (2005), Barry (1991), Boettke (1989, 1994, 1996), Boettke and Prychitko (1994), Dolan (1976), Gloria-Palermo (1999), Grassl and Smith (1986), Hall and Martin (2011), Kirzner (1981, 1992, 2000), Koppl (2008), Koppl et al. (2010), Lachmann (1998), Lewis (2004), Littlechild (1990), Loasby (1991), Meijer (1995), von Mises (1962, 1966), Rima (2013a, 2013b), Menger (1981), Samuels (1989), Shand (1984, 1990), and Vaughn (1994). This section is based on Boettke (2010).

  5. 5.

    For this literature see Arestis (1990, 1996), Arestis et al. (1999), Arestis and Skouras (1985), Bohm (1989), Brown (1981), Crotty (1980), Davidson (1981), Dow (1988, 1990, 1991, 1996), Eichner (1979), Eichner and Kregel (1975), Hamouda and Harcourt (1988), Harcourt (1987, 2006), Hodgson (1989a, 1989b), Holt (2007), Holt and Pressman (2001, 2007), King (2003), Kregel (1975), Lavoie (1992a, 1992b), Lawson (1994, 1999), Lee (2002, 2009), Lee and Lavoie (2012), McKenna and Zannoni (1993), Palley (1996), Papadimitriou and Wray (2010), Pheby (1989), Rothem (1999), Sawyer (1988), Sawyer (1991), and Walters and Young (1997, 1999). This section is based on Arestis (1992).

  6. 6.

    For this literature see Ayers (1951), Boettke (1989), Bowles (1998), Commons (1931, 1934, 1936), Dugger (1990), Dugger and Sherman (1994), Gruchy (1957, 1969, 1972, 1987), Hodgson (1988, 1989a, 1989b, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004a, 2004b), Hodgson et al. (1994), Hutchinson (1984), Kapp (1968, 1976, 2011), Lawson (2005), Miller (1978), Milonakis and Fine (2008), Mirowski (1987), Myrdal (1978), Nelson and Sampat (2001), O’Hara (2007), Peterson (1987), Rima (2013a, 2013b), Rutherford (1994), Rutherford (2001), Sackrey et al. (2008), Samuels (1988, 1989), Schlicht (1998), Stanfield (1999), Stilwell (2012), Tool (1981, 1988a, 1988b), Tool and Bush (2003), Wilber and Harrison (1978), Whalen (1996), and Witte (1954). This section is based on Miller (1978).

  7. 7.

    For this literature see Albert et al. (1986), Amariglio et al. (1996), Amariglio et al. (1993), Amariglio and Ruccio (1994), Arestis and Sawyer (1994), Baiman et al. (2000), Bowles and Edwards (1990), Cullenberg (1994), Dugger and Sherman (1994), Edwards and MacEwan (1970), Hahnel (2002), Kotz et al. (1994), Lippit (1996), Milberg (1991), Nell (1981), O’Connor (1984, 1994), Palermo (2007), Panitch and Leys (1999), Prychitko (1998), Resnick and Wolff (1987), Roberts and Feiner (1992), Sawyer (1989), Scott (1991), Sherman (1987), Ward (1977), and Wolff and Resnick (2012). This section is based on Wiesskopf (1992).

  8. 8.

    For this literature see Amin (1974, 1988), Baran and Sweezy (1966), Brewer (2001), Desai (1979), Fine (1980), Foster and McChesney (2004), Howard and King (1975, 1992), King (1990), Kotz (1991), Mandel (1968), McLellan (2000), Mermelstein (1970), Panitch and Leys (1999), Scott (1991), Singer (1999), Stilwell (2012), Sweezy (1942), Sweezy and Magdoff (1972), Wallerstein (1974), and Warren (1980). This section is based on Wiesskopf (1992).

References

  • Acemoglu, D. 2003. Root Causes: A Historical Approach to Assessing the Role of Institutions in Economic Development. Finance and Development 40 (2): 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Michael, Leslie Cagan, Noam Chomsky, Robin Hahnel, Mel King, Lydia Sargent, and Holly Sklar. 1986. Liberating Theory. New York, NY: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, Armen, and H. Demsetz. 1972. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. American Economic Review 62: 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J., G.D. Libecap, and R. Schneider. 1996. The Determinants and Impact of Property Rights: Land Titles on the Brazilian Frontier. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 12: 25–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, Morris. 2006. Handbook of Contemporary Behavioral Economics: Foundations and Developments. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amariglio, Jack, Antonio Callari, Stephen Resnick, David Ruccio, and Richard D. Wolff. 1996. Chapter 8: Nondeterminist Marxism: The Birth of a Postmodern Tradition in Economics. In Beyond Neoclassical Economics: Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory, ed. Fred E. Foldvary, 134–147. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amariglio, Jack, Stephen Resnik, and Richard D. Wolff. 1993. Division and Difference in the ‘Discipline’ of Economics. Critical Inquiry 17: 108–137. Reprinted in Messer-Davidow, E, Shumway, D.R., and Sylvan, D.J., eds. 1994. Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottsville, VA: University of Virginia Press, pp. 150–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amariglio, Jack, and David F. Ruccio. 1994. Postmodernism, Marxism, and the Critique of Modern Economic Thought. Rethinking Marxism 7 (3): 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, Samir. 1974. Accumulation on a World Scale: A Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. Accumulation on a World Scale: Thirty Years Later. Rethinking Marxism 1 (2): 54–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansperger, Christian, and Yanis Varoufakis. 2006. What is Neoclassical Economics. Post-Autistic Review 38 (1): 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, Philip. 1990. Post-Keynesianism: A New Approach to Economics. Review of Social Economy 48 (3): 222–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. The Post-Keynesian Approach to Economics: An Alternative Analysis of Economic Theory and Policy. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Post-Keynesian Economics: Towards Coherence. Cambridge Journal of Economics 20: 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, Philip, Stephen P. Dunn, and Malcolm Sawyer. 1999. Post Keynesian Economics and Its Critics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 21 (4): 527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, Philip, and Malcolm Sawyer, eds. 1994. The Elgar Companion to Radical Political Economy. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, Philip, and Thanos Skouras, eds. 1985. Post Keynesian Economic Theory: A Challenge to Neo-Classical Economics. Brighton, England: Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J., and G. Debreu. 1954. Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Econometrica 22 (3): 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. 2008. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, Clarence E. 1951. The Co-Ordinates of Institutionalism. American Economic Review 41: 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, Jurgen G., ed. 2005. Modern Applications of Austrian Thought. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, Michelle. 2013. Behavioral Economics and Finance. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, Ron, Heather Boushey, and Dawn Saunders, eds. 2000. Political Economy and Contemporary Capitalism: Radical Perspectives on Economic Theory and Policy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. Kent, and John R. Nofsinger, eds. 2010. Behavioral Finance: Investors, Corporations, and Markets. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran, Paul, and Paul Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly Capital. London, England: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, Nicholas, and Richard Thaler. 2003. A Survey of Behavioral Finance. In Handbook of the Economics of Finance, ed. G.M. Constantinides, M. Harris, and R. Stulz. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley, N., R. Cubitt, G. Loomes, P. Moffat, C. Starmer, and R. Sugden. 2010. Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Norman P. 1991. Chapter 5: Austrian Economics: A Dissent from Orthodoxy. In Companion to Contemporary Economic Thought, ed. David Greenaway, Michael Bleaney, and Ian Stewart, 68–87. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, Ken. 2008. Review of Behavioral Economics and Its Applications. Economic Journal 118 (529): 248–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark. 1980. Economic Methodology in One Easy Lesson. British Review of Economic Issues 2 (5): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, Peter J. 1989. Evolution and Economics: Austrian as Institutionalists. Research in the History of Thought and Methodology 6: 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 1994. The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Chapter 2: What Is Wrong with Neoclassical Economics (and What Is Still Wrong with Austrian Economics)? In Beyond Neoclassical Economics: Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory, ed. Fred E. Foldvary, 22–40. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Handbook on Contemporary Austrian Economics. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, Peter J., and David L. Prychitko, eds. 1994. The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics. Brookfield, Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, Stephan. 1989. Chapter 4: Subjectivism and Post-Keynesianism: Towards a Better Understanding. In New Directions in Post-Keynesian Economics, ed. John Pheby, 59–93. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, Lawrence A. 1991. Chapter 6: Current Views on Economic Positivism. In Companion to Contemporary Economic Thought, ed. David Greenaway, Michael Bleaney, and Ian Stewart, 88–104. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Samuel. 1998. Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 75–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Samuel, and Richard Edwards, eds. 1990. Radical Political Economy, Volumes I and II. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Anthony. 2001. Marxist Theories of Imperialism: A Critical Survey. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, Eric, and Jean-Michel Glachant, eds. 2008. New Institutional Economics: A Guidebook. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Elba K. 1981. The Neoclassical and Post-Keynesian Research Programs: The Methodological Issues. Review of Social Economy 39 (2): 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L., and R. Sugden. 2007. The Road Not Taken: How Psychology Was Removed from Economics, and How It Might Be Brought Back. Economic Journal 117: 146–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, Colin F. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Behavioral Economics. In Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, ed. Richard Blundell, Whitney K. Newey, and Rorsten Persson, vol. II. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, Colin F., George Loewenstein, and Matthew Rabin, eds. 2004. Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Edward. 2011. Behavioral Economics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, A., and D. Friedman. 2004. Economics Lab: An Introduction to Experimental Economics. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4 (16): 386–405. Reprinted in Coase, Ronald H. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1): 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. The New Institutional Economics. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 88 (2): 72–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coeurderoy, R., and B. Quelin. 1997. Transaction Cost Theory: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Vertical Integration. Review of Economic Policy 107 (2): 145–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, John R. 1931. Institutional Economics. American Economic Review 21 (4): 648–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1934. Institutional Economics. London, England: Mamillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1936. Institutional Economics. American Economic Review 26 (1): 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlisk, J. 1996. Why Bounded Rationality. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 669–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, K.J., and S.E. Masten. 1996. Regulation and Administered Contracts Revisited: Lesson from Transaction-Cost Economics for Public Utility Regulation. Journal of Regulation Economics 9: 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, James R. 1980. Post-Keynesian Economic Theory: An Overview and Evaluation. American Economic Review 70 (2): 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullenberg, Stephen. 1994. The Falling Rate of Profit: Recasting the Marxian Debate. Boulder, CO: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Paul. 1981. Chapter 10: Post Keynesian Economics: Solving the Crisis in Economic Theory. In The Crisis in Economic Theory, ed. Daniel Bell and Irving Kristol, 151–173. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, John B. 1989. Axiomatic General Equilibrium Theory and Referentiality. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 11 (3): 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, John B., Alain Marciano, and Jochen Runde, eds. 2004. The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Lance E., and Douglass C. North. 1971. Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Della Vigna, Stefano. 2009. Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 315–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, Meghnad. 1979. Marxian Economics. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Peter, and Hannu Vartiainen. 2007. Behavioral Economics and Its Applications. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, Edwin G., ed. 1976. The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City, KS: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, Sheila C. 1988. Post Keynesian Economics: Conceptual Underpinnings. British Review of Economic Issues 10 (23): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Post Keynesianism as Political Economy: A Methodological Discussion. Review of Political Economy 2 (3): 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Chapter 7: The Post-Keynesian School. In A Modern Guide to Economic Thought: An Introduction to Comparative Schools of Thought in Economics, ed. Douglas Mair and Anne G. Miller, 176–206. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. The Methodology of Macroeconomics Thought: A Conceptual Analysis of Schools of Thought in Economics. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, John Malcolm, and Yap Chin-Fang. 2007. Modern Developments in Behavioral Economics: Social Science Perspectives on Choice and Decision Making. London, England: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drobak, John N., and John V.C. Nye, eds. 1997. The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, William M. 1979. Methodological Differences Between Institutional and Neoclassical Economics. Journal of Economic Issues 13 (4): 899–909. Reprinted in Samuels, Warren J., ed. 1988. Institutional Economics, Volumes I, II, and III. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing, Chapter 5, pp. 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. The New Institutionalism: New But Not Institutionalist. Journal of Economic Issues 24 (2): 423–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, William M., and Howard J. Sherman. 1994. Comparisons of Marxism and Institutionalism. Journal of Economic Issues 28 (1): 101–127. Reprinted in Prychitko, David L., ed. 1998. Why Economists Disagree: An Introduction to the Alternative Schools of Thought, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, Chapter 9, pp. 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, Peter E., ed. 1988. Behavioral Economics, volumes I and II. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Economics and Psychology: A Survey. Economic Journal 100: 718–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Richard, and Arthur MacEwan. 1970. A Radical Approach to Economics: Basis for a New Curriculum. American Economic Review 60 (2): 352–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichner, Alfred S., ed. 1979. A Guide to Post-Keynesian Economics. While Plains, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichner, Alfred S., and J.A. Kregel. 1975. An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 13 (4): 1293–1314. Reprinted in Prychitko, David L., ed. 1998. Why Economists Disagree: An Introduction to the Alternative Schools of Thought, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, Chapter 5, pp. 83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmet, Ross B., ed. 2010. The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Ben. 1980. Economic Theory and Ideology. London, England: Edward Arnold Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, Silke Januszewski, and Mara Lederman. 2009. Adaptation and Vertical Integration in the Airline Industry. American Economic Review 99 (5): 1831–1849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Does Vertical Integration Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from the Airline Industry. RAND Journal of Economics 41 (4): 765–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, W. 2009. Behavioral Finance. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, John Bellamy, and Robert W. McChesney. 2004. Pox Americana: Exposing the American Empire. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno S., and Matthias Benz. 2004. Chapter 4: From Imperialism to Inspiration: A Survey of Economics and Psychology. In The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, ed. John B. Davis, Alain Marciano, and Jochen Runde, 61–83. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, Drew. 2006. Advancing beyond Advances in Behavioral Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 44 (3): 694–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, G. 1984. Research Programmes in Economics. History of Political Economy 16 (2): 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn, Eirik G., and Rudolf Richter. 1991a. The New Institutional Economics: An Assessment. In The New Institutional Economics: A Collection of Articles from the Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, ed. Eirik G. Furubotn and Rudolf Richter, 1–32. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, eds. 1991b. The New Institutional Economics: A Collection of Articles from the Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The New Institutional Economics: A Different Approach to Economic Analysis. Economic Affairs 28 (3): 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.M. Alec. 1991. Chapter 4: The Neoclassical School. In A Modern Guide to Economic Thought: An Introduction to Comparative Schools of Thought in Economics, ed. Douglas Mair and Anne G. Miller, 71–108. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, Inge, Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp, and Nirmalya Kumar. 2006. Make, Buy, or Ally: A Meta-Analysis of Transaction Cost Theory. Academy of Management Journal 49 (3): 519–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Robert S. 2010. Transaction-Cost Economics: Past, Present, and Future? Scandinavian Journal of Economics 112 (2): 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, Benjamin, and Stanley Kaish, eds. 1986. Handbook of Behavioral Economics, Volumes A and B. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloria-Palermo, Sandye. 1999. The Evolution of Austrian Economics: From Menger to Lachmann. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassl, Wolfgang, and Barry Smith, eds. 1986. Austrian Economics: Historical and Philosophical Background. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewegen, John, Spithoven, Antoon, and Van Den Berg, Annette, (2010), Institutional Economics: An Introduction, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruchy, Allan Garfield. 1957. Institutional Economics, A New Look at Institutionalism: Discussion. American Economic Review 47 (Suppl 2): 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1969. Neoinstitutionalism and the Economics of Dissent. Journal of Economic Issues 3: 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972. Contemporary Economic Thought: The Contribution of Neo-Institutional Economics. Clifton, NJ: Augustus Kelley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. The Reconstruction of Economics: An Analysis of the Fundamentals of Institutional Economics. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Frank. 1981. Chapter 8: General Equilibrium Theory. In The Crisis in Economic Theory, ed. Daniel Bell and Irving Kristol, 123–138. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahnel, Robin. 2002. The ABCs of Political Economy: A Modern Approach. London, England: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamouda, O.F., and G.C. Harcourt. 1988. Post Keynesianism: From Criticism to Coherence? Bulletin of Economic Research 40 (1): 1–33. Reprinted in Pheby, J., ed. 1988. New Directions in Post-Keynesian Economics, Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G.C. 1987. Post-Keynesian Economics. In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, ed. John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman, vol. 3, 924–928. London, England: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Structure of Post-Keynesian Economics: The Core Contributions of the Pioneers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heijdra, Ben J., and Anthon D. Lowenberg. 1988. The Neoclassical Economic Research Program: Some Lakatosian and other Considerations. Australian Economic Papers 27 (1): 272–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetzel, Robert L. 2007. The Contributions of Milton Friedman to Economics. Economic Quarterly 93 (1): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, Geoffrey Martin. 1988. Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989a. Institutional Economic Theory: The Old versus the New. Review of Political Economy 1 (3): 249–270. Reprinted in Prychitko, David L., ed. 1998. Why Economists Disagree: An Introduction to the Alternative Schools of Thought, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, Chapter 7, pp. 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989b. Chapter 5: Post-Keynesianism and Institutionalism: The Missing Link. In New Directions in Post-Keynesian Economics, ed. John Pheby, 94–123. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. The Approach of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 166–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues 34 (2): 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2002. A Modern Reader in Institutional and Evolutionary Economics: Key Concepts. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2003. Recent Developments in Institutional Economics. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004a. The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004b. Chapter 5: Institutional Economics: From Menger and Veblen to Coase and North. In The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, ed. John B. Davis, Alain Marciano, and Jochen Runde, 84–101. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, Geoffrey Martin, Warren J. Samuels, and Marc R. Tool, eds. 1994. The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, Richard P.F. 2007. Chapter 6: What is Post Keynesian Economics. In Post-Keynesian Macroeconomics: Essays in Honor of Ingrid Rima, ed. Mathew Forstater, Gary Mongiovi, and Steven Pressman, 89–107. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, Richard P.F., and Steven Pressman, eds. 2001. A New Guide to Post Keynesian Economics. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, eds. 2007. Empirical Post Keynesian Economics: Looking at the Real World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M.C., and J.E. King. 1975. The Political Economy of Marx. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. A History of Marxian Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Joshua C., and Adam Martin. 2011. Austrian Economics: Methodology, Concepts, and Implications for Economic Education. Journal of Economics and Finance Education 10 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, Terence W. 1984. Institutional Economics Old and New. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 140: 20–29. Reprinted in Furubotn, Eirik G., and Rudolf Richter., eds. 1991. The New Institutional Economics: A Collection of Articles from the Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, Paul L. 1988. Asset Specifity and the Structure of Vertical Relationships: Empirical Evidence. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4: 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Introduction to New Institutional Economics: A Report Card. In New Institutional Economics: A Guidebook, ed. Eric Brousseau and Jean-Michel Glachant, 1–19. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, K. William. 1968. In Defense of Institutional Economics. Swedish Journal of Economics 70: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. The Nature and Significance of Institutional Economics. Kyklos 29 (2): 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, Karl William. 2011. The Foundations of Institutional Economics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, John E., ed. 1990. Marxian Economics, Volumes I, II, and III. Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 2003. The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, Israel M. 1981. Chapter 7: The ‘Austrian’ Perspective. In The Crisis in Economic Theory, ed. Daniel Bell and Irving Kristol, 111–122. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. The Meaning of Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Driving Force of the Market: Essays in Austrian Economics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P. 1999. New Institutional Economics. In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, ed. B. Bouckaert and G. De Geest, vol. 1. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, Roger, ed. 2008. Explorations in Austrian Economics. Bingley, England: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, Roger, Steven Horwitz, and Pierre Desrochers, eds. 2010. Advances in Austrian Economics: What Is So Austrian about Austrian Economics? Bingley, England: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, David M. 1991. Accumulation, Money, and Credit in the Circuit of Capital. Rethinking Marxism 4 (2): 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, David M., Terrence McDonough, and Michael Reich, eds. 1994. Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kregel, J.A. 1975. The Reconstruction of Political Economy: An Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics. London, England: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, Ludwig M. 1998. Chapter 3: From Mises to Shackle: An Essay on Austrian Economics and the Kaleidic Society. In Why Economists Disagree: An Introduction to the Alternative Schools of Thought, ed. David L. Prychitko, 53–66. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, Marc. 1992a. Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992b. Toward a New Research Programme for Post-Keynesianism and Neo-Ricardianism. Review of Political Economy 4 (1): 37–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Tony. 1994. The Nature of Post Keynesianism and Its Links to other Traditions: A Realist Perspective. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 16 (4): 503–538. Reprinted in Prychitko, David L., ed. 1998. Why Economists Disagree: An Introduction to the Contemporary Schools of Thought, New York, NY: State University of New York Press, Chapter 6, pp. 115–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Connections and Distinctions: Post Keynesianism and Critical Realism. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 22 (1): 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. The Nature of Institutional Economics. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 2 (1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Frederic S. 2002. Theory Foundation and Methodological Foundations of Post Keynesian Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (4): 789–804. Reprinted in Downward, Paul., ed. 2003. Applied Economics and the Critical Realist Critique, New York, NY: Routledge.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Chapter 5: The History of Post Keynesian Economics in America, 1971-95. In A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the Twentieth Century, ed. Frederic S. Lee, 78–96. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Frederic S., and Marc Lavoie. 2012. In Defense of Post-Keynesian and Heterodox Economics: Responses to Their Critics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Paul A. (2004). Structure and Agency in Economic Analysis: The Case of Austrian Economics and the Material Embeddedness of Socio-Economic Life. In Davis, John B., List, John. (2004). Neoclassical Theory versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace. Econometrica, 72 (2), 615–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libecap, G.D., and J.L. Smith. 1999. The Self-Enforcing Provisions of Oil and Gas Unit Operating Agreements: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15 (2): 526–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippit, Victor D., ed. 1996. Radical Political Economy: Explorations in Alternative Economic Analysis. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, John. 2004. Neoclassical Theory versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace. Econometrica 72 (2): 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, Stephen, ed. 1990. Austrian Economics. Vol. I, II, III. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, Brian J. 1991. Chapter 3: The Austrian School. In A Modern Guide to Economic Thought: An Introduction to Comparative Schools of Thought in Economics, ed. D. Mair and A.G. Miller, 40–70. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macher, J.T., and B.D. Richman. 2008. Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences. Business and Politics 10 (1): 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maital, Shlomo, ed. 2007. Recent Developments in Behavioral Economics. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, Ernest. 1968. Marxist Economic Theory. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, Edward J., and Diane C. Zannoni. 1993. Philosophical Foundations of Post Keynesian Economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 15 (3): 395–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, David, ed. 2000. Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema, Steven, ed. 1998. Coasian Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, Gerrit, ed. 1995. New Perspectives on Austrian Economics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, Claude, and Mary M. Shirley, eds. 2005. Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, Carl. 1981. Principles of Economics. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mermelstein, David, ed. 1970. Economics: Mainstream Readings and Radical Critiques. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milberg, William. 1991. Marxism, Poststructuralism, and the Discourse of Economics. Rethinking Marxism 4 (2): 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Edythes S. 1978. Institutional Economics: Philosophy, Methodology and Theory. Social Science Journal 15 (1): 13–25. Reprinted in Samuels, Warren J., ed. 1988. Institutional Economics, Volume II, Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing, Chapter 3, pp. 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milonakis, Dimitris, and Ben Fine. 2008. From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and the Historical in the Evolution of Economic Theory. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip. 1987. The Philosophical Bases of Institutionalist Economics. Journal of Economic Issues 21 (3): 1001–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Richard Thaler. 2000. Behavioral Economics. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, Gunnar. 1978. Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues 12 (4): 771–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nell, Edward J. 1981. Chapter 11: Value and Capital in Marxian Economics. In The Crisis in Economic Theory, ed. Daniel Bell and Irving Kristol, 174–200. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R., and Bhaven N. Sampat. 2001. Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 44 (1): 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. 1986. The New Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 142: 230–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Economic Performance through Time. American Economic Review 84 (3): 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, James. 1984. Accumulation Crisis. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, Martin, ed. 1994. Is Capitalism Sustainable?: Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology. New York, NY: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, Phillip Anthony. 2007. Principles of Institutional-Evolutionary Political Economy: Converging Themes from the Schools of Heterodoxy. Journal of Economic Issues 41 (1): 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Chapter 30: Doing Institutional Analysis: Digging Deeper than Markets and Hierarchies. In Handbook of New Institutional Economics, ed. Claude Menard and Mary M. Shirley, 819–848. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, Giulio. 2007. The Ontology of Economic Power in Capitalism: Mainstream Economics and Marx. Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (4): 539–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palley, Thomas I. 1996. Post Keynesian Economics: Debt, Distribution and the Macro Economy. New York, NY: St. Matin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou, Dimitri B., and L. Randall Wray, eds. 2010. The Elgar Companion to Hyman Minsky. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, Leo, and Colin Leys, eds. 1999. Global Capitalism versus Democracy: Socialist Register 1999. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesendorfer, Wolfgang. 2006. Behavioral Economics Comes of Age: A Review Essay on Advances in Behavioral Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 44 (3): 712–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Wallace C. 1987. Macroeconomic Theory and Policy in an Institutionalist Perspective. Journal of Economic Issues 21 (4): 1587–1622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pheby, John, ed. 1989. New Directions in Post-Keynesian Economics. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompian, Michael M. 2012. Behavioral Finance and Wealth Management: How to Build Investment Strategies that Account for Investor Biases. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pratten, Stephen. 2004. Chapter 17: The Conflict Between Formalism and Realisticness in Modern Economics: The Case of the New Institutional Economics. In The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, ed. John B. Davis, Alain Marciano, and Jochen Runde, 339–363. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prychitko, David L., ed. 1998. Why Economists Disagree: An Introduction to the Alternative Schools of Thought. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, Matthew. 1998. Psychology and Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, Melvin W. 1982. Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change. Journal of Economic Literature 20 (1): 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, Stephen A., and Richard D. Wolff. 1987. Knowledge and Class: A Marxian Critique of Political Economy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi, Victor, and Helen K. Simon. 2000. What Is Behavioral Finance? Business, Education and Technology Journal 2 (2): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, R. 2005. The New Institutional Economics: Its Start, Its Meaning, Its Prospects. European Business Organization Law Review 6: 161–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, Martin, ed. 1988. Neoclassical Microeconomics. Vol. I, II. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rima, Ingrid. 2013a. Chapter 8: German-Austrian Economics. In A Primer on Heterodox Economics, ed. Ingrid Rima. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. A Primer on Heterodox Economics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Lionell. 1937. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London, England: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Bruce, and Susan Feiner, eds. 1992. Radical Economics. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1995. Introduction to Experimental Economics. In Handbook of Experimental Economics, ed. J. Kagel and A. Roth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothem, Roy J. 1999. Post Keynesian Economics and Realist Philosophy. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 22 (1): 71–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, Malcolm. 1994. Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Institutional Economics: Then and Now. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (3): 173–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackrey, Charles, Geoffrey Schneider, and Janet Knoedler. 2008. Introduction to Political Economy. New York, NY: Dollars and Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, Warren J., ed. 1988. Institutional Economics. Vol. I, II, and III. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Austrian and Institutional Economics: Some Common Elements. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 6: 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, Malcolm C., ed. 1988. Post-Keynesian Economics. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. The Challenge of Radical Political Economy: An Introduction to the Alternatives to Neoclassical Economics. Savage, MD: Barnes and Noble Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Chapter 11: Post-Keynesian Macroeconomics. In Companion to Contemporary Economic Thought, ed. David Greenaway, Michael Bleaney, and Ian Stewart, 184–206. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlicht, Ekkehart. 1998. Chapter 15: The Texture of Customs. In On Custom in the Economy, 269–275. Oxford, England: Claredon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, U., C. Starmer, and R. Sugden. 2008. Third Generation Prospect Theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36: 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Andrew. 1991. Chapter 9: Marxian and Radical Economics. In A Modern Guide to Economic Thought: An Introduction to Comparative Schools of Thought in Economics, ed. Douglas Mair and Anne G. Miller, 233–262. Aldershot, Hants, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sent, E.M. 2004. Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back into Economics. History of Political Economy 36: 735–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shand, Alexander H. 1984. The Capitalist Alternative: An Introduction to Neo-Austrian Economics. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Free Market Morality: The Political Economy of the Austrian School. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin, Hersh. 2002. Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shelanski, Howard A., and Peter G. Klein. 1995. Empirical Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11 (2): 335–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Howard J. 1987. Foundations of Radical Political Economy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Howard J., E.K. Hunt, Reynold F. Nesiba, Philip A. O’Hara, and Barbara Wiens-Tuers. 2008. Economics: An Introduction to Traditional and Progressive Views. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R.J. 2003. From Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17: 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiv, B., and A. Fedorikhin. 1999. Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in consumer Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research 26: 278–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1955. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Behavioral Economics. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, vol. 1. London, England: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Daniel. 1999. Whose Millennium? Theirs or Ours? New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield, James Ronald. 1999. The Scope, Method, and Significance of Original Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues 33 (2): 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stilwell, Frank. 2012. Political Economy: The Contest of Economic Ideas. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy, Paul M. 1942. The Theory of Capitalist Development: Principles of Marxian Political Economy. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy, Paul M., and Harry Magdoff. 1972. The Dynamics of U.S. Capitalism: Corporate Structure, Inflation, Credit, Gold, and the Dollar. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R.H., ed. 2005. Advances in Behavioral Finance. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundations.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008a. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice: Anatomy of a Failure. Marketing Science 27: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science 27: 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, Robert D. 1989. Chicago Political Economy. Public Choice 63 (3): 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomer, John F. 2007. What Is Behavioral Economics? Journal of Socio-Economics 36 (3): 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tool, Marc R. 1981. The Compulsive Shift to Institutional Analysis. Journal of Economic Issues 15 (3): 569–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988a. Evolutionary Economics, Volume I: Foundations of Institutional Thought. Armonk, NY: M.E. Shape.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988b. Evolutionary Economics, Volume II: Institutional Theory and Policy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Shape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tool, Marc R., and Paul Dale Bush, eds. 2003. Institutional Analysis and Economic Policy. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211: 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, Robert, and Philip Mirowski. 2009. The Rise of Chicago School of Economics and the Birth of Neoliberalism. In The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, ed. P. Mirowski and D. Plehwe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannoni, D. 2002. Empirical Studies of Vertical Integration: The Transaction Cost Orthodoxy. International Review of Economics and Business 49: 113–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Overtveldt, Johan. 2007. The Chicago School: How the University of Chicago Assembled the Thinkers Who Revolutionized Economics and Business. Chicago, IL: Agate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Raaij, W. Fred. 1991. Chapter 40: Economics and Psychology. In Companion to Contemporary Economic Thought, ed. David Greenaway, Michael Bleaney, and Ian Stewart, 797–811. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, Karen I. 1994. Austrian Economics in America: The Migration of a Tradition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Velupillai, Kumaraswamy, and Shu-Heng Chen, eds. 2012. Behavioral Economics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, Ludwig. 1962. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science: An Essay on Method. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1966. Human Action: A Treaties on Economics. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vromen, Jack J. 1995. Economic Evolution: An Inquiry into the Foundations of New Institutional Economics. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Vivian, and Harvey Gram. 1980. Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium: Historical Origins and Mathematical Structure. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, Bernard, and David Young. 1997. On the Coherence of Post-Keynesian Economics. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 44 (3): 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Is Critical Realism the Appropriate Basis for Post Keynesianism? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 22 (1): 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Dwayne. 1977. Toward a Critical Political Economics: A Critique of Liberal and Radical Economic Thought. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Bill. 1980. Imperialism: Pioneer of Capitalism. London, England: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, E. Roy. 1985a. General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985b. Appraising General Equilibrium Analysis. Economics and Philosophy 1 (1): 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Mathematics and Economics. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, ed. Steven Durlauf and Lawrence Blume. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, Charles J. 1996. Chapter 5: The Institutional Approach to Political Economy. In Beyond Neoclassical Economics: Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory, ed. Fred E. Foldvary, 83–99. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesskopf, Thomas E. 1992. Toward a Socialism for the Future in the Wake of the Demise of the Socialism of the Past. Review of Radical Political Economics 24 (3/4). Reprinted in Prychitko, David L., ed. 1998. Why Economists Disagree: An Introduction to the Alternative Schools of Thought, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, Chapter 11, pp. 275–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, Charles K., and Robert S. Harrison. 1978. The Methodological Basis of Institutional Economics: Pattern Model, Story Telling, and Holism. Journal of Economic Issues 12 (1): 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985a. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets and Relational Contracting. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985b. Reflections on the New Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 141: 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Transaction Cost Economics: The Natural Progression. American Economic Review 100 (3): 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, Edwin E. 1954. Institutional Economics as Seen by an Institutional Economist. Southern Economic Journal 21 (2): 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Richard D., and Stephen A. Resnick. 2012. Contending Economic Theories: Neoclassical, Keynesian, and Marxian. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ardalan, K. (2018). Pluralist Economics: A Multi-paradigmatic Look. In: Case Method and Pluralist Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72071-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics