• Michaela Ott


The Introduction raises the question of whether the concepts of the individual and of individuality are still valid and epistemologically illuminative today. It speculates as to whether the human being can still be considered an “undivided” entity, given current microscopic observations, contemporary media practices, and the multi-directional orientations of the single person in composite cultures. It proposes that we think of the bio(techno)logical and socio(techno)logical participations, the recordings of living beings and the articulations of certain contemporary art practices as “dividuations” or “dividual processes”—terms derived from philosophical concepts coined by Gilbert Simondon and Gilles Deleuze. It also problematises the ambivalent status of these manifold participations, their affirmed or involuntary character, and the ensuing shifts in human subjectivations, asking that their impact be monitored.


  1. Ackerman, Jennifer: Titelthema Mikroben. Tausend Billionen Freunde, Spektrum der Wissenschaft (Heidelberg), November 2012, pp. 27–33.Google Scholar
  2. Agamben, Giorgio: Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998, p. 48.Google Scholar
  3. Agamben, Giorgio: Nudities, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011, p. 43.Google Scholar
  4. Agamben, Giorgio: What is an Apparatus? and Other Essays, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Balibar, Etienne: Equaliberty: Political Essays, Durham: Duke University Press, 2014, p. 68.Google Scholar
  6. Bayart, J.-F., Mbembe, A., and Toulabor, C.: Le Politique par le bas an Afrique noire, Paris, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, Ulrich: What is Globalization?, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Eve: Le nouvel ésprit du capitalisme, Paris: Gallimard, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. Burckhardt, Jacob: The Civilisation of the Renaissance in Italy, London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1892.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, Judith: Frames of War: When is Life Grievable?, London: Verso, 2009, p. 20.Google Scholar
  11. Castells, Manuel: Mobile Communication and Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  12. Clam, Jean: Orexis, désir, poursuite. une theorie de la désirance, Paris: Ganse arts et lettres, 2012.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, Gilles: Cinema 1: The Movement-Image, London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. Deleuze, Gilles: Difference and Repetition, New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, Gilles: Postscript on the Societies of Control, Vol. 59, October 1992, pp. 3–7.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix: Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  17. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix: A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
  18. Deleuze, Gilles: Logic of Sense, New York: Columbia University Press, 1990, p. 150.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, Michel: “Preface”, in: Gilles Deleuze/Félix Guattari, anti-oedipus. capitalism and schizophrenia, London: Athlone 2000, pp. xi–xiv: p. xiv.Google Scholar
  20. Galloway, Alexander R.: Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  21. Gernert, Johannes: “Dieses verdammte Internet” (interview with Katie Jacobs Stanton), die tageszeitung, Berlin, 15/16, September 2012, pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
  22. Habermas, Jürgen: Individuation through Socialization: On George Herbert Mead’s Theory of Subjectivity, in: J. Habermans (ed.), Postmetaphysical Thinking: Political Essays, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, Stuart: The Meaning of New Times, in: Stuart Hall and Martin Jacques (eds.), New Times: The Changing Face of Politics in the 1990s, London: Verso, 1990, pp. 116–134.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, Stuart: “The Question of Cultural Identity,” in: D. Held and T. McGrew (eds.), Modernity and its Futures, Cambridge: Polity, 1992, pp. 273–325.Google Scholar
  25. Hansen, Mark B.N.: “Medien des 21. Jahrhunderts, technisches Empfinden und unsere originaere Umweltbedingung,” in: Erich Hoerl (ed.), Die technologische Bedingung. Beitraege zur Beschreibung der technischen Welt, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 2011, pp. 365–409.Google Scholar
  26. Hansen, Mark B.N.: Feed-Forward: On the Future of Twenty-First-Century Media, University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  27. Hayles, N. Katherine: How We Think. Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis, Chicago, 2012.Google Scholar
  28. Kittler, Friedrich: Austreibung des Geistes aus den Geisteswissenschaften, Paderborn/München: Schoeningh, 1980.Google Scholar
  29. Lovink, Geert: “Eine Welt jenseits von Facebook. Alternative soziale Medien. Die Forschungsagenda des Netzwerks Unlike Us,” in: L. Engell and B. Siegert (eds.), Zeitschrift fuer Medien und Kulturforschung, Weimar, 2/2012, pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
  30. Luhmann, Niklas: The Theory of Society, Vol. 2, trans. Rhodes Barrett, California: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  31. McLuhan, Marshall: Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man, London: Routledge, 1964.Google Scholar
  32. MetroZones (ed.): Faith is the Place. The Urban Culture of Global Prayers, Berlin: Assoziation A, 2012.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, Vincent: Understanding Digital Culture, Los Angeles/London: Sage, 2011.Google Scholar
  34. Raunig, Gerald: “Etwas mehr als das Commune. Dividuum und Condividualitaet,” in: grundrisse 35. Zeitschrift fuer Linke Theorie, Wien, 2011.Google Scholar
  35. Simmel, Georg: On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings, Chicago University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  36. Stiegler, Bernhard: Denken bis an die Grenze der Maschine, Berlin: Diaphanes, 2009.Google Scholar
  37. Whitehead, A.N.: Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology. Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of Edinburgh during the Session 1927–1928, New York: Macmillan; Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1929.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michaela Ott
    • 1
  1. 1.BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations