Advertisement

Access-Based Consumption: A New Business Model for Luxury and Secondhand Fashion Business?

  • Amira Battle
  • Daniella Ryding
  • Claudia E. Henninger
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Advances in Luxury book series (PAAL)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the concept of access-based consumption (ABC) within the context of the UK’s secondhand luxury fashion industry. ABC has received increased interest and implies temporarily being able to use and experience a good/service without making a transaction that transfers ownership of goods/services. A proliferation of business models has emerged that embrace the concept of ABC, all of which share one communality: a consumption experience on the consumer side. This chapter presents various forms of ABC models and critically evaluates their relevance within the context of secondhand luxury and vintage fashion. This topic is new and fills a gap in the current retail fashion literature, particularly from a sustainability perspective. Sustainability, having developed as a megatrend in recent years, is having significant impacts on the retail fashion landscape. In sum, these business models suggest that the ultimate desire of consumers is moving from ownership towards experience. This chapter seeks to contribute to knowledge by investigating an emerging phenomenon within an under-researched context. More specifically, ABC models within the creative and cultural industries are examined. Furthermore, this research explores the business motivations of establishing an ABC model, as well as an insight into consumer motivations and shopper orientations for renting and swapping merchandise in a luxury fashion context.

Keywords

Access-based consumption ABC Sustainability Business models Consumption 

References

  1. Albinsson, P. A., & Perera, B. Y. (2012). Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: Building community through sharing events. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(4), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antikainen, M., Lammi, M., Paloheimo, H., Rüppel, T., & Valkokari, K. (2015). Towards circular economy business models: Consumer acceptance of novel services. In ISPIM Innovation Summit. ISPIM.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, C., & Lang, C. (2013). Sustainable product service systems: The new frontier in apparel retailing? Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 17(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, C., Niinimäki, K., Kujala, S., Karell, E., & Lang, C. (2015). Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: Exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong, C. M., Niinimäki, K., Lang, C., & Kujala, S. (2016). A use-oriented clothing economy? Preliminary affirmation for sustainable clothing consumption alternatives. Sustainable Development, 24, 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belk, R., (2007). Why not share rather than own? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611, 126–140.Google Scholar
  8. Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassidy, T. D., & Bennett, H. R. (2012). The rise of vintage fashion and the vintage consumer. Fashion Practice, 4(2), 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Catulli, M., Lindley, J. K., Reed, N. B., Green, A., Hyseni, H., & Kiri, S. (2014). What is mine is not yours: Further insight on what access-based consumption says about consumers. In R. W. Belk, L. Price, & L. Penaloza, (Eds.), Consumer culture theory—research in consumer behaviour. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Cervellon, M. C., Carey, L., & Harms, T. (2012). Something old, something used. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40(12), 956–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. “Chic By Choice”. Chicbychoice.com. Web. 18 June 2017.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, S., & Hodges, N. (2015). Exploring non-ownership apparel consumption through online fashion product rental services: An application of institutional theory. In International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) Annual Conference Proceedings. ITAA [online]. Retrieved March 6, 2017, from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1135&context=itaa_proceedings.
  14. Corvellec, H., & Stål, H. (2017). Evidencing the waste effect of product-service systems (PSSs). Journal of Cleaner Production, 145, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edbring, E., Lehner, M., & Mont, O. (2016). Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: Motivations and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferraro, C., Sands, S., & Brace-Govan, J. (2016). The role of fashionability in second-hand shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 32, 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. FFF (Forum of the Future). (2010). Fashion Futures 2025: Global scenarios for a sustainable fashion industry. FFF [online]. Retrieved March 5, 2017, from https://www.forumforthefuture.org/sites/default/files/project/downloads/fashionfutures2025finalsml.pdf.
  18. Gerval, O. (2008). Fashion: Concept to catwalk. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  19. Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2015). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henninger, C. E., Alevizou, P. J., Tan, J., Huang, Q., & Ryding, D. (2017). Consumption strategies and motivations of Chinese consumers—The case of UK sustainable luxury fashion. Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management, 21(3), 419–434.Google Scholar
  21. Lang, C., & Armstrong, C. (2015). What’s mine is yours: Does fashion leadership impede clothing renting and swapping? In International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) Annual Conference Proceedings. International Textile and Apparel Association, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. “Lena The Library”. Lena-library.com. Web. 18 June 2017.Google Scholar
  23. McColl, J., Canning, C., McBride, L., Nobbs, K., & Shearer, L. (2013). It’s vintage darling! An exploration of vintage fashion retailing. Journal of the Textile Institute, 104(2), 140–150. Web.Google Scholar
  24. Millard, E. (2016). Vestiaire collective: Clothes swap. Luxury London [online]. Retrieved June 27, 2017, from http://www.luxurylondon.co.uk/article/vestiaire-collective-clothes-swap.
  25. Mont, O., Dalhammar, C., & Jacobsson, N. (2006). A new business model for baby prams based on leasing and product remanufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1509–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Okonkwo, U. (2010). Luxury fashion branding. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Pedersen, E. R. G., & Netter, S. (2015). Collaborative consumption: Business model opportunities and barriers for fashion libraries. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 19(3), 258–273.Google Scholar
  28. Perlacia, A., Duml, V., & Saebi, T. (2016). Collaborative consumption: Live fashion, don’t own it. SSRN [online]. Retrieved June 27, 2017, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2860021.
  29. Pike, H. (2016). Will the ‘sharing economy’ work for fashion? Business of Fashion [online]. Retrieved March 5, 2017, from https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/fashion-tech/will-the-sharing-economy-work-for-fashion-rent-the-runway-rental.
  30. Stål, H., & Jansson, J. (2017). Sustainable consumption and value propositions: Exploring product-service system practices among Swedish fashion firms. Sustainable Development, 25(6), 546–558.Google Scholar
  31. “Style Lend”. Style Lend. Web. 18 June 2017.Google Scholar
  32. Swamynathan, G., et al. (2008). Do social networks improve e-commerce? A study on social marketplaces. In SIGCOMM 2008 (pp. 1–6). New York: ACM. Web. 18 June 2017.Google Scholar
  33. “Swap Style”. Swapstyle.com. Web. 18 June 2017.Google Scholar
  34. Turunen, L., & Leipämaa-Leskinen, H. (2015). Pre-loved luxury: Identifying the meanings of second-hand luxury possessions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(1), 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Veenstra, A., & Kuipers, G. (2013). It is not old-fashioned, it is vintage, vintage fashion and the complexities of 21st century consumption practices. Sociology Compass, 7(5), 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Westfield London. (2016). How we shop now trend report. Westfield [online]. Retrieved March 6, 2017, from https://uk.westfield.com/london/how-we-shop-now.
  37. WRAP. (2016). Measuring the active life of clothing. WRAP [online]. Retrieved January 12, 2018, from http://www.wrap.org.uk/sustainabletextiles/scap/extending-clothing-life/report/measuring-active-life-of-clothing.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amira Battle
    • 1
  • Daniella Ryding
    • 2
  • Claudia E. Henninger
    • 2
  1. 1.University of BathBathUK
  2. 2.School of MaterialsUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations