Skip to main content

Think Tanks and Emerging Power Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Think Tanks and Emerging Power Policy Networks

Abstract

Think tanks are research, analysis, and engagement institutions that generate policy advice on domestic and international issues, enabling policymakers to make informed decisions and bridging the gap between the government and the public at large. In simpler terms, think tanks serve as “go-to” institutions when experts on particular topics are needed to provide analysis or commentary on the breaking news of the day. These organizations are classified in one of the following categories: for profit, autonomous and independent, quasi-independent, university affiliated, political party affiliated, quasi-governmental, or governmental. These categories helpfully expand the definition of think tanks to overcome the presuppositions of a Western, Anglophone perspective—as think tanks become increasingly prominent around the world, so too does their definition necessarily expand beyond its original boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Joseph V. Montville defines Track Two diplomacy as “an unofficial, informal interaction between members of adversary groups or nations that aims to develop strategies, influence public opinion, and organize human and material resources in ways that might help resolve their conflict.” Joseph V. Montville, “The Arrow and the Olive Branch: A Case for Track Two Diplomacy,” in The Psychodynamics of International Relations. vol 2. eds. V. D. Volkan M.D., J. Montville, and D. A. Julius (Massachusetts: Lexington Books, 1991), 162.

  2. 2.

    The Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI) founded in 1831 in London, UK, is often credited as being the first modern think tank. For a history of the growth of think tanks in the United States see Thomas Medvetz, Think Tanks in America (The University of Chicago Press, 2012); David M. Ricci, The Transformation of American Politics: The New Washington and the Rise of Think Tanks (Yale University Press, 1993); Donald E. Abelson, A Capitol Idea: Think Tanks & US Foreign Policy (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006).

  3. 3.

    Lyndon B. Johnson, XXXVI President of the United States: 19631969, Remarks on the Occasion of the 50th Anniversary of the Brookings Institution (September 29, 1966) http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=27896, see also Andrew Rich, Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 1.

  4. 4.

    Andrew Selee, What Should Think Tanks Do? A Strategic Guide to Policy Impact (Stanford University Press, 2013), 4.

  5. 5.

    Sandy Gordon, India’s Rise as an Asian Power, Nation, Neighborhood, and Region (Georgetown University Press, 2014).

  6. 6.

    National Institution for Transforming India , Government of India , Overview, http://niti.gov.in/content/overview.

  7. 7.

    Xinhuanet, “Xi Calls for New Type of Think Tanks,” http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2014-10/27/c_133746282.htm, “Chinese President Xi Jinping called for a new type of think tank catered for China as the country looks to modernize its governance .”

References

  • Gordon, Sandy. 2014. India’s Rise as an Asian Power, Nation, Neighborhood, and Region. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Lyndon B. 1966. XXXVI President of the United States: 1963–1969, Remarks on the Occasion of the 50th Anniversary of the Brookings Institution, September 29. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=27896.

  • Montville, Joseph V. 1991. The Arrow and the Olive Branch: A Case for Track Two Diplomacy. In The Psychodynamics of International Relations, ed. V.D. Volkan, J. Montville, and D.A. Julius, vol. 2. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institution for Transforming India, Government of India, Overview, http://niti.gov.in/content/overview.

  • Rich, Andrew. 2004. Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selee, Andrew. 2013. What Should Think Tanks Do? A Strategic Guide to Policy Impact. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinhuanet. Xi Calls for New Type of Think Tanks. Chinese President Xi Jinping Called for a New Type of Think Tank Catered for China as the Country Looks to Modernize Its Governance. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2014-10/27/c_133746282.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McGann, J.G., Shull, A. (2018). Think Tanks and Emerging Power Networks. In: McGann, J. (eds) Think Tanks and Emerging Power Policy Networks. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71955-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics