Skip to main content

Introduction to Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Techniques

Abstract

Minimally invasive spine surgery started at the turn of the century and many predicted it would soon become the standard of care. Nonetheless, almost twenty years later, these techniques are used in less than 20% of the procedures performed in the United States. While certainly multifactorial, some of the reasons for this slow adoption include the difficult learning curve, as well as the initially increased operative time (and thus decreased surgical volume and revenue) for the seasoned “open” surgeon who tries to convert to the new minimally invasive techniques. The goal of this book is to share almost 20 years of experience in teaching (and sometimes learning) the minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques to those who understand the benefits and want to embrace a better option for their patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hicks GE, Morone N, Weiner DK. Degenerative lumbar disc and facet disease in older adults: prevalence and clinical correlates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:1301–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008;299:656–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gore M, Sadosky A, Stacey BR, Tai KS, Leslie D. The burden of chronic low back pain: clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37:E668–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:986–995.e1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Lynnger TM, Zuckerman SL, Morone PJ, Dewan MC, Vasquez-Castellanos RA, Cheng JS. Trends for spine surgery for the elderly: implications for access to healthcare in North America. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(Suppl 4):S136–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Devin CJ, Chotai S, Parker SL, Tetreault L, Fehlings MG, McGirt MJ. A cost-utility analysis of lumbar decompression with and without fusion for degenerative spine disease in the elderly. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(Suppl 4):S116–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhall SS, Wadhwa R, Wang MY, Tien-Smith A, Mummaneni PV. Traumatic thoracolumbar spinal injury: an algorithm for minimally invasive surgical management. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37:E9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mummaneni PV, Shaffrey CI, Lenke LG, Park P, Wang MY, La Marca F, et al. The minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery algorithm: a reproducible rational framework for decision making in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36:E6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hofstetter CP, Hofer AS, Wang MY. Economic impact of minimally invasive lumbar surgery. World J Orthop. 2015;6:190–201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lubelski D, Mihalovich KE, Skelly AC, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS, Mummaneni PV, et al. Is minimal access spine surgery more cost-effective than conventional spine surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:S65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Parker SL, Adogwa O, Davis BJ, Fulchiero E, Aaronson O, Cheng J, et al. Cost-utility analysis of minimally invasive versus open multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26:42–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahn J, Iqbal A, Manning BT, Leblang S, Bohl DD, Mayo BC, et al. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression-the surgical learning curve. Spine J. 2016;16:909–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Missios S, Bekelis K. Hospitalization cost after spine surgery in the United States of America. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:1632–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tender, G., Serban, D., DiGiorgio, A. (2018). Introduction to Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. In: Tender, G. (eds) Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Techniques. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71943-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71943-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71942-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71943-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics