Geostrophic Adjustment Beyond the Traditional Approximation

Chapter
Part of the Springer Oceanography book series (SPRINGEROCEAN)

Abstract

We examine geostrophic adjustment in a model rotating ocean when the angular speed of rotation \({\varvec{\Omega}}\) does not coincide in direction with the gravity; the traditional and hydrostatic approximations are not used. Two models are considered: the barotropic one and the stably-neutrally stratified (SNS) fluid consisting of a stratified upper layer and a homogeneous lower layer. Wave spectra in the models contain gyroscopic and (in the SNS fluid) internal waves. Linear adjustment results in a tendency of any localized initial state to a geostrophically balanced steady motion parallel to the layer boundaries. In the barotropic fluid and homogeneous layer in the SNS fluid the motion is columnar, the columns are parallel to \({\varvec{\Omega}}\); in the stratified layer the geostrophic mode is not columnar. Using the perturbation theory we study the non-linear adjustment for the small Rossby number and aspect ratio. During the adjustment an arbitrary perturbation is uniquely split into slow quasi-geostrophic (QG) and fast ageostrophic components. In the barotropic model the slow component is described by the 2D fluid dynamics equation for the geostrophic streamfunction. In the SNS fluid the component is governed by two coupled nonlinear equations of QG potential vorticity in the upper and lower layers. The ageostrophic part consists of the inertial oscillations modulated by amplitude depending on coordinates and the slow time, and (in the SNS fluid) internal waves. The internal waves decay due to dispersion and the residual flow is a sum of the QG slow component and inertial oscillations coupled to the QG flow.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 14-50-00095 (section “Barotropic Model”), the Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation grant no. 14.W03.31.0006 (section “Stably-Neutrally Stratified Fluid”), and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant no. 17-05-00094 (analysis of slow evolution).

References

  1. 1.
    Aref, H. (1984). Stirring by chaotic advection. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 143, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balmforth, N. J., Llewellyn Smith, S. G., & Young, W. R. (1998). Enhanced dispersion of near-inertial waves in an idealized geostrophic flow. Journal of Marine Research, 56, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balmforth, N. J., & Young, W. R. (1999). Radiative damping of near-inertial oscillations in the mixed layer. Journal of Marine Research, 57, 561–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brekhovskikh, L. M., & Goncharov, V. (1994). Mechanics of continua and wave dynamics. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davidson, P. A., Staplehurst, P. J., & Dalziel, S. B. (2006). On the evolution of eddies in a rapidly rotating system. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 557, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerkema, T., Zimmerman, J. T. F., Maas, L. R. M., & van Haren, H. (2008). Geophysical and astrophysical fluid dynamics beyond the traditional approximation. Reviews of Geophysics, 46, RG2004.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerkema, T., & Shrira, V. I. (2005). Near-inertial waves in the ocean: Beyond the traditional approximation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 529, 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenspan, H. P. (1968). Theory of rotating fluids. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Il’in, A. M. (1970). Asymptotic properties of a solution of a boundary-value problem. Mathematical Notes, 8, 625–632.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Il’in, A. M. (1972). On the behaviour of the solution of a boundary-value problem when t → ∞. Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik, 16, 545–572.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kamenkovich, V. M. (1977). Fundamentals of ocean dynamics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kamenkovich, V. M., & Kamenkovich, I. V. (1993). On the evolution of Rossby waves, generated by wind stress in a closed basin, incorporating total mass conservation. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 18, 67–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kasahara, A. (2003). The roles of the horizontal component of the Earth’s angular velocity in nonhydrostatic linear models. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 60, 1085–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klein, P., & Llewellyn-Smith, S. (2001). Horizontal dispersion of near-inertial oscillations in a turbulent mesoscale eddy field. Journal of Marine Research, 59, 697–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klein, P., Llewellyn-Smith, S., & Lapeyre, G. (2004). Organization of near-inertial energy by an eddy field. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 130, 1153–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kochin, N. E., Kibel, L. A., & Rose, N. V. (1964). Theoretical hydromechanics. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kunze, E. (1985). Near-inertial wave propagation in geostrophic shear. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 15, 544–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    LeBlond, P. H., & Mysak, L. A. (1978). Waves in the ocean. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miropol’sky, Y. Z. (2001). Dynamics of internal gravity waves in the ocean. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reznik, G. M. (2013). Linear dynamics of a stably-neutrally stratified ocean. Journal of Marine Research, 71, 253–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reznik, G. M. (2014). Geostrophic adjustment with gyroscopic waves: Barotropic fluid without traditional approximation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 743, 585–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reznik, G. M. (2014). Geostrophic adjustment with gyroscopic waves: stably-neutrally stratified fluid without the traditional approximation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 747, 605–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reznik, G. M. (2015). Wave adjustment: general concept and examples. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 779, 514–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reznik, G. M., Zeitlin, V., & Ben Jelloul, M. (2001). Nonlinear theory of geostrophic adjustment. Part 1 rotating shallow-water model. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 445, 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Staplehurst, P. J., Davidson, P. A., & Dalziel, S. B. (2008). Structure formation in homogeneous freely decaying turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 598, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Timmermans, M. L., Melling, H., & Rainville, L. (2007). Dynamics in the Deep Canada Basin, Arctic Ocean, inferred by thermistor chain time series. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 37, 1066–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Haren, H., & Millot, C. (2005). Gyroscopic waves in the Mediterranean Sea. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L24614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Young, W. R., & Ben Jelloul, M. (1997). Propagation of near-inertial oscillations through a geostrophic flow. Journal of Marine Research, 55, 735–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zeitlin, V., Reznik, G. M., & Ben Jelloul, M. (2003). Nonlinear theory of geostrophic adjustment. Part 2. Two-layer and continuously stratified primitive equations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 491, 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations