Skip to main content

On Strong Equilibria and Improvement Dynamics in Network Creation Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10660))

Abstract

We study strong equilibria in network creation games. These form a classical and well-studied class of games where a set of players form a network by buying edges to their neighbors at a cost of a fixed parameter \(\alpha \). The cost of a player is defined to be the cost of the bought edges plus the sum of distances to all the players in the resulting graph. We identify and characterize various structural properties of strong equilibria, which lead to a characterization of the set of strong equilibria for all \(\alpha \) in the range (0, 2). For \(\alpha > 2\), Andelman et al. [4] prove that a star graph in which every leaf buys one edge to the center node is a strong equilibrium, and conjecture that in fact any star is a strong equilibrium. We resolve this conjecture in the affirmative. Additionally, we show that when \(\alpha \) is large enough (\(\ge 2n\)) there exist non-star trees that are strong equilibria. For the strong price of anarchy, we provide precise expressions when \(\alpha \) is in the range (0, 2), and we prove a lower bound of 3/2 when \(\alpha \ge 2\). Lastly, we aim to characterize under which conditions (coalitional) improvement dynamics may converge to a strong equilibrium. To this end, we study the (coalitional) finite improvement property and (coalitional) weak acyclicity property. We prove various conditions under which these properties do and do not hold. Some of these results also hold for the class of pure Nash equilibria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Except for \(\alpha \in (1,2)\) and \(n \ge 5\), in which case we know that strong equilibria do not exist.

  2. 2.

    An exception to this is that we can prove that the coalitional finite improvement property is satisfied for the very special case that \(\alpha > 1\) and \(n = 3\).

References

  1. Albers, S., Eilts, S., Even-Dar, E., Mansour, Y., Roditty, L.: On Nash equilibria for a network creation game. In: Proceedings of the 17th Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 89–98. SIAM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alon, N., Demaine, E.D., Hajiaghayi, M.T., Leighton, T.: Basic network creation games. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 27(2), 656–668 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Àlvarez, A., Messegué, A.: Selfish network creation with non-uniform edge cost (2017). arXiv: 1706.09132

  4. Andelman, N., Feldman, M., Mansour, Y.: Strong price of anarchy. Games Econ. Behav. 65(2), 289–317 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Aumann, R.J.: Acceptable points in general cooperative N-person games. In: Luce, R.D., Tucker, A.W. (eds) Contribution to the Theory of Games, vol. IV (Annals of Mathematical Study 40), pp. 287–324. Princeton University Press (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bala, V., Goyal, S.: A noncooperative model of network formation. Econometrica 68(5), 1181–1229 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bala, V., Goyal, S.: A strategic analysis of network reliability. Rev. Econ. Des. 5(3), 205–228 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Billand, P., Bravard, C., Sarangi, S.: Existence of Nash networks in one-way flow models. Econ. Theor. 37(3), 491–507 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Brandes, U., Hoefer, M., Nick, B.: Network creation games with disconnected equilibria. In: Papadimitriou, C., Zhang, S. (eds.) WINE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5385, pp. 394–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92185-1_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Chauhan, A., Lenzner, P., Melnichenko, A., Molitor, L.: Selfish network creation with non-uniform edge cost (2017). arXiv:1706.10200

  11. Corbo, J., Parkes, D.C.: The price of selfish behavior in bilateral network formation. In: Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp. 99–107. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Demaine, E.D., Hajiaghayi, M., Mahini, H., Zadimoghaddam, M.: The price of anarchy in network creation games. ACM Trans. Algorithms 8(2), 13:1–13:3 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Derks, J., Kuipers, J., Tennekes, M., Thuijsman, F.: Local dynamics in network formation. Technical report, Maastricht University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Derks, J., Kuipers, J., Tennekes, M., Thuijsman, F.: Existence of Nash networks in the one-way flow model of network formation. Model. Comput. Optim. 6, 9 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Fabrikant, A., Luthra, A., Maneva, E., Papadimitriou, C.H., Shenker, S.: On a network creation game. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pp. 347–351. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Galeotti, A.: One-way flow networks: the role of heterogeneity. Econ. Theor. 29(1), 163–179 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Haller, H., Kamphorst, J., Sarangi, S.: (non-)existence and scope of Nash networks. Econ. Theor. 31(3), 597–604 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Haller, H., Sarangi, S.: Nash networks with heterogeneous links. Math. Soc.Sci. 50(2), 181–201 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawald, B., Lenzner, P.: On dynamics in selfish network creation. In: Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA), pp. 83–92. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.: Worst-case equilibria. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49116-3_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Worst-case equilibria. Comput. Sci. Rev. 3(2), 65–69 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lenzner, P.: On dynamics in basic network creation games. In: Persiano, G. (ed.) SAGT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6982, pp. 254–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24829-0_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Lenzner, P.: Greedy selfish network creation. In: Goldberg, P.W. (ed.) WINE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7695, pp. 142–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35311-6_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Mamageishvili, A., Mihalák, M., Müller, D.: Tree Nash equilibria in the network creation game. Internet Math. 11(4–5), 472–486 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Messegué, B.: The price of anarchy in network creation. Master’s thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mihalák, M., Schlegel, J.C.: Asymmetric swap-equilibrium: a unifying equilibrium concept for network creation games. In: Rovan, B., Sassone, V., Widmayer, P. (eds.) MFCS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7464, pp. 693–704. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32589-2_60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Mihalák, M., Schlegel, J.C.: The price of anarchy in network creation games is (mostly) constant. Theor. Comput. Syst. (TOCS) 53(1), 53–72 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author was partially supported by the NCN grant 2014/13/B/ST6/01807 and the second author by the NWO grant 612.001.352. We thank Krzysztof R. Apt for many useful suggestions concerning the results and organization of this paper. We thank Mateusz Skomra for many helpful discussions and feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart de Keijzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Janus, T., de Keijzer, B. (2017). On Strong Equilibria and Improvement Dynamics in Network Creation Games. In: R. Devanur, N., Lu, P. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10660. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71924-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71924-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71923-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71924-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics