Skip to main content

Crossing the Threshold: Geoffrey Chaucer, Adam Smith, and the Liminal Transactionalism of the Later Middle Ages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Money, Commerce, and Economics in Late Medieval English Literature

Part of the book series: The New Middle Ages ((TNMA))

  • 295 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers the economic elements of Chaucer’s thought as revealed through his poetry in relation to the medievalism inherent in the foundational economic writings of Adam Smith. The chapter advances the notion of “liminal transactionalism” to describe an economic outlook and set of practices merging gift-exchange with commerce, a mode of thinking and practice that obtained from the later Middle Ages well into the early Modern period, and in which Chaucer’s and Smith’s thought, while significantly distinct, can both be located. To explore their different positions on this spectrum, the chapter addresses first the satirical dimensions of Smith’s view of the decline of “feudalism.” It then analyzes how the elements that Smith picks out in that decline—especially the over-emphasis on personal prestige by lords, and the growth of more independent practical strategies by those who served them—featured in late medieval English poetry, especially Chaucer’s. Finally, the chapter argues that the Smithian elements of Chaucer’s thought do not fully amount to a Smithian “classical” economic model, but that Smith himself retains elements of a Chaucerian or late-medieval combination of ways of defining economic value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the first, see the important revision of Marxist and Smithian accounts of the fourteenth-century’s collapse of population, traditional trade routes, and focus and kind of imposed industrial improvements in Campbell (2016); for the second, see the more detailed study of specific versus broader economic changes in Dyer (2005). A stimulating inquiry into the limits and uses of various models and theories for accounting for why “the distinctive features of what is often termed the ‘feudal era’ evolve[d] and dissolve[d] when they did” is found in Hatcher and Bailey (2001).

  2. 2.

    All citations from Smith (1976) will be in this form (including book and chapter for other editions).

  3. 3.

    Simpson treats Renaissance figuring of the “middle ages” through John Leland and John Bale (2002, 7–32). On the notion of “mode,” which I invoke here as well, see Simpson’s rather defensive and negative remark from a quotation by Alastair Fowler: “modes have always an incomplete repertoire, a selection only of the corresponding kind’s features, and one from which overall external structure is absent” (67 n.80). In my usage here, I would more positively define “mode” as a recurrent and deeply habituated combination of values and institutionally enshrined practices.

  4. 4.

    For the long tradition of making Chaucer the exceptional forerunner, see Simpson (2002, 45–50), with other references.

  5. 5.

    The last point is Howell’s (2010, 261–302) not Dyer’s .

  6. 6.

    For discussion of the late medieval and early modern ethics noted here, see the discussion of debt and credit in Bertolet (2013, 80–104), and for later incarnations, Muldrew (1998). See also the discussion of debt and interest in Galloway (2011).

  7. 7.

    For some discussions of this focus in medieval literature, see Wadiak (2016), Putter (2000), and Galloway (2006). See also Galloway (1994). For academic medieval economic theory and its importance to intellectual history generally, an excellent introduction is Langholm (1998).

  8. 8.

    From Harbert (1975, 12–13).

  9. 9.

    All citations of Gower (1900) are from this edition.

  10. 10.

    See Bertolet (2013), Galloway (2011).

  11. 11.

    See Parker (1999), Galloway (2011, 98–99).

  12. 12.

    Citations are from Chaucer (1987).

  13. 13.

    For comment on the importance of particularity in gift -exchange, versus the “denial of individuality” in market transactions, see Howell (2010, 180–1, 201).

  14. 14.

    See Broughton (2005, 583–648), with a convenient chart of features of the different branches of the story (587–89).

Works Cited

  • Bell, Adrian R., Chris Brooks, and Paul R. Dryburgh. 2007. The English Wool Market, c. 1230–1327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolet, Craig E. 2013. Chaucer, Gower, Hoccleve and the Commercial Practices of Late Fourteenth-Century London. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britnell, Richard H. 1996. The Commercialisation of English Society, 1000–1500. 2nd ed. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, Laurel. 2005. “The Prioress’s Prologue and Tale.” In Sources and Analogues of the Canterbury Tales II. Ed. Robert M. Correale and Mary Hamel. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 583–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Bruce M. S. 2016. The Great Transition: Climate, Disease and Society in the Late-Medieval World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chaucer, Geoffrey. 1987. The Riverside Chaucer. Ed. Larry D. Benson, 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton and Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Christopher. 2005. An Age of Transition? Economy and Society in England in the Later Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, Andrew. 1994. “The Making of a Social Ethic in Late Medieval England: From Gratitudo to ‘Kyndenesse.’” Journal of the History of Ideas 55: 365–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, Andrew. 2006. “Layamon’s Gift.” PMLA 121: 717–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, Andrew. 2011. “The Account Book and the Treasure: Gilbert Maghfeld’s Textual Economy and the Poetics of Mercantile Accounting in Ricardian Literature.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 33: 65–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower, John. 1900. The English Works of John Gower. Ed. G. C. Macaulay, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, Stephen. 1980. Renaissance Self-Fashioning from More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbert, Bruce, ed. 1975. A Thirteenth-Century Anthology of Rhetorical Poems. Toronto Medieval Latin Texts. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, John, and Mark Bailey. 2001. Modelling the Middle Ages: The History and Theory of England’s Economic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Martha C. 2010. Commerce Before Capitalism in Europe, 1300–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, Elliot. 2008. Lordship and Literature: John Gower and the Politics of the Great Household. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langholm, Odd. 1998. The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought: Antecedents of Choice and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maidstone, Richard. 2003. Richard Maidstone: Concordia (The Reconciliation of Richard II with London). Ed. David R. Carlson and trans. A. G. Rigg. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Texts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1990. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Trans. Ben Fowkes, 2 vols. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muldrew, Craig. 1998. The Economy of Obligation: The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ovid. 1979. Ovid: The Art of Love and Other Poems. Ed. and trans. J. H. Mozley. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. H. 1999. “Accounting in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales.” Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 12: 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putter, Ad. 2000. “Gifts and Commodities in Sir Amadace.” Review of English Studies 51: 371–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, James. 2002. Reform and Cultural Revolution. The Oxford English Literary History, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Ed. Edwin Cannan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadiak, Walter. 2016. Savage Economy: The Returns of Middle English Romance. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Galloway, A. (2018). Crossing the Threshold: Geoffrey Chaucer, Adam Smith, and the Liminal Transactionalism of the Later Middle Ages. In: Bertolet, C., Epstein, R. (eds) Money, Commerce, and Economics in Late Medieval English Literature. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71900-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics