Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 945))

  • 1128 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we look at some simple models to illustrate how a phase transition from hadronic matter to a quark-gluon plasma can occur. First we determine when hadrons start forming clusters which can be considered as quark matter. After considering the thermodynamics of an ideal hadron gas and of an ideal quark-gluon medium, we introduce bag pressure and baryon repulsion as interaction features to specify under which conditions strongly interacting matter prefers to consist of hadrons and when it wants to turn into a plasma of unbound quarks and gluons. Finally we show that also a simple string model yields localized hadrons at low density, while at high density color charges can move around freely by changing partners. In all cases, very basic physical notions are found to lead to a two-phase structure of matter.

The time has come, the walrus said, to talk of many things: of shoes, and ships, and sealing wax, of cabbages, and kings, and why the sea is boiling hot, and whether pigs have wings. Lewis Carrol, Through the Looking Glass

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is a priori not impossible that quark matter might indeed be the thermodynamically stable form, making our present universe just a metastable bubble in the true vacuum. The production of even a drop of quark matter could then trigger the transition to the stable ground state. This would make the attempt to create quark matter by nuclear collisions a most risky enterprise: we would not be around to see the successful outcome. Fortunately, rate estimates of nucleus-nucleus collisions based on cosmic ray studies indicate [4] that such collisions must have taken place sporadically in the history of the universe, apparently without having disturbed the vacuum.

References

  1. T. Celik, F. Karsch, H. Satz, Phys. Lett. B 97, 128 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. See e.g., M.S. Isichenko, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 961 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Cleymans, R.V. Gavai, E. Suhonen, Phys. Rep. 130, 217 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Hut, Nucl. Phys. A 418, 301c (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. T.D. Lee, in Statistical Mechanics of Quarks and Hadrons, ed. by H. Satz (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Chodos, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C.B. Thorn, V.F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3471 (1974)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Johnson, in Statistical Mechanics of Quarks and Hadrons, ed. by H. Satz (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Baacke, Acta Phys. Polonica B 8, 625 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.C. Collins, M.J. Perry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1353 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. B.A. Freedman, L.D. McLerran, Phys. Rev. 16, 1169 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Cleymans, K. Redlich, H. Satz, E. Suhonen, Z. Phys. C 33, 151 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.Y. Onoda, E.G. Liniger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 2727 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Rischke et al., Z. Phys. C 51, 485 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, J. Kogut, K.D. Lane, T.-M. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 369 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Miyazawa, Phys. Rev. D 20, 2953 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Goloviznin, H. Satz, Yad. Fiz. 60, 523 (1997) [Phys. Atom. Nucl. 60, 449 (1997)]

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, e.g., K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. See, e.g., I.S. Gradshteyn, I.M. Ryzhik, Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic, New York/London, 1965)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix: Bose and Fermi Gas Partition Functions

Appendix: Bose and Fermi Gas Partition Functions

The partition function for an ideal gas of particles of mass m at temperature T in a volume V is given by [17]

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \ln Z_s(T,V) = -s {V \over 2\pi^2} \int_0^{\infty} dp~p^2~ \ln\left[1 - s \exp (-\sqrt{p^2 + m^2}/T)\right], {} \end{aligned} $$
(4.62)

with s = +1 for bosons, s = −1 for fermions. For simplicity we assume in both cases no internal degrees of freedom. Expanding the logarithm as a power series, we obtain

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \ln Z_s(T,V) = s{V \over 2\pi^2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {1\over n} \int_0^{\infty} dp~p^2 \left(s~\exp(-\sqrt{p^2 + m^2}/T) \right)^n; {} \end{aligned} $$
(4.63)

the first term in this sum constitutes the Boltzmann limit. The momentum integration can be carried out to give

(4.64)

where K 2(x) is the modified Hankel function of second order. In the limit x → 0, it becomes

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} K_2(x) = {2 \over x^2} \left[ 1 + {x^2 \over 4} + \mathrm{O}(x^4)\right]. {} \end{aligned} $$
(4.65)

Inserting this into Eq. (4.64), we get

(4.66)

The sums in Eq. (4.66) are Riemann zeta functions [18]:

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \zeta(r) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {1 \over n^r} {} \end{aligned} $$
(4.67)

and

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} (1-2^{(1-r)}) \zeta(r) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {(-1)^{n+1} \over n^r} {} \end{aligned} $$
(4.68)

In particular, we have

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {1 \over n^4} = \zeta(4) = {\pi^4 \over 90}, \end{aligned} $$
(4.69)
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {(-1)^{n+1} \over n^4} = (1-2^{-3})\zeta(4) = {7 \over 8}~ {\pi^4 \over 90}, \end{aligned} $$
(4.70)
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {1 \over n^2} = \zeta(2) = {\pi^2 \over 6}, \end{aligned} $$
(4.71)
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {(-1)^{n+1} \over n^2} = (1-2^{-1})\zeta(2) = {1 \over 2}~ {\pi^2 \over 6}. \end{aligned} $$
(4.72)

Inserting this into Eq. (4.66) gives as leading terms

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \ln Z_B(T,V) = {\pi^2 \over 90} V T^3\left[ 1 - {15 \over 4 \pi^2} \left({m\over T}\right)^2 + \mathrm{O}((m/T)^4)\right] {} \end{aligned} $$
(4.73)

for the partition function for bosons and

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \ln Z_F(T,V) ={7\over 8} {\pi^2 \over 90} V T^3\left[ 1 - {30 \over 7 \pi^2} \left({m\over T}\right)^2 + \mathrm{O}((m/T)^4)\right]. {} \end{aligned} $$
(4.74)

for fermions. In both cases, the first term is the Stefan-Boltzmann limit. Comparing Eqs. (4.66) with (4.73), we see that the numerical coefficient of the bosonic partition function in the limit m → 0 is π 2/90 ≃ 0.1097 for correct Bose-Einstein statistics, while it becomes 1/π 2 ≃ 0.1013 in the Stefan-Boltzmann limit. This provides the justification for using the latter form whenever m ≪ T.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Satz, H. (2018). From Hadrons to Quarks. In: Extreme States of Matter in Strong Interaction Physics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 945. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71894-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics