Skip to main content

The Brain Sciences Against the Welfare State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Psychoanalyzing the Politics of the New Brain Sciences

Abstract

In order to explore how neoliberal ideology shapes theories and practices of the new brain sciences, this chapter closely reads a study that integrates neuroscience, evolutionary psychology, and behavioral economics. One of the goals of this analysis is to understand the basic underlying theory that connects the different neuroliberal discourses, and although many individual scientists might reject my characterization of their fields, I will argue that their work is only possible because of the belief in the idea of discoverable biological determinism. In short, neuroscientists, evolutionary psychologists, and behavioral economists must accept the rejection of the psychoanalytic unconscious in order to promote a theory of non-conscious thinking that is derived from mental programs determined by evolutionary forces. Moreover, this mode of new social Darwinism is reliant on the idea that inherited mental traits can be connected to specific brain regions, neurons, and genes, and even when there is a recognition of the roles played by culture, learning, experience, and subjectivity, the need to articulate a universal form of human nature overrides all other sources that could shape thinking and behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Harding, Sandra. “After the Neutrality Ideal: Science, Politics, and “Strong Objectivity”.” Social research (1992): 567–587.

  2. 2.

    Petersen, Michael Bang, et al. “Who deserves help? evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about welfare.” Political psychology 33.3 (2012): 395.

  3. 3.

    Haidt, Jonathan. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage, 2012.

  4. 4.

    Peterson et al., 395.

  5. 5.

    Hancock, Ange-Marie. The politics of disgust: The public identity of the welfare queen. NYU Press, 2004.

  6. 6.

    Peterson et al., 395–6.

  7. 7.

    Ibid., 396.

  8. 8.

    Coughlin, Richard M. Ideology, public opinion, & welfare policy: attitudes toward taxes and spending in industrialized societies. No. 42. Univ of California Intl &, 1980.

  9. 9.

    Shepherdson, Charles. Vital signs: Nature, culture, psychoanalysis. Psychology Press, 2000.

  10. 10.

    Freud, Sigmund, and James Strachey. Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Vol. 5008. Basic Books, 1975.

  11. 11.

    Lacan, Jacques . “The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience.” Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. A Reader (1949): 287–292.

  12. 12.

    Peterson et al., 396.

  13. 13.

    Longobardi, Giuseppe, and Ian Roberts. “Universals, diversity and change in the science of language: Reaction to “The Myth of Language Universals and Cognitive Science”.” Lingua 120.12 (2010): 2699–2703.

  14. 14.

    Peterson et al., 396.

  15. 15.

    Sampson, Edward E. “Cognitive psychology as ideology.” American psychologist 36.7 (1981): 730.

  16. 16.

    Rose, Steven. “Alas, poor Darwin.” Biologist (London, England) 48.2 (2001): 100.

  17. 17.

    Peterson et al., 396.

  18. 18.

    Ibid, 397.

  19. 19.

    Ketelaar, Timothy, and Bruce J. Ellis. “Are evolutionary explanations unfalsifiable? Evolutionary psychology and the Lakatosian philosophy of science.” Psychological Inquiry 11.1 (2000): 1–21.

  20. 20.

    Holcomb III, Harmon R. “Just so stories and inference to the best explanation in evolutionary psychology .” Minds and Machines 6.4 (1996): 525–540.

  21. 21.

    Peterson et al., 397.

  22. 22.

    Kashtan, Nadav, Elad Noor, and Uri Alon. “Varying environments can speed up evolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104.34 (2007): 13711–13716.

  23. 23.

    Peterson et al., 397.

  24. 24.

    Ibid.

  25. 25.

    Rose, Hilary, and Steven Rose. Genes, cells and brains: The promethean promises of the new biology. Verso Books, 2013.

  26. 26.

    Ibid., 397–8.

  27. 27.

    Freud, Sigmund, Marie Ed Bonaparte, Anna Ed Freud, Ernst Ed Kris, Eric Trans Mosbacher, and James Trans Strachey. “Project for a scientific psychology.” (1954).

  28. 28.

    Freud, Sigmund. The interpretation of dreams. Read Books Ltd, 2013.

  29. 29.

    Lacan, Jacques . The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954–1955 . Vol. 2. WW Norton & Company, 1991.

  30. 30.

    Lacan, Jacques . “The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis , trans. Alan Sheridan.” New York: Norton 67 (1978): 73–77.

  31. 31.

    Freud, Sigmund. “Instincts and their vicissitudes.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIV (1914–1916): On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement, Papers on Metapsychology and Other Works. 1957. 109–140.

  32. 32.

    Freud, Sigmund. “The economic problem of masochism .” The Psychoanalytic Review (1913–1957) 16 (1929): 209.

  33. 33.

    Peterson et al., 398.

  34. 34.

    Panksepp, Jaak, et al. “Comparative approaches in evolutionary psychology : Molecular neuroscience meets the mind.” Neuroendocrinology Letters 23.Suppl 4 (2002): 105–115.

  35. 35.

    Peters, Brad M. “Evolutionary psychology : neglecting neurobiology in defining the mind.” Theory & Psychology 23.3 (2013): 305–322.

  36. 36.

    Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. “Sewing up the mind: the claims of evolutionary psychology.” Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (2000): 129–143.

  37. 37.

    Peterson et al., 398.

  38. 38.

    Meyer, John W., and Ronald L. Jepperson. “The ‘actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency.” Sociological theory 18.1 (2000): 100–120.

  39. 39.

    Peterson et al., 399.

  40. 40.

    Byrne, Richard, and Andrew Whiten. “Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans (oxford science publications).” (1989).

  41. 41.

    Peterson et al., 398.

  42. 42.

    Rose, Hilary, and Steven Rose. Genes, cells and brains: The promethean promises of the new biology. Verso Books, 2013.

  43. 43.

    Peterson et al., 399.

  44. 44.

    Ingold, Tim. “The optimal forager and economic man.” Nature and society: Anthropological perspectives (1996): 25–44.

  45. 45.

    Peterson et al., 399.

  46. 46.

    Ibid.

  47. 47.

    Green, Donald P., Ian Shapiro, and Ian Shapiro. Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.

  48. 48.

    Peterson et al., 399–400.

  49. 49.

    Martin, Isaac William. The permanent tax revolt: How the property tax transformed American politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.

  50. 50.

    Peterson et al., 400.

  51. 51.

    Ibid.

  52. 52.

    Confer, Jaime C., et al. “Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations.” American Psychologist 65.2 (2010): 110.

  53. 53.

    Peterson et al., 400.

  54. 54.

    Hickok, Gregory. The myth of mirror neurons: The real neuroscience of communication and cognition. WW Norton & Company, 2014.

  55. 55.

    Rawls, John. “Distributive justice.” Perspectives In Bus Ethics Sie 3E (1967): 48.

  56. 56.

    Peterson et al., 400.

  57. 57.

    Ibid., 401.

  58. 58.

    Vedantam, Shankar. The hidden brain: How our unconscious minds elect presidents, control markets, wage wars, and save our lives. Random House Digital, Inc., 2010.

  59. 59.

    Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan, 2011.

  60. 60.

    Peterson et al., 402.

  61. 61.

    Innocenti, Giorno Maria. “Neuroscience, brains, and computers.” Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica 67.254 (2011): 609–615.

  62. 62.

    Jimenez, Guillermo C. Red Genes, Blue Genes: Exposing Political Irrationality. Autonomedia, 2009.

  63. 63.

    Peterson et al., 402.

  64. 64.

    McCluskey, Martha T. “Efficiency and social citizenship: challenging the neoliberal attack on the welfare state.” Indiana Law Journal 78 (2003).

  65. 65.

    Peterson et al., 402.

  66. 66.

    Hill, Steven. Europe’s Promise: Why the European way is the best hope in an insecure age. Univ of California Press, 2010.

  67. 67.

    Peterson et al., 404.

  68. 68.

    Fraser, Nancy. “Clintonism, welfare, and the antisocial wage: the emergence of a neoliberal political imaginary.” Rethinking Marxism 6.1 (1993): 9–23.

  69. 69.

    Peterson et al., 405–6.

  70. 70.

    Ibid., 406.

  71. 71.

    Truell, Allen D., James E. Bartlett, and Melody W. Alexander. “Response rate, speed, and completeness: A comparison of Internet-based and mail surveys.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34.1 (2002): 46–49.

  72. 72.

    Peterson et al., 406.

  73. 73.

    Ibid.

  74. 74.

    Freud, Sigmund. “Some additional notes on dream-interpretation as a whole.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIX (1923–1925): The Ego and the Id and Other Works. 1961. 123–138.

  75. 75.

    Peterson et al., 413.

  76. 76.

    Ibid.

  77. 77.

    Ibid.

  78. 78.

    Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Random House, 2010.

  79. 79.

    Peterson et al., 414.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Samuels, R. (2017). The Brain Sciences Against the Welfare State. In: Psychoanalyzing the Politics of the New Brain Sciences. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71891-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics