The Influence of Business Ecosystems on Innovation-Based Industries: A Research on the Mechanical Sector in Italy

  • Anatolie Caraganciu
  • Fabio Musso
  • Barbara Francioni
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The business ecosystem perspective can be considered as a more advanced point of view for interpreting the development of local economic systems, if compared to more traditional concepts such as clusters, industrial districts, local or regional systems, and local networks. The business ecosystem perspective allows to better highlight the adaptive and evolutionary nature of local systems in front of the changing external environment and dynamics on national and international markets. The aim of the research was to analyze the key characteristics of firms belonging to a local business ecosystem specialized on an innovation-driven industry – the mechanical sector – in order to verify which kind of influence the local context still exerts on firms’ management, competitiveness, and relationships. A quantitative survey has been conducted on a sample of 104 firms located in Italy, focusing on organization, strategies, and relationships with both the internal (at the local system level) and external networks, and to relationships with the local environment and market. Results highlight the ability of firms belonging to a business ecosystem to take advantage of innovation diffusion processes and also to better develop the quality of products. An important issue that emerges is related to the cohesion of ties within the local context. When relationships are based on knowledge exchange, the evolution of smaller and weaker firms can be fostered, bringing to a general strengthening of the local system.

Keywords

Business ecosystems Local economic systems Clusters Industrial districts Mechanical industry 

References

  1. Adner, R.: Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harv. Bus. Rev. 84(4), 98–107 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. Becattini, G.: The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In: Pyke, F., Becattini, G., Sengenberger, W. (eds.) Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Cooperation in Italy, pp. 37–51. International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva (1990)Google Scholar
  3. Becattini, G., Rullani, E.: Local systems and global connections: the role of knowledge. In: Cossentino, F., Pyke, F., Sengenberger, W. (eds.) Local and Regional Response to Global Pressure: The Case of Italy and its Industrial Districts. International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva (1996)Google Scholar
  4. Boschma, R.A., Lambooy, J.G., Schutjens, V.: Embeddedness and innovation. In: Taylor, M., Leonard, S. (eds.) Embedded Enterprise and Social Capital: International Perspectives, pp. 19–35. Ashgate, Aldershot (2002)Google Scholar
  5. Brown, K.A., Burgess, J.D., Festing, M., Royer, S., Steffen, C., Waterhouse, J.M.: Towards a new conceptualisation of clusters. In: Chapman, R. (ed.) Proceedings Managing Our Intellectual and Social Capital: 21st ANZAM 2007 Conference, pp. 1–13, Sydney (2007)Google Scholar
  6. Camagni, R.P. (ed.): Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspective. Belhaven, London (1991)Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, G.R., Hannan, M.T.: The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2000)Google Scholar
  8. Eisenhardt, K.M., Galunic, D.C.: Coevolving: at last, a way to make synergies. Harv. Bus. Rev. 78, 91–101 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. El-Ansary, A.I., Stern, L.W.: Power measurement in the distribution channel. J. Mark. Res. 9(1), 47–52 (1972)Google Scholar
  10. Francioni, B., Musso, F., Cioppi, M.: Decision-maker characteristics and international decisions for SMEs. Manag. Decis. 53(10), 2226–2249 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grandori, A., Soda, G.: Inter-firm networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organ. Stud. 16(2), 183–214 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J.: Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1989)Google Scholar
  13. Humphrey, J., Schmitz, H.: How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Reg. Stud. 36(9), 1017–1027 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: Strategy as ecology. Harv. Bus. Rev. 82(3), 68–78 (2004a)Google Scholar
  15. Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy. Innovation, and Sustainability. Harvard Business School Press Books, Boston (2004b)Google Scholar
  16. Koenig, G.: Business ecosystems revisited. Management (France). 15(2), 208–224 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. Lewin, A.Y., Long, C.P., Carroll, T.N.: The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 10(5), 535–550 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malhotra, N., Birks D.: Marketing research: An integrated approach. Prentice Hall, Harlow (2007)Google Scholar
  19. Maskell, P.: Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. In: Breschi, S. (ed.) Clusters, Networks, and Innovation, pp. 411–432. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  20. Moore, J.F.: Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. The Antitrust Bulletin. 51(1), 31–75 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nordhaug, K.: Globalisation, Embeddedness and Disembeddedness Working Paper No. 1. Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo, Oslo (2003)Google Scholar
  22. Peltoniemi, M.: Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems. Emerg. Comp. Org. 8(1), 10–19 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. Pierce, L.: Big losses in ecosystem niches: how core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strateg. Manag. J. 30, 323–347 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Porter, M. E.: The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard business review. 68(2), 73–93 (1990)Google Scholar
  25. Tee, R., Gawer, A.: Industry architecture as a determinant of successful platform strategies: a case study of the i-mode mobile internet service. Eur. Manag. Rev. 6(4), 217–232 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Uzzi, B.: Social structure and competition in interfirm networks : the paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q. 42(1), 35–67 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van der Borgh, M., Cloodt, M., Romme, A.G.L.: Value creation by knowledge-based ecosystems: evidence from a field study. R&D Manag. 42(2), 150–169 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Whitford, J.: The decline of a model? Challenge and response in the Italian industrial districts. Econ. Soc. 30(1), 38–65 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zucchella, A.: Local cluster dynamics: trajectories of mature industrial districts between decline and multiple embeddedness. J. Inst. Econ. 2(2006), 21–44 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anatolie Caraganciu
    • 1
  • Fabio Musso
    • 2
  • Barbara Francioni
    • 2
  1. 1.Lucian Blaga University of SibiuSibiuRomania
  2. 2.Carlo Bo University of UrbinoUrbinoItaly

Personalised recommendations