Strategic Analysis and Evaluation of a Research University’s Performance

  • Oksana Zhylinska
  • Maksim Sitnitskiy
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


The article analyzes and compares the main rating systems of research universities’ performance at the world level. It also suggests a system of relevant criteria designed to conduct strategic analysis and evaluation of a research university’s performance. The criteria allow objectivizing the results of the evaluation while minimizing the level of a subjective component within a set of consolidated results.


Research university Activity evaluation Evaluation criteria Strategic analysis Assessment rankings Evaluation methodology 


  1. Antonyuk, L., Satsyk, V.: Tendencje i perspektywy jakościowego wzrostu gospodarczego Ukrainy, Konwergencja modeli ekonomicznych. Polska i Ukraina, Część 3.4, pp. 394–409. Fundacja Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, Kraków (2009)Google Scholar
  2. Babansky, M.: Classical universities: modernity and prospects. Univ. Manag. Pract. Anal. 2(13), 20–21 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. Balatsky, E., Yekymova, N.: Global university ratings: the problem of manipulation. J. New Econ. Assoc. 1(13), 126–148 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2017). Accessed 18 June 2017
  5. Gorelov, B., Karmazinskii, A., Klygina, I.: Technique for rating assessment of a technical university. Scientific session, vol.6 Actual problems of humanities. Problems of university education. Economics and Management, pp. 118–120. MEPHI (2002)Google Scholar
  6. Ilnytskyi, D.: Universities in the global knowledge economy: an eclectic paradigm. Int. Econ. Policy. 1(22), 123–155 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. Kalenyuk, I.: The development of European integration in educational sphere. Shared European environment: harmonization of megaregional contradictions [Monograph]. In: Lukyanenko, D., Chuzhikova, V., 456–464. KNEU, Кyiv (2007)Google Scholar
  8. Kalenyuk, I.: Educational imperative to ensure competitiveness of national economy. Compet. Monit. 1-2, 74–76 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. Kurbatov, S.: University rankings as education indicators. Philosophy of Education: Scientific Journal “Chasopys”, No. 1–2 (7). Institute of Higher Education of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, National Pedagogical University named after M.P. Drahomanov, Ukranian Academy of Political Sciences, 309–317. Publishing House of the NPU named after M.P. Drahomanov, Kyiv (2008)Google Scholar
  10. Kurbatov, S.: A university of the world class as a materialization of the idea of an elite educational institution. Manag. Soc. Syst. Phil. Psychol. Pedag. Soc. 3, 11–18 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. Kurbatov, S.: Theoretical and methodological perspectives of international university ratings development. High. Educ. Ukraine. 1, 34–39 (2015a)Google Scholar
  12. Kurbatov, S.: University rankings and their influence on contemporary academic policy. Ann. Sci. Polit. 4(2), 75–79 (2015b)Google Scholar
  13. Kurbatov, S.: Modern British innovations in the development of international university rankings. High. Educ. Ukraine. 1, 65–73 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. Leydesdorff, L.: Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journals evaluation. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 59(2), 278–287 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pavlenko, A., Antonyuk, L., (Eds): Research Universities: world experience and development prospects in Ukraine: Monograph. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv. National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Institute of higher education, 350 p. KNEU, Kyiv (2014)Google Scholar
  16. QS World University Rankings. (2017). Accessed 18 June 2017
  17. Shanghai Ranking Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). (2017). Accessed 18 June 2017
  18. Sheremetieva, O.: Legal status and features of a research university in modern conditions (in the context of the law of Ukraine “on higher education”). Legal Regul. Econ. 14, 29–40 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. (2017). Accessed 18 June 2017
  20. Wedlin, L.: Playing the Ranking Game. Field Formation and Boundary-work in European Management Education. University of Uppsala, 242 p. (2004)Google Scholar
  21. Wedlin, L.: The role of ranking in codifying a business school template: classification, diffusion and mediated isomorphism in organizational fields. Eur. Manag. Rev. 4, 24–39 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhylinska, O.: Research universities in commercialization of R&D results. Modern science and technology: from fundamental research to commercialization of R & D results. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, pp. 171–173. Phoenix, Kyiv (2010)Google Scholar
  23. Zhylinska, O.: Complementary effects in development activation of scientific and technological activities in information society. Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko Kiev National University. Series: Economics. 9(186), 6–15 (2016). Google Scholar
  24. Zong, F., Wang, L.: Evaluation of university scientific research ability based on the output of sci-tech papers: a D-AHP approach. PLoS One. 12(2), (2017.) Accessed 17 June 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Taras Shevchenko National University of KyivKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations