Skip to main content

Rights Can Coexist with Buddhism: A Buddhist Response to Ellen Zhang

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 230 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advancing Global Bioethics ((AGBIO,volume 9))

Abstract

My response to Ellen Zhang’s article in the book is that I argue that the conception of individual rights can coexist with the basic tenets of Buddhist philosophy that emphasize interdependence and compassion. Normally these two traits make it rather difficult to see how the individual rights, which are often regarded as presupposed by individuals as separate, autonomous entities, could be justified through a system of thought that emphasize just the opposite. However, if we imagine an ideal society where everyone acts as if they fully respect the rights of one another, we would see that the rights as expressly specified and written down are not necessary, as they are already implicit in the behavior of the members of the ideal society. According to the Buddhist viewpoint, such a society embodies the ideal of living together, where one is totally unselfish and is totally dedicated to the welfare of others. This society thus is morally perfect according to the Buddhist system of compassion and interdependence, and there is no need to emphasize the separate and autonomous nature of individuals in order to justify it. However, since the end result is the same, this ideal situation shows that it is possible that the individual rights regime can indeed coexist with Buddhism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a clear introduction to Buddhist philosophy, see Siderits (2007) and Gethin (1998).

  2. 2.

    For a more detailed discussion of the 30 baht scheme, see, for example, Damrongplasit and Melnick (2009). For a more critical outlook, see Hughes and Leethongdee (2007).

References

  • Damrongplasit, K., and G.A. Melnick. 2009. Early results from Thailand’s 30 Baht health reform: Something to smile about. Health Affairs 28 (3): 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gethin, R. 1998. The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D., and S. Leethongdee. 2007. Universal coverage in the land of smiles: Lessons from Thailand’s 30 baht health reforms. Health Affairs 26 (4): 999–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siderits, M. 2007. Buddhism as philosophy: An introduction. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soraj Hongladarom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hongladarom, S. (2018). Rights Can Coexist with Buddhism: A Buddhist Response to Ellen Zhang. In: Tham, J., Durante, C., García Gómez, A. (eds) Religious Perspectives on Social Responsibility in Health . Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71849-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics