Skip to main content

The Universal Human Right to Access to Effective Health Care: A Catholic Christian Response to Aasim Padela

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religious Perspectives on Social Responsibility in Health

Part of the book series: Advancing Global Bioethics ((AGBIO,volume 9))

  • 234 Accesses

Abstract

In Western, democratic societies, law and faith are usually kept distinct. Nevertheless did religious ideas also have a significant impact on the development of legal ideas in the Western world. This has been most notable in the development of human rights law based on Natural Law thought. Yet, human rights are universal and not dependent on specific cultural ideas, which is also the idea behind the universal accessibility of Natural Law. Today, human rights are defined in international documents, both binding treaties and non-binding but nevertheless notable, soft law documents. The right to access to effective health care is universal in nature and not dependent on citizenship, gender, age, faith, or other factors. While it was the Western world, which had been shaped by Christianity, which formed international law until long into the twentieth century, today’s international law is based on the global community which no longer includes sovereign nations but encompasses everybody. This text looks at the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights from a comparative cultural-religious perspective. The focus, though, is on the issue of universality and on the question how the universal approach found in Catholic Christianity has contributed to universality in modern human rights thinking, in particular when it comes to the right to access to effective health care. This then leads to the question of positive human rights obligations in the context of social responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See (Dabrock 2004, p. 20).

  2. 2.

    For an overview over the Catholic position in bioethics, see (May 2008); for an excellent introduction to Biolaw from a Catholic perspective, see (Palazzani 2002) and, (Palazzani 2009).

  3. 3.

    (Joyner 2005, p. 212). Specifically for the possibility of the UNESCO Declaration becoming customary international law, see (Faunce 2005, p. 177).

  4. 4.

    See (Andorno 2007, p. 152) and Andorno’s rejection of this claim ibid.

  5. 5.

    See (Häyry and Takala 2005, p. 231).

  6. 6.

    See, e.g., (Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. 2004).

  7. 7.

    See also the development from Matthew 15:24 to Matthew 28:19. The Bible translations used for the creation of this text are The New American Bible and Biblia Sacra Vulgatae Editionis.

  8. 8.

    See (Allen 2009, pp. 21 et seq).

  9. 9.

    Galatians 3:28.

  10. 10.

    See (Paúl 2012).

  11. 11.

    See the examples provided by (Faunce 2005, p. 177).

  12. 12.

    (Kirchner 2013a, p. 29), footnotes omitted. Note that the apparent contradiction to No. 1955 of the Catechism in this earlier text concerning the phrase “divine law” is based on a more narrow use of the terms “law” and “divine” in my 2013 text when compared to the Catechism and is by no means to be understood to mean a difference in substance, which, I would hope, is clarified later in my 2013 text when the God as the source of Natural Law is highlighted but which could be misunderstood if one were to look only at that particular passage. It can even be argued that God is the ultimate reason for human compliance with legal or moral norms, see (Hoerster 2009, p. 60) but see also ibid., p. 71.

  13. 13.

    (Langlois 2008, p. 49); see also more generally (Andorno 2002, pp. 960 et seq).

  14. 14.

    Luke 10:29–37.

  15. 15.

    On suffering, see (John Paul II 2014).

  16. 16.

    On problems associated with such an approach from a legal rather than a theological perspective, see (Kirchner 2011, pp. 66 et seq).

  17. 17.

    On the Catholic perspective, see (Hartin 1999, pp. 57 et seq).

  18. 18.

    See in more detail (Andorno 2009), reprinted as (Andorno 2013).

References

  • Allen, J.L. 2009. Das neue Gesicht der Kirche – Die Zukunft des Katholizismus. 1st ed. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Convention on Human Rights [Pact of San Jose]. 2014. http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B-32American_Convention_on_Human_Rights.htm. Last accessed 1 November 2014.

  • Andorno, R. 2002. Biomedicine and international human rights law: In search of a global consensus. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 80: 959–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Global bioethics at UNESCO: In defense of the universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Journal of Medical Ethics 33: 150–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34: 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013a. Global bioethics at UNESCO: The universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. In Principles of international biolaw – Seeking common ground at the intersection of bioethics and human rights, ed. Roberto Andorno, 1st ed. Brussels: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Human dignity and human rights as a framework for international biolaw. In Principles of international biolaw – Seeking common ground at the intersection of bioethics and human rights, ed. Roberto Andorno, 1st ed. Brussels: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catechism of the Catholic Church. 1997. Completed and updated, with modification from the Editio Typica, 2nd ed. New York/London/Toronto/Sydney/Auckland: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. 2004. In the context of international law Pontifical Council for justice and peace. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en.html, No.437.

  • Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [European Convention on Human Rights]. 2014. European Treaty Series No. 5, http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf. Last accessed 1 November 2014.

  • Dabrock, P. 2004. Fundamentaltheologische Bioethik angesichts der Herausforderungen moderner Gesellschaft. In Menschenwürde und Lebensschutz-Herausforderungen theologischer Bioethik, ed. Peter Dabrock, Lars Klinnert, and Stefanie Schardien, 1st ed. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faunce, T.A. 2005. Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO universal bioethics declaration. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra Martins, A.M. 2013. Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanos. 1st ed. Coimbra: Almedina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartin, P.J. 1999. A spirituality of perfection – Faith in action in the letter of James. 1st ed. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häyry, M., and T. Takala. 2005. Human dignity, bioethics and human rights. Developing World Bioethics 5: 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerster, N. 2009. Ist Gott unverzichtbar für die Moral? In Wozu Gott? Religion zwischen Fundamentalismus und Fortschritt, ed. P. Peter Kemper, A. Mentzer, and U. Sonnenschein, 1st ed. Frankfurt am Main/Leipzip: Verlag der Weltreligionen.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Paul II. 2014. Salvifici doloris. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_11021984_salvifici-doloris_en.html. Last accessed 1 Nov 2014.

  • Joas, H. 2011. Die Sakralität der Person – Eine neue Genealogie der Menschenrechte. 1st ed. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, C.C. 2005. International law in the 21st century-rules for global governance. 1st ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, S. 2004. Relative normativity and the constitutional dimension of international law: A place for values in the international legal system? German Law Journal 5: 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011a. Faith, ethics and religious norms in a globalized environment: Freedom of religion as a challenge to the regulation of Islamic finance in Europe. Baltic Journal of Law and Politics 1 (4): 52–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Multidimensional origins of biolaw and bioethics and their impact on conceptions of human rights and human dignity-a European perspective. Munich: GRIN Verlag GmbH 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011c. Personhood and the right to life under the European convention on human rights: Current and future challenges of modern (bio-)technology. University of Warmia-Mazury Law Review 3: 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012a. Turning religious values into law through the language of human rights: Legal ethics and the right to life under the European Convention on Human Rights. Baltic Journal of Law and Politics 5 (1): 70–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. The personal scope of the right to life under article 2(1) of the European convention on human rights after the judgment in A, B and C v. Ireland. German Law Journal 13: 783–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013a. Natural law as Biolaw. Jurisprudencija 20: 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Biomedicine, biotechnology and the European convention on human rights: Life before birth. Law and Forensic Science 6: 8–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015a. Transcultural biolaw in a hyper-commercialized society, forthcoming (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. Unbalanced on a slippery slope? A shift in the right to life jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights with regard to Poland, forthcoming (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, A. 2008. The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights: Perspectives from Kenya and South Africa. Health Care Analysis 16: 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, W.E. 2008. Catholic bioethics and the gift of human life. 2nd ed. Huntington: Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzani, L. 2002. Introduzione alla Biogiuridica. 1st ed. Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Introduction to the philosophy of biolaw. 1st ed. Rome: Edizioni Studium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paúl, A. 2012. Controversial conceptions: The unborn and the American Convention on Human Rights. Loyola University Chicago International Law Review 9: 209–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichon, J. 2006. Does the unborn child have a right to life? The insufficient answer of the European court of human rights in the judgment Vo v. France. German Law Journal 7: 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlinson, M.C., and A. Donchin. 2005. The quest for universality: Reflections on the universal draft declaration on bioethics and human rights. Developing World Bioethics 5: 258–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Römelt, J. 2006. Menschenwürde und Freiheit – Rechtsethik und Theologie des Rechts jenseits von Naturrecht und Positivismus. 1st ed. Freiburg/Basel/Vienna: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statute of the International Court of Justice. 2014a. http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/?p1=4&p2=2#CHAPTER_I. Last accessed 1 November 2014.

  • Statute of the International Court of Justice. 2014b. Article 59 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice reads as follows: “The decision of the Court has no binding force except between the parties and in respect of that particular case. http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/?p1=4&p2=2#CHAPTER_I. Last accessed 1 November 2014.

  • Statute of the International Court of Justice. 2014c. Article 38 (1) Statute of the International Court of Justice. http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/?p1=4&p2=2#CHAPTER_I. Last accessed 1 November 2014.

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. 2014a. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Last accessed 1 November 2014.

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. 2014b. Article 14 UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Last accessed 1 November 2014.

  • Williams, J.R. 2005. UNESCO’s proposed declaration on bioethics and human rights – A bland compromise. Developing World Bioethics 5: 210–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Kirchner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kirchner, S. (2018). The Universal Human Right to Access to Effective Health Care: A Catholic Christian Response to Aasim Padela. In: Tham, J., Durante, C., García Gómez, A. (eds) Religious Perspectives on Social Responsibility in Health . Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71849-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics