Skip to main content

Minimun Decency as Ordinary and Proportionate Healthcare Provision: A Christian Response to Ruiping Fan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religious Perspectives on Social Responsibility in Health

Part of the book series: Advancing Global Bioethics ((AGBIO,volume 9))

  • 224 Accesses

Abstract

The endorsement of the first part of Article 14 by Confucianism in that governments should promote health and social developments of its people would find resonance in Catholic social teachings which promotes the exercise of authority as a service. The centrality of the family in society is similarly emphasized by both religions. The right to health may imply a radical egalitarian approach rejected by Confucianism. This is echoed in the Catholic teaching of ordinary versus extraordinary means of therapy. The Catholic vision of equality in the dignity of human persons incorporates a need for service of love (caritas), which expresses itself as love of neighbor. Although Confucianism does not directly address the matter of human solidarity, the codification of obligations between different members of society maintains a structure for maintaining such solidarity. Finally an exploration of ordinary and proportionate means of therapy in the context of current scientific and technological advances may help to set an appropriate minimal decent standard of healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The passage recounted Confucius passing by a woman wailing in grief at a tomb. She had lost her husband’s father, husband, and son to man-eating tigers but refused to leave the locality because there was no oppressive government there. Hence Confucius taught his followers oppressive government was more terrible than tigers (Legge 1885).

References

  • Arrhenius, Gustaf, Jesper Ryberg, and Torbjörn Tännsjö. 2014. “The repugnant conclusion,” The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/repugnant-conclusion/.

  • Catechism of the Catholic Church, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Citta del Vaticano. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Declaration on Euthanasia, Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deus Caritas Est, Benedict XVI. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Book of Rites (English version: “Sacred books of the East, volume 28, part 4: The Li Ki,” James Legge, 1885).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2010. The Report of the International Bioethics of UNESCO on Social Responsibility and Health.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Au-Yeung, P. (2018). Minimun Decency as Ordinary and Proportionate Healthcare Provision: A Christian Response to Ruiping Fan. In: Tham, J., Durante, C., García Gómez, A. (eds) Religious Perspectives on Social Responsibility in Health . Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71849-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics