Tragic Monarchy: Saul and Macbeth

  • Mary Jo Kietzman
Chapter

Abstract

Shakespeare builds Macbeth’s tragedy on the tragedy of Israel’s first king, Saul, who goes mad and visits the witch of Endor. The biblical subtexts of Macbeth enabled Shakespeare to debate James I on favorite scriptural passages. James opens his “Trew Law of Free Monarchies” (1598) with a lengthy reading of I Samuel 8—warning about kings—as an argument for divine right rule. But Samuel is an ambitious cleric and Shakespeare refigured his equivocal prophecy into that which Macbeth receives from witches. For Shakespeare, as for the writer of I Samuel, monarchy is tragic from its inception because it entails the murder of saintly Duncan—a murder which refigures the Israelites’ rejection of God for a king. The corrective to tragic monarchy is a covenantal coalition: Birnan Wood moving toward Dunsinane.

References

Articles

  1. H.W.B., “Saul and Macbeth.” The Sewanee Review 1 (May 1893): 273–282.Google Scholar
  2. Jack, Jane. “Macbeth, King James, and the Bible.” ELH: English Literary History 22 (Sep. 1955): 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lowrance, Bryan. “‘Modern Ecstasy’: Macbeth and the Meaning of the Political.” ELH: English Literary History 79 (2012): 823–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Weidhorn, Manfred, “Saul and Macbeth, Again.” Notes and Queries 62.4 (1 Dec. 2015): 569–572.Google Scholar

Books

  1. Clare, Janet. “Art Made Tongue-tied by Authority”: Elizabethan and Jacobean Dramatic Censorship. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. DeLapp, Nevada Levi. The Reformed David(s) and the Question of Resistance to Tyranny: Reading the Bible in the 16th and 17th Centuries. Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 601; Scriptural Traces: Critical Perspectives on the Reception and Influence of the Bible 3. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
  3. Diehl, Huston. Staging Reform, Reforming the Stage: Protestantism and Popular Theater in Early Modern England. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. Elazar, Daniel. Covenant and Polity in Biblical Israel. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. Greenblatt, Stephen. Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. New York: Norton, 2004.Google Scholar
  6. Guibbory, Achsah. Christian Identity, Jews, and Israel in Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gunn, David. The Fate of King Saul: An Interpretation of a Biblical Story. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of Old Testament, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. Hamlin, Hannibal. The Bible in Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammill, Graham. The Mosaic Constitution: Political Theology and Imagination from Machiavelli to Milton. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holinshed, Raphael. “Duff and Duncan.” In Macbeth. Edited by Robert S. Miola, 156–172. New York: W.W. Norton, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. James I, King of England. The Political Works of James I. Edited by Charles McIlwain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1918.Google Scholar
  12. ———. “Demonology,” in Witchcraft in Early-Modern Scotland: James VI’s Demonology and the North Berwick Witches. Edited by Lawrence Normand and Gareth Roberts. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Jordan, Constance. Shakespeare’s Monarchies: Ruler and Subject in the Romances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. Miola, Robert S., ed. William Shakespeare: Macbeth. A Norton Critical Edition. New York: W.W. Norton, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. Nicholson, Sarah, Three Faces of Saul: An Intertextual Approach to Biblical Tragedy. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. Palfrey, Simon. Doing Shakespeare. Bloomsbury: Methuen Drama, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parry, Graham. The Seventeenth-Century: The Intellectual and Cultural Context of English Literature, 1603–1700. New York: Longman, 1989.Google Scholar
  18. Prescott, Anne Lake. “Exploiting King Saul in Early Modern England: Good Uses for a Bad King.” In Religious Diversity and Early Modern English Texts: Catholic, Judaic, Feminist, and Secular Dimensions. Edited by Arthur F. Marotti and Chanita Goodblatt. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  19. Rickard, Jane. Writing the Monarch in Jacobean England: Jonson, Donne, Shakespeare and the Works of King James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shuger, Debora. Political Theologies in Shakespeare’s England: The Sacred and the State in Measure for Measure. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sitze, Adam. “The Tragicity of the Political: A Note on Carlo Galli’s Reading of Carl Schmitt’s Hamlet or Hecuba.” In Political Theology and Early Modernity. Edited by Graham Hammill and Julia Reinhard Lupton, 48–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  22. Steussy, Marti. Samuel and His God. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  23. Thomson, Peter. Shakespeare’s Professional Career. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  24. Tushima, Cephas T. A. The Fate of Saul’s Progeny in the Reign of David. Cambridge: James Clarke, 2011.Google Scholar
  25. Walzer, Michael. In God’s Shadow: Politics in the Hebrew Bible. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Jo Kietzman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Michigan–FlintFlintUSA

Personalised recommendations