The Ethics of Teaching Tragic Narratives

  • Sean McEvoy
Chapter
Part of the Teaching the New English book series (TENEEN)

Abstract

Should we not reflect more on the ethical consequences of taking narratives of violent death, mutilation, pain and degradation—often with no sense of redemption—into a room full of impressionable young people? In the ancient world, Plato and Aristotle clashed over the issue of the moral effects of tragedy upon its readers and audiences. Having considered their arguments, I go on to discuss how effective (and ethical) modes of teaching tragedy may be where role play and distancing techniques are employed. I survey political critiques of the genre, including some contemporary claims that certain texts can cause psychological harm to students. I conclude that when we teach tragedy we are actually conducting a philosophical exploration into the nature of value itself in an open-eyed, honest way which can only be of benefit to us all.

Works Cited

  1. Aeschylus. 2011. Agamemnon. In The Complete Aeschylus, Vol. 1: The Oresteia, trans. and ed. Peter Burian and Alan Shapiro. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. 2013. The Poetics. Translated by Anthony Kenny. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bond, Edward. 2013. Notes to Young Writers. The Activist Papers [1976], in: Plays: Four. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  4. Brecht, Bertolt. 2015. Brecht on Theatre. Edited by Marc Silberman, Steve Giles, and Tom Kuhn, 3rd ed. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  5. Bromwich, David. 2016. What Are We Allowed to Say? London Review of Books 38 (18): 3–10. September 22, 2016. http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n18/david-bromwich/what-are-we-allowed-to-say
  6. Eagleton, Terry. 2008. Commentary. In Rethinking Tragedy, ed. Rita Felski. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2015. Hope Without Optimism. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  8. Felski, Rita. 2008. Rethinking Tragedy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Furedi, Frank. 2014. First World War: Still No End in Sight. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  10. Goldhill, Simon. 2004. Love, Sex and Tragedy: Why Classics Matters. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  11. Gritzner, Karoline. 2015. Adorno and Modern Theatre: The Drama of the Damaged Self in Bond, Rudkin, Barker and Kane. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall, Edith, and Fiona Macintosh. 2005. Greek Tragedy and the British Theatre, 1660–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, George W. 2006. Reason’s Grief: An Essay on Tragedy and Value. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McEvoy, Sean. 2017. Tragedy: The Basics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Nuttall, Anthony. 1996. Why Does Tragedy Give Pleasure? Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Plato. 1974. The Republic. Translated by Desmond Lee, 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  17. Rauch, Jonathan. 2014. Kindly Inquisitors: The New Attacks on Free Thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wallace, Jennifer. 2007. The Cambridge Introduction to Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Williams, Joanna. 2016. Academic Freedom in an Age of Conformity: Confronting the Fear of Knowledge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Williams, Raymond. 1979. Modern Tragedy. Rev. ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Woodruff, Paul. 2008. The Necessity of Theater. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sean McEvoy
    • 1
  1. 1.Varndean CollegeBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations