Skip to main content

Complementary Collections in Ligeti’s Désordre

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mathematics and Computation in Music (MCM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10527))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1110 Accesses

Abstract

This paper examines one aspect of Ligeti’s approach to writing music that is neither tonal nor atonal—the use of complementary collections to achieve what Richard Steinitz has termed combinatorial tonality. After a brief introduction, the paper explores properties of the intervallic content both within and between complementary collections, which I term the intra- and inter-harmonies. In particular, the inter-harmonies are useful in understanding harmonic control in works based on complementary collections, as demonstrated by revisiting Lawrence Quinnett’s analysis of Ligeti’s first Piano Étude, Désordre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    My thanks to Nancy Rogers and an anonymous reviewer for comments that greatly improved this paper.

  2. 2.

    The reader is strongly directed to Amiot [1] for an excellent and detailed presentation of the interval function and its relation to recent applications of the discrete Fourier transform in music theory.

  3. 3.

    Multiplicity of pc interval i is indicated by the \(i^{th}\) component of the interval function, which begins with pc interval 0.

  4. 4.

    The distinctiveness of a collection, A, can also be measured in terms of the magnitude of its interval content, \(\Vert \text {IC}_A \Vert _2\). (See Callender [4].) For the present purposes, the standard deviation is preferable.

  5. 5.

    This follows directly from the complement theorem. See Hanson [6] and Lewin [7].

  6. 6.

    Measuring the distance between intra- and inter-harmonies using other metrics, such as angular (or cosine) distance, yields similar relative distances. (See Rogers [11].) The Euclidean metric is sufficient and advantageous for the present purposes.

  7. 7.

    Statistical analysis of Désordre was greatly aided by Cuthbert’s music21 [5], which is a Python toolkit for computer-aided musicology.

  8. 8.

    Comparison of interval counts with the inter-harmonies in Désordre in both Quinnett’s treatise and the current paper stem from our conversations while Quinnett was a student at Florida State University.

  9. 9.

    Note that because there are more than a single degree of freedom in the data, \(\phi \) is not normalized to a maximum of 1.

References

  1. Amiot, E.: Music Through Fourier Space. Springer, Switzerland (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45581-5

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bossin, J.: György Ligeti’s new lyricism and the aesthetic of currentness: the Berlin festival’s retrospective of the composer’s career. Current Musicol. 37(8) (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bregman, A.: Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. MIT Press, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Callender, C.: Continuous harmonic spaces. J. Music Theor. 51(2), 277–332 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuthbert, M.: music21: a toolkit for computer-aided musicology. http://web.mit.edu/music21/

  6. Hanson, H.: The Harmonic Materials of Twentieth-Century Music. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewin, D.: Generalized Music Intervals and Transformations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lewin, D.: Forte’s interval vector, my interval function, and regener’s common-note function. J. Music Theor. 21(2), 194–237 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinzler, H.: Decision and automatism in ‘Désordre’: 1re Étude. Premier Livre. Interface 20(2), 89–124 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quinnett, L.: Harmony and counterpoint in Ligeti Études. In: Book I: An Analysis and Performance Guide. Doctoral Treatise, Florida State University (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers, D.: A geometric approach to PCSet similarity. Perspect. New Music 37(1), 77–90 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Steinitz, R.: The dynamics of disorder. Musical Times 137(1839), 7–14 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clifton Callender .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Callender, C. (2017). Complementary Collections in Ligeti’s Désordre . In: Agustín-Aquino, O., Lluis-Puebla, E., Montiel, M. (eds) Mathematics and Computation in Music. MCM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10527. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71827-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71827-9_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71826-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71827-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics