Skip to main content

Interval Content vs. DFT

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mathematics and Computation in Music (MCM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10527))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Several ways to appreciate the diatonicity of a pc-set can be proposed: Anatol Vierù enumerates connected fifths (or semitones, as an indicator of chromaticity), Aline Honing similarly measures ‘interval categories’ against prototype pc-sets [8]; numerous generalizations of the diatonic scales have been advanced, for instance John Clough and Jack Douthett ‘hyperdiatonic’ [5] which supersedes Ethan Agmon’s model [1] and the tetrachordal structure of the usual diatonic, and many others. The present paper purports to show that magnitudes of Fourier coefficients, or ‘saliency’ as introduced by Ian Quinn in [9], provide better measurements of diatonicity, chromaticity, octatonicity...The latter case may help solve the controversies about the octatonic character of slavic music in the beginning of the XX\(^{th}\) century, and generally disambiguate appreciation of hitherto mostly subjective musical characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In short, in his theory a poor mode is a subset of several rich modes.

  2. 2.

    Going to extreme cases: is a single note diatonic? What about a minor third?

  3. 3.

    Among other things, it does not integrate the group structure of intervals modulo octave, not to mention subtler features. As G. Mazzolla wryly observes in the preface of [10], it is hopeless to try and apprehend the huge complexity of music with only the simplest mathematical tools – though this complexity can be reconstructed from all its simplifications, if one construes ‘simplification’ as ‘forgetful functor’.

  4. 4.

    The machinery involved, as we will develop below, is actually an algebra structure (with a convolution product) on the vector space of distributions, i.e. vectors describing how much of C, C\(\sharp \), D and so on, are featured in a much generalized pc-set.

  5. 5.

    Up to a constant.

  6. 6.

    For technical reasons that will be made clear below, we do not take into account the symmetries, e.g. \({{\mathrm{{\mathbf {iv}}}}}(n-k) = {{\mathrm{{\mathbf {iv}}}}}(k)\) and consider \({{\mathrm{{\mathbf {iv}}}}}_X\) as a vector in \(\mathbf R^n\).

  7. 7.

    Just check the number of common tones between X and \(X+5\), using the second formula in the definition above.

  8. 8.

    Actually overrated since every tritone is tallied twice.

  9. 9.

    Many other examples can be devised if this one does not sound convincing to you. A more blatant one would be \(\{0,2,7,9\}\) vs. \(\{0,1,7,8\}\), both with \({{\mathrm{{\mathbf {iv}}}}}(5)=2\).

  10. 10.

    “J’ai élaboré un procédé pour mesurer le degré de diatonisme et de chromatisme d’un mode, basé sur la comparaison de la suite des quintes parfaites connexes avec la suite des demi-tons connexes à l’intérieur du même mode.” [12]; Definition 1 is more or less a translation of this.

  11. 11.

    Vierù had discerned that the two notions are interchanged by multiplication by 5 (or 7) modulo 12, the classical \(M_5\) (or \(M_7\)) operator; and offered thoughtful insights on this dichotomy as expressed by the affine group on \(\mathbf Z_{12}\).

  12. 12.

    In some cases this may not the best for coincidence measurements: the more compact form of a pc-set adresses its chromaticity, not its diatonicity – consider the preceding discussion where the pc-set is first transformed by \(M_5\).

  13. 13.

    One can compute them online at http://canonsrythmiques.free.fr/MaRecherche/styled/.

  14. 14.

    Originally discovered by Quinn [9] and formally proved in excruciating detail in [2].

  15. 15.

    The length of a complex number \(x + i y\) is \(\Vert (x, y)\Vert = |x + i y| =\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\).

  16. 16.

    In a convincing study of Ruth Crawford Seeger’s White Moon [17].

  17. 17.

    This is characteristic of DFT up to permutations: see [3], Theorem 1.11.

  18. 18.

    Yust observed that conversely – by inverse DFT – the number of common tones between two pc-sets can be expressed as a sum of products of magnitudes of Fourier coefficients, pondered by cosines of the differences of phases.

  19. 19.

    It has quadratic complexity, while termwise product is linear.

  20. 20.

    It would be even simpler for chromaticity (as suggested by a reviewer) but of less interest for actual analysis.

  21. 21.

    One can use either 5 or 7 as generator of a chain of fifths.

  22. 22.

    But also almost connected chains, like F C G A E B.

  23. 23.

    As a shrewd reviewer noticed, it would also be feasible to correlate interval profiles, but our aim is to find a recipe at once simple, general and efficient.

  24. 24.

    The converse is not true: consider CDE which is undoubtedly diatonic though \({{\mathrm{{\mathbf {iv}}}}}(5)=0\)!

  25. 25.

    It appears that there is little difference when the time-span of the window is expanded from 1 to 2 or even 3 s.

  26. 26.

    Up to the cardinality of pc-sets. On these pictures, the dotted line shows the mean value of a saliency and the solid line a reference value – for \(a_5\), say, it is the mean value found for a Mozart Sonata.

  27. 27.

    Hopefully more exhaustive analyses of saliency of Slavic music of early XX\(^{th}\) century will soon appear, and settle once and for all the question of their octatonicity.

  28. 28.

    His chords systematically include all twelve pcs.

  29. 29.

    Technically this is true since the music can be retrieved from the data of all Fourier coefficients.

References

  1. Agmon, E.: A mathematical model of the diatonic system. J. Music Theor. 33(1), 1–25 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amiot, E.: David Lewin and maximally even sets. JMM 1(3), 157–172 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Amiot, E.: Music Through Fourier Space. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Callender, C.: Continuous harmonic spaces. J. Music Theor. 51, 2 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough, J., Douthett, J.: Maximally even sets. J. Music Theor. 35, 93–173 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Forte, A.: A theory of set-complexes for music. J. Music Theor. 8, 136–184 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Honingh, A., Bod, R.: Clustering and classification of music by interval categories. In: Agon, C., Andreatta, M., Assayag, G., Amiot, E., Bresson, J., Mandereau, J. (eds.) MCM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6726, pp. 346–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21590-2_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Honingh, A., Bod, R.: Pitch class set categories as analysis tools for degree of tonality. In: Proceedings of ISMIR, Utrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quinn, I.: General equal-tempered harmony. Pers. New Music 44(2), 114–118 (2006). 45(1) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mazzola, G.: Topos of Music. Birkhauser, Boston (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Tymoczko, D.: Colloquy: Stravinsky and the octatonic: octatonicism reconsidered again. Music Theor. Spect. 25(1), 185–202 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vierù, A.: Un regard rétrospectif sur la théorie des modes. The Book of Modes. Editura Muzicala, Bucarest, pp. 48 sqq (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yust, J.: Schubert’s harmonic language and Fourier phase space. J. Music Theor. 59, 121–181 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yust, J.: Restoring the structural status of keys through DFT phase space. In: Pareyon, G., Pina-Romero, S., Agustín-Aquino, O., Lluis-Puebla, E. (eds.) The Musical-Mathematical Mind. Computational Music Science. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47337-6_32

  15. Yust, J.: Applications of DFT to the theory of twentieth-century harmony. In: Collins, T., Meredith, D., Volk, A. (eds.) MCM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9110, pp. 207–218. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20603-5_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Yust, J.: Analysis of twentieth-century music using the Fourier transform. Music Theory Society of New York State, Binghamton (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yust, J.: Special collections: renewing set theory. J. Music Theor. 60(2), 213–262 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Amiot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Amiot, E. (2017). Interval Content vs. DFT. In: Agustín-Aquino, O., Lluis-Puebla, E., Montiel, M. (eds) Mathematics and Computation in Music. MCM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10527. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71827-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71827-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71826-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71827-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics