Closeness and Distance in Media Reports on the Trollhättan Attack

  • Marta Kolankiewicz
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture book series (PSCMC)

Abstract

This chapter explores the Swedish media reporting on the Trollhättan school attack, in which a pupil and two school staff members were killed and another pupil injured by a young man. The day after the attack the police declared that the attack had been a hate crime, since the victims had been selected because of their skin colour. I am interested in the first twenty-four hours after the attack—the time from when the news about the attack broke until the moment that a hegemonic knowledge about the attack was established—and claim that the media played a special role in installing frames, through which the audience could look at the event. Drawing on Judith Butler’s theory of frames and Lilie Chouliaraki’s theories of media discourses as construing suffering as being worthy or not of the spectator’s pity, I identify three different frames installed by the media during this time: of the compassionate spectatorship, of a threatening suburb and of a racist act. I analyse these frames and explore the possibilities they offer for audiences in terms of distance to the suffering other.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Back, L. (2011). Reflecting on the Riots. LSE British Politicast Episode 1. Retrieved July 6, 2017, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/politicast-1/
  3. Butler, J. (2009). Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The Spectatorship of Suffering. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Chouliaraki, L. (2013). The Ironic Spectator: Solidarity in the Age of Post-Humanitarianism. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ericsson, U., et al. (2002). Miljonprogram Och Media: Föreställningar om Människor Och Förorter. Stockholm: Riksantikvarieämbetet; Norrköping: Integrationsverket.Google Scholar
  7. Garde-Hansen, J., & Gorton, K. (2013). Emotion Online: Theorizing Affect on the Internet. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Kolankiewicz, M. (2015). Anti-Muslim Violence and the Possibility of Justice. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
  9. Rattansi, A. (2007). Racism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Sheldon, R. (2016). Tragic Encounters and Ordinary Ethics. Palestine-Israel in British Universities. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2012). Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Sontag, S. (2004). Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Kolankiewicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Lund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations