Skip to main content

Conclusion: Rhetorical Education and the Local Production of Global Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Rhetoric and the Global Turn in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Rhetoric, Politics and Society ((RPS))

  • 195 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter concludes by calling on rhetorical scholars and educators to pursue two key collaborative projects—a project of institutional research and critique that draws on their collective rhetorical knowledge and resources to critically interrogate the questions and motives of global higher education, and a project of curricular research that examines the role rhetoric, communication, and composing play in courses on global issues that are taught across the curriculum. The chapter calls for these collaborative projects as a local means toward making room for rhetorical education in the rapidly globalizing curriculum of US colleges and universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, the mission of the University of Arizona’s Aerospace/Defense/Homeland Security Program is described on the program’s website as follows: “At the UA, our scientists are dedicated to protecting the United States. Research endeavors that focus on homeland security, defense, and aerospace permeate all corners of the institution, ensuring that we meet the strategic needs of our country.”

  2. 2.

    See also David Harvey’s Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom for a discussion of disciplinarity, politics, and colonialism.

Bibliography

  • Adler-Kassner, Linda. 2008. The Activist WPA: Changing Stories About Writing and Writers. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • American Council on Education. 2003. Internationalizing the Campus: A User’s Guide. Prepared by Madeleine F. Green and Christa Olson. Washington, DC: American Council on Education Center for Institutional and International Initiatives. American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun. 2013. “The Future as Cultural Fact.” In The Future as Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition, 285–300. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannels, Deanna P., and Amy L. Housley Gaffney. 2009.“Communication Across the Curriculum and in the Disciplines: A Call for Cross-curricular Advocacy.” Communication Education 58, no. 1: 124–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira Andreotti, Vanessa, Lynn Mario, and T.M. de Souza. 2012. “Introduction: (Towards) Global Citizenship Education ‘Otherwise’.” In Postcolonial Perspectives on Global Citizenship Education, edited by de Oliveira Andreotti, Vanessa, Lynn Mario, and T.M. de Souza. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, David. 1998. “Rhetoric as a Course of Study.” College English. 61, no. 2. (November): 169–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, Anthony. 2005. “Liberal Education and Communication Against the Disciplines.” Communication Education. 54, no. 1. (January): 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 2009. Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, Gerard. 1999. Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Doug. 2005. “2005 CCCC Chair’s Address: Who Owns Writing?” College Composition and Communication. 57, no. 2. (December): 335–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morello, John T. 2000. “Comparing Speaking Across the Curriculum and Writing Across the Curriculum Programs.” Communication Education 49, no. 1: 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountford, Roxanne. 2011. “A Century After the Divorce: Challenges to a Rapprochement Between Speech Communication and English.” In The Sage Handbook of Rhetorical Studies, edited by Andrea A. Lunsford, Kirt H. Wilson, and Rosa Eberly. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412982795.

  • Petraglia, Joseph. 2003. “Identity Crisis: Rhetoric as an Epistemic and a Pedagogic Discipline.” In The Realms of Rhetoric: The Prospects for Rhetoric Education, edited by Joseph Petraglia and Deepika Bahri, 151–70. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, James E., Patricia Sullivan, Stuart Blythe, Jeffrey T. Grabill, and Libby Miles. 2000. “Institutional Critique: A Rhetorical Methodology for Change.” College Composition and Communication. 51, no. 4: 610–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rood, Craig. 2016. “The Gap Between Rhetorical Education and Civic Discourse.” Review of Communication. 16, no. 2–3: 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, Mark H., Paul D. Umbach, Michael B. Paulsen, and Ernest T. Pascarella. 2009. “Going Global: Understanding the Choice Process of the Intent to Study Abroad.” Research in Higher Education. 50: 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliday, Mary. 2011. Everyday Genres: Writing Assignments Across Disciplines. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syverson, Margaret. 1999. The Wealth of Reality: An Ecology of Composition. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The University of Arizona. 2017. “Aerospace/Defense/Homeland Security.” The University of Arizona. Accessed August 25, 2017. http://www.arizona.edu/information/corporations-businesses/aerospace-defense-homeland-security.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Minnix, C. (2018). Conclusion: Rhetorical Education and the Local Production of Global Higher Education. In: Rhetoric and the Global Turn in Higher Education. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71725-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics