How Financing Shapes a Film Project: Applying Organizational Economics to a Case Study in Norway

Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

This chapter explores key issues in film financing from the perspective of organizational economics. It examines the contractual relationships between investors and producers and analyzes how these relationships affect the formation and implementation of a single film project strategy. I argue that contracting problems can arise as a “natural” part of the financing process and can harm the project strategy in two important ways: (1) Through an incomplete alignment of objectives, which may lead to the formation of ambiguous strategies and (2) through a weak governance structure with insufficient contractual safeguards for the strategy implementation, which may result in deviations from the agreed strategy. Based on an examination of these two problem areas, I suggest a contracting-dependent model that leads to four generic film project strategies and further discuss the performance implications for each of these. Finally, to demonstrate the likely effects in a Scandinavian context, I apply the model to a case study of the current Norwegian film support system.

Keywords

Agency problem Co-financing Contracting Film financing Film policy Film subsidies Investment risk Organizational economics Norway Project financing Project objectives Project strategy Risk mitigation Strategic ambiguity Strategy formation Strategy implementation 

References

  1. Abdallah, C., & Langley, A. (2014). The double edge of ambiguity in strategic planning. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 235–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artto, K., Kujala, J., Dietrich, P., & Martinsuo, M. (2008). What is project strategy? International Journal of Project Management, 26, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach, S. (1985). Final cut: Dreams and disaster in the making of heaven’s gate. New York, NY: W. Morrow.Google Scholar
  4. Baumgarten, P. A., Farber, D. C., & Fleicher, M. (1992). Producing, financing and distributing film: A comprehensive legal and business guide. New York, NY: Limelight Editions.Google Scholar
  5. Bernheim, B. D., & Whinston, M. D. (1986). Common agency. Econometrica, 54(4), 923–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bondebjerg, I., & Redvall, E. N. (2011). A small region in a global world: Patterns in Scandinavian film and TV culture. Copenhagen: Centre for Modern European Studies (CEMES), University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  7. Carson, S. J., Madhok, A., & Wu, T. (2006). Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1058–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chisholm, D. C., Fernández-Blanco, V., Ravid, S. A., & Walls, D. (2015). Economics of motion pictures: The state of the art. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleland, D. I. (1998). Strategic project management. In J. K. Pinto (Ed.), The Project Management Institute project management handbook (pp. 27–54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar
  12. De Vany, A. (2004). Hollywood economics: How extreme uncertainty shapes the film industry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. De Vany, A., & Walls, D. (1999). Uncertainty in the motion picture industry: Does star power reduce the terror of the box office. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(4), 285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Vinck, S. (2009). Europudding or Europaradise? A performance evaluation of the Eurimages co-production film fund, twenty years after its inception. Communications – European Journal of Communication Research, 34(3), 257–285.Google Scholar
  15. Elberse, A. (2007). The power of stars: Do star actors drive the success of movies? Journal of Marketing, 71, 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theroy of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fee, C. E. (2002). The costs of outside equity control: Evidence from the motion picture financing decisions. Journal of Business, 75(4), 681–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaustad, T. (2008). Private film financing: Gains and losses in the Norwegian film sector Research Report (Vol. 1/2008). Oslo: BI Norwegian School of Management.Google Scholar
  19. Gaustad, T. (2013). Creating the image: A transaction cost analysis of joint value creation in the motion picture industry. Oslo: BI Norwegian Business School.Google Scholar
  20. Gaustad, T., Espelien, A., De Paoli, D., & Theie, M. G. (2014). Som du ser meg Menon-Publications. Oslo: Menon Business Economics.Google Scholar
  21. Gibbons, R., & Roberts, J. (2013). Introduction. In R. Gibbons & J. Roberts (Eds.), The handbook of organizational economics (pp. 1–10). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goettler, R. L., & Leslie, P. (2005). Cofinancing to manage risk in the motion picture industry. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 14(2), 231–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanche, Ø., Iversen, G., & Aas, N. K. (2014). Bedre enn sitt rykte: en liten norsk filmhistorie (3rd ed.). Oslo: Norwegian Film Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Hedling, O. (2013). An unintended effect of the introcution of the public support systems – Film policy, film support and the contemporary Scandinavian production landscape. The Nordic Journal of Cultural Policy, 16(1), 90–105.Google Scholar
  25. Hill, J. (2004). UK film policy, cultural capital and social exclusion. Cultural Trends, 13(2), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jansen, C. (2005). The performance of German motion pictures, profits and subsidies: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Cultural Economics, 29, 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 21(2), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lo, A. W., & Pisano, G. P. (2016). Lessons from hollywood: A new approach to funding R&D. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(2), 47–54.Google Scholar
  31. Loeb, G. J., Veblen, M. F., & Desai, M. A. (2002). Strategy and sources of motion picture finance. Harvard Business School Case, 1–16.Google Scholar
  32. Macaulay, S. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. American Sociological Review, 28(1), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norwegian Film Institute. (2016). Kinofilm. http://www.nfi.no/bransje/vare-tilskuddsordninger/kinofilm
  34. Opitz, C., & Hofmann, K. H. (2014). Adverse selection and moral hazard in equity partnerships: Evidence from hollywood’s slate financing agreements. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 23(4), 811–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palia, D., Ravid, S. A., & Reisel, N. (2008). Choosing to cofinance: Analysis of project-specific alliances in the movie industry. Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 483–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Patanakul, P., & Shenhar, A. J. (2012). What project strategy really is: The fundamental building block in strategic project management. Project Management Journal, 43(1), 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poppo, L., Zhou, K. Z., & Ryu, S. (2008). Alternative origins to interorganizational trust: An interdepence perspecitve on the shadow of the past and the shadow of the future. Organization Science, 19(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.Google Scholar
  39. Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  40. Ravid, S. A. (1999). Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. Journal of Business, 72(4), 463–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryssevik, J., Dahle, M., Høgestøl, A., & Myhrvold-Hanssen, T. (2014). Åpen Framtid. Bergen: Ideas2evidence.Google Scholar
  42. Saussier, S. (2000). Transaction costs and contractual incompleteness: The case of Électricité de France. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 42(2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sewordor, E., & Sjoquist, D. L. (2016). Lights, camera, action: The adoption of state film tax credits. Public Budgeting and Finance, 36(2), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Williamson, O. E. (1983). Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. American Economic Review, 73(4), 519–535.Google Scholar
  46. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. Williamson, O. E. (1988). Corporate finance and corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 43(3), 567–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Williamson, O. E. (1993). Opportunism and its critics. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williamson, O. E. (1996). Transaction cost economics and the Carnegie connection. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BI Norwegian Business SchoolOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations