Government Failure: The Ineffectiveness of Italian State Subsidies to Film

Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

Public financial support to national film production is typically conditional on subjective artistic and sociocultural criteria and objectives. Yet the question remains as to whether state subsidies actually help films at the box office: did audiences get to see and appreciate films that otherwise would not have been made? While recognising the complex political and administrative context, the results of this study suggest that the public subsidy regime in Italy between 1995 and 2003 failed to assure the development of an industry as intended, since in an overwhelming number of cases the film revenues of those films supported were not sufficient to cover production costs, even when supported by a subsidy. Drawing from a variety of publically available sources, a dataset was constructed to estimate the profitability of films both supported and not supported by State aid to film in the Italian market. Our approach differs from that of others in that we measure the success of films in the market by the revenues they generate. By factoring in costs of production, a better idea of the costs to society of subsidising film production can be established.

Keywords

Artistic talent Arts and cultural policy Film subsidy Government failure Italian Cinema Market failure Opportunity cost Public choice theory Resource allocation 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. (2001). Inefficient redistribution. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aucoin, P. (1991). The politics and management of restraint budgeting. In A. Blais & D. Dion (Eds.), The budget-maximizing bureaucrat: Appraisal and evidence (pp. 119–142). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  3. Austen-Smith, D. (1986). On justifying subsidies to the performing arts. Journal of Cultural Economics, 18(3), 239–249.Google Scholar
  4. Aydin, U. (2007). Promoting industries in the global economy: Subsidies in OECD countries, 1989 to 1995. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagella, M., & Becchetti, L. (1999). The determinants of motion picture box office performance: Evidence from movies produced in Italy. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(4), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandt, U. S., & Svendsen, G. T. (2009). Trawling for subsidies: The alignment of incentives between fishermen and marine biologists. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(7), 1012–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandler, A. (1966). Strategy and structure. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  8. Chisholm, D. C., Fernandez-Blanco, V., Ravid, S. A., & Walls, W. D. (2015). Economics of motion pictures: The state of the art. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-014-9234-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2004). Read all about it! Understanding the role of media in economic development. Kyklos, 57(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dal Bó, E. (2006). Regulatory capture. A review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Djankov, S., McLeish, C., Nenova, T., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Who owns the media? Journal of Law and Economics, 46, 341–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dollery, B., & Worthington, A. (1996). The evaluation of public policy: Normative economic theories of government failure. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 7(1), 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Downey, J., & Koenig, T. (2006). Is there a European public sphere? The Berlusconi–Schulz case. European Journal of Communication, 21(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. New York: Harper Collins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Easterly, W. (2012). The cartel of good intentions: The problem of bureaucracy in foreign aid. Journal of Policy Reform, 5(4), 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grampp, W. D. (1986). Should the arts support themselves? Economic Affairs, 7(2), 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grampp, W. D. (1989). Rent-seeking in arts policy. Public Choice, 60(2), 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gundle, S. (2000). Between hollywood and Moscow: The Italian Communists and the challenge of mass culture, 1943–1991. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gundle, S., & Parker, S. (1996). The new Italian Republic: From the fall of the Berlin Wall to Berlusconi. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hadida, A. L. (2009). Motion picture performance: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(3), 297–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanretty, C. (2007). The gospel truths of Italian media bias. Comunicazione Politica, 1, 49–66.Google Scholar
  23. Hasted, N. (2008, January 18). A new wave of directors is rejecting realism – All thanks to the disastrous reign of Berlusconi. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/a-new-wave-of-directors-is-rejecting-realism-ndash-all-thanks-to-the-disastrous-reign-of-berlusconi-770980.html
  24. Jansen, C. (2005). The performance of German motion pictures, profits and subsidies: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Cultural Economics, 29(3), 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolker, R. P. (2009). The altering eye: Contemporary international cinema. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1991). The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1089–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall, D. (2012). Do rapporteurs receive independent expert policy advice? Indirect lobbying via the European Parliament’s committee secretariat. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(9), 1377–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKay, A. M. (2011). The decision to lobby bureaucrats. Public Choice, 147(1–2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McKenzie, J. (2012). The economics of movies: A literature survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(1), 42–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mecucci, G. (2007). L’assistenzialismo di sinistra ha affossato il cinema italiano. L’Occidentale, Orientamento quotidiano. http://www.mascellaro.it/node/15504
  31. Meldoni, G., Paolini, D., & Pulina, M. (2015). The great beauty: Public subsidies in the Italian Movie Industry. Italian Economic Journal, 1, 445–455.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-015-0021-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meloni, G., Paolini, D., & Pulina, M. (2018). State subsidies to film and their effects at the box office: Theorizing and measuring why some genres do better than others. In P. Murschetz, R. Teichmann, & M. Karmasin (Eds.), The handbook of state aid for film. Finance, industries and regulation. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, G. J. (1997). The impact of economics on contemporary political science. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1173–1204.Google Scholar
  34. Mitra, D. (1999). Endogenous lobby formation and endogenous protection: A long-run model of trade policy determination. American Economic Review, 89(5), 1116–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Netzer, D. (2006). Cultural policy: An American view. In V. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of arts and culture (pp. 1223–1251). Amsterdam: North Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Niskanen, W. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics, 18(2), 617–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olszewski, W., & Rosenthal, H. (2004). Politically determined income inequality and the provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 6(5), 707–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pinnock, A. (2006). Public value or intrinsic value? The arts-economic consequences of Mr Keynes. Public Money & Management, 26(3), 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pokorny, M., & Sedgwick, J. (2010). Profitability trends in Hollywood: 1929 to 1999. Economic History Review, 63(1), 56–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prat, A., & Strömberg, D. (2010). The political economy of mass media (CEPR Discussion Paper Series No. 8246). http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/cprceprdp/8246.htm
  41. Quaglia, L., & Radaelli, C. M. (2007). Italian politics and the European Union: A tale of two research designs. West European Politics, 30(4), 924–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sedgwick, J., & Pokorny, M. (1998). The risk environment of film-making: Warners in the inter-war period. Explorations in Economic History, 35, 196–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). On the economic role of the state. In A. Heertje (Ed.), The economic role of the state (pp. 9–85). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Towse, R. (2010). A textbook of cultural economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tullock, G. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  47. Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(3), 224–232.Google Scholar
  48. van der Ploeg, F. (2006). The making of cultural policy: A European perspective. In V. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of arts and culture (pp. 1183–1221). Amsterdam: North Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  50. Zerbe, R. O., Jr., & McCurdy, H. E. (1999). The failure of market failure. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18, 558–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  2. 2.Portsmouth Business School, University of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations