Advertisement

Feeding Gastrostomy Tubes

  • Brittany K. Bankhead-Kendall
  • Jayson Aydelotte
Chapter

Abstract

Oftentimes enteral feedings need to be transitioned from the nasogastric tube or orogastric tube to a gastrostomy tube. Feeding gastrostomy tubes are most often indicated when patients have a functional swallowing problem or have a structural anomaly that prevents safe, effective swallowing, most commonly head and neck tumors or cerebral dysfunction. This form of nutrition is often most suitable for patients who are physiologically or anatomically unable to swallow safely. This chapter addresses the indications for feeding gastrostomy tubes, techniques of placement, and potential complications.

Keywords

Enteral feeding Gastronomy tube Functional swallowing 

References

  1. 1.
    Lyon S, et al. Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy. Semin Interv Radiol. 2004;21(3):181–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norton B, et al. A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke. Br Med J. 1996;312(7022):13–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dennis M. FOOD: a multicentre randomised trial evaluation feeding policies in patients admitted to hospital with a recent stroke. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(2):iii–v, ix–x, 1–120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jinfeng W, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. J Radiat Res. 2014;55(3):559–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baker L, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of gastrostomy insertion techniques in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(5):718–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oliveira GP, et al. The role of surgical gastrostomy in the age of endoscopic gastrostomy: a 13 years and 543 patients retrospective study. Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas: organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva. 2016;108(12):776–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taghavi S, et al. Comparison of open gastrostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in lung transplant patients. Ann Med Surg. 2015;5:76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mizrahi I, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open approach to gastrostomy tubes. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2014;18(1):28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohler G, et al. Comparison of 231 patients receiving either “pull-through” or “push” percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(1):170–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tucker AT, et al. ‘Push’ versus ‘pull’ percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(11):1898–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galaski A, et al. Gastrostomy tube placement by radiological versus endoscopic methods in an acute care setting: a retrospective review of frequency, indications, complications, and outcomes. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009;23(2):109–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rahnemai-Azar A, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications, management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(24):7739–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fung E, et al. Incidence of abdominal wall metastases following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in patients with head and neck cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brittany K. Bankhead-Kendall
    • 1
  • Jayson Aydelotte
    • 2
  1. 1.Dell Medical School, University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery and Perioperative CareDell Medical School at the University of Texas-AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations