Advertisement

Biostatistics and Research Design for Clinicians

  • Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz
  • Alyssa Fitzpatrick Harlow
  • Adil H. Haider
Chapter

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to provide the reader with a basic understanding of core statistical concepts that will aid in the translation of meaningful research results. We emphasize the importance of a well-defined study design as a strong foundation that will lead to sound evidence. First, we define foundational statistical terminology; we then discuss the steps to generating and testing hypotheses through development of a solid research question and review how to choose an appropriate study design. Second, we describe a twofold approach to data analysis that uses descriptive statistics followed by inferential statistics. Finally, we cover essentials for sound evidence, based on a systematic point-based approach to judge the quality of data and strength of recommendations produced by research studies.

Keywords

Biostatistics Hypothesis Study design Descriptive statistics Inferential statistics 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Dr. Haider would like to thank the Career Development Course of the Association for Academic Surgery where he has lectured on this topic over the past several years. Most of the concepts presented here have been discussed during the course of these presentations.

References

  1. 1.
    Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biesecker LG. Hypothesis-generating research and predictive medicine. Genome Res. 2013;23(7):1051–3.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.157826.113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brian Haynes R. Forming research questions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(9):881–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Counsell C. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(5):380–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daniel WW, Cross CL. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 10th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, Lohr KN, Mulrow CD, Teutsch SM, Atkins D. Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(3 Supplement):21–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00261-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library. Study Design 101. Washington, DC: George Washington University. 2011. https://himmelfarb.gwu.edu/tutorials/studydesign101/. Retrieved 24 Mar 2017.
  8. 8.
    Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing clinical research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123(3):A12–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simianu VV, Farjah F, Flum DR. Evidence-based surgery: critically assessing surgical literature. In: Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. 20th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2013.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sullivan LM. Essentials of biostatistics in public health. 2nd ed. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    What is GRADE? BMJ Clinical Evidence. London. 2012. http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/x/set/static/ebm/learn/665072.html. Retrieved 29 Mar 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz
    • 1
  • Alyssa Fitzpatrick Harlow
    • 1
  • Adil H. Haider
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Surgery and Public Health (CSPH)Brigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations