Advertisement

Biomimetics pp 121-197 | Cite as

Strategies for Micropatterned, Nanopatterned, and Hierarchically Structured Lotus-like Surfaces

  • Bharat BhushanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Materials Science book series (SSMATERIALS, volume 279)

Abstract

It has been demonstrated experimentally that roughness changes contact angle (CA) in accordance with the Wenzel model or the Cassie-Baxter model, depending upon whether the surface is hydrophilic or hydrophobic (Bhushan and Jung 2011). Yost et al. (1995) found that roughness enhances wetting of a copper surface with Sn–Pb eutectic solder, which has a contact angle of 15°–20° for a smooth surface.

References

  1. Adamson, A. V. (1990), Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bartolo, D., Bouamrirene, F., Verneuil, E., Buguin, A., Silberzan, P., and Moulinet, S. (2006), “Bouncing or Sticky Droplets: Impalement Transitions on Superhydrophobic Micropatterned Surfaces,” Europhys. Lett. 74, 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhushan, B. (2003), “Adhesion and Stiction: Mechanisms, Measurement Techniques and Methods for Reduction,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 21, 2262–2296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhushan, B. (2013a), Principles and Applications of Tribology, second ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bhushan, B. (2013b), Introduction to Tribology, second ed., Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhushan, B. (2017a), Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology, fourth ed., Springer International, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  7. Bhushan, B. (2017b), Nanotribology and Nanomechanics – An Introduction, fourth ed., Springer International, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  8. Bhushan, B. and Blackman, G. S. (1991), “Atomic Force Microscopy of Magnetic Rigid Disks and Sliders and Its Applications to Tribology,” ASME J. Tribol. 113, 452–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhushan, B. and Jung, Y. C. (2006), “Micro and Nanoscale Characterization of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Leaf Surface,” Nanotechnology 17, 2758–2772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhushan, B. and Jung, Y. C. (2007), “Wetting Study of Patterned Surfaces for Superhydrophobicity,” Ultramicroscopy 107, 1033–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhushan, B., Nosonovsky M., and Jung, Y. C. (2007), “Towards Optimization of Patterned Superhydrophobic Surfaces” J. R. Soc. Interface 4, 643–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhushan, B. and Jung, Y. C. (2008), “Wetting, Adhesion and Friction of Superhydrophobic and Hydrophilic Leaves and Fabricated Micro/nanopatterned Surfaces,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 225010.Google Scholar
  13. Bhushan, B. and Jung, Y. C. (2011), “Natural and Biomimetic Artificial Surfaces for Superhydrophobicity, Self-Cleaning, Low Adhesion, and Drag Reduction,” Prog. Mater. Sci. 56, 1–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhushan, B., Hansford, D., and Lee, K. K. (2006), “Surface Modification of Silicon and Polydimethylsiloxane Surfaces with Vapor-Phase-Deposited Ultrathin Fluorosilane Films for Biomedical Nanodevices,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 24, 1197–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhushan, B., Koch, K., and Jung, Y. C. (2008a), “Nanostructures for Superhydrophobicity and Low Adhesion,” Soft Matter 4, 1799–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bhushan, B., Koch, K., and Jung, Y. C. (2008b), “Biomimetic Hierarchical Structure for Self-Cleaning,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 093101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bhushan, B., Jung, Y. C., and Koch, K. (2009a), “Self-Cleaning Efficiency of Artificial Superhydrophobic Surfaces,” Langmuir 25, 3240–3248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bhushan, B., Jung, Y. C., and Koch, K. (2009b), “Micro-, Nano- and Hierarchical Structures for Superhydrophobicity, Self-Cleaning and Low Adhesion,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 1631–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bhushan, B., Jung, Y. C., Niemietz, A., and Koch, K. (2009c), “Lotus-like Biomimetic Hierarchical Structures Developed by the Self-assembly of Tubular Plant Waxes,” Langmuir 25, 1659–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bhushan, B., Koch, K., and Jung, Y. C. (2009d), “Fabrication and Characterization of the Hierarchical Structure for Superhydrophobicity,” Ultramicroscopy 109, 1029–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bhushan, B., Jung, Y. C., and Nosonovsky, M. (2012), “Hierarchical Structures for Superhydrophobic Surfaces and Methods of Making,” U.S. Patent No. 8,137,751 B2, March 20.Google Scholar
  22. Bormashenko, E., Pogreb, R., Whyman, G., and Erlich, M. (2007), “Cassie-Wenzel Wetting Transition in Vibrated Drops Deposited on the Rough Surfaces: Is Dynamic Cassie-Wenzel Transition 2D or 1D Affair?” Langmuir 23, 6501–6503.Google Scholar
  23. Bourges-Monnier, C. and Shanahan, M. E. R. (1995), “Influence of Evaporation on Contact Angle,” Langmuir 11, 2820–2829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brugnara, M., Della Volpe, C., Siboni, S., and Zeni, D, (2006), “Contact Angle Analysis on Polymethylmethacrylate and Commercial Wax by Using an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope,” Scanning 28, 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bunshah, R. F. (1994), Handbook of Deposition Technologies for Films and Coatings: Science, Technology and Applications, Applied Science Publishers, Westwood, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  26. Burton, Z. and Bhushan, B. (2005), “Hydrophobicity, Adhesion, and Friction Properties of Nanopatterned Polymers and Scale Dependence for Micro- and Nanoelectromechanical Systems,” Nano Lett. 5, 1607–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Burton, Z. and Bhushan, B. (2006), “Surface Characterization and Adhesion and Friction Properties of Hydrophobic Leaf Surfaces,” Ultramicroscopy 106, 709–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Celestini, F. and Kofman, R. (2006), “Vibration of Submillimeter-size Supported Droplets,” Phys. Rev. E 73, 041602.Google Scholar
  29. Checco, A., Guenoun, P., and Daillant, J. (2003), “Nonlinear Dependence of the Contact Angle of Nanodroplets on Contact Line Curvatures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 186101.Google Scholar
  30. Chen, N. and Bhushan, B. (2006), “Atomic Force Microscopy Studies of Conditioner Thickness Distribution and Binding Interactions on the Hair Surface,” J. Microsc. 221, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen, Y. L., Helm, C. A., and Israelachvili, J. N. (1991), “Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Adhesion and Contact Angle Hysteresis of Monolayer Surfaces,” J. Phys. Chem. 95, 10736–10747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Choi, S. E., Yoo, P. J., Baek, S. J., Kim, T. W., and Lee, H. H. (2004), “An ultraviolet-curable mold for sub-100-nm lithography,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 7744–7745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Danilatos, G. D. and Brancik, J. V. (1986), “Observation of Liquid Transport in the ESEM,” Proc. 44th Annual Meeting Electron Microscopy Soc. of America (ed. G. W. Bailey), pp. 678–679, San Francisco Press, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  34. Dorset, D. L., Pangborn, W. A., and Hancock, A. J., (1983), “Epitaxial Crystallization of Alkane Chain Lipids for Electron Diffraction Analysis,” J. Biochem. Biophys. Meth. 8, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Erbil, H. Y., McHale, G., and Newton, M. I. (2002), “Drop Evaporation on Solid Surfaces: Constant Contact Angle Mode,” Langmuir 18, 2636–2641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Erbil, H. Y., Demirel, A. L., and Avci, Y. (2003), “Transformation of a Simple Plastic into a Superhydrophobic Surface,” Science 299, 1377–1380.Google Scholar
  37. Good, R. J. (1952), “A Thermodynamic Derivation of Wenzel’s Modification of Young’s Equation for Contact Angles; Together with a Theory of Hysteresis,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 5041–5042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Israelachvili, J. N. (1992), Intermolecular and Surface Forces, second edition, Academic Press, London, U. K.Google Scholar
  39. Joanny, J. F. and de Gennes, P. G. (1984), “A Model for Contact Angle Hysteresis,” J. Chem. Phys. 81, 552–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson, R. E. and Dettre, R. H. (1964), “Contact Angle Hysteresis,” Contact Angle, Wettability, and Adhesion, Adv. Chem. Ser. (ed. F. M. Fowkes), Vol. 43, pp. 112–135, American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  41. Jung, Y. C. and Bhushan, B. (2006), “Contact Angle, Adhesion, and Friction Properties of Micro- and Nanopatterned Polymers for Superhydrophobicity,” Nanotechnology 17, 4970–4980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jung, Y. C. and Bhushan, B. (2007), “Wetting Transition of Water Droplets on Superhydrophobic Patterned Surfaces,” Scripta Mater. 57, 1057–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jung, Y. C. and Bhushan, B. (2008a), “Wetting Behavior during Evaporation and Condensation of Water Microdroplets on Superhydrophobic Patterned Surfaces” J. Micros. 229, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jung, Y. C. and Bhushan, B. (2008b), “Dynamic Effects of Bouncing Water Droplets on Superhydrophobic Surfaces,” Langmuir 24, 6262–6269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jung, Y. C. and Bhushan, B. (2008c), “Technique to Measure Contact Angle of Micro/Nanodroplets using Atomic Force Microscopy,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 26, 777–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jung, Y. C. and Bhushan, B. (2009), “Dynamic Effects Induced Transition of Droplets on Biomimetic Superhydrophobic Surfaces,” Langmuir 25, 9208–9218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jung, Y. C. and Bhushan, B. (2010), “Biomimetic Structures for Fluid Drag Reduction in Laminar and Turbulent Flows,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 035104.Google Scholar
  48. Kasai, T., Bhushan, B., Kulik, G., Barbieri, L., and Hoffmann, P. (2005), “Micro/Nanotribological Study of Perfluorosilane SAMs for Antistiction and Low Wear,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 23, 995–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Koch, K., Dommisse, A., and Barthlott, W. (2006a), “Chemistry and Crystal Growth of Plant Wax Tubules of Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) and Nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus) Leaves on Technical Substrates,” Crystl. Growth Des. 6, 2571–2578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Koch, K., Barthlott, W., Koch, S., Hommes, A., Wandelt, K., Mamdouh, W., De-Feyter, S. and Broekmann, P. (2006b), “Structural Analysis of Wheat Wax (Triticum aestivum, c.v. ‘Naturastar’ L.): from the Molecular Level to Three Dimensional Crystals,” Planta 223, 258–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Koch, K., Dommisse, A., Barthlott, W., and Gorb, S. (2007), “The Use of Plant Waxes as Templates for Micro- and Nanopatterning of Surfaces,” Acta Biomat. 3, 905–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Koch, K., Schulte, A. J., Fischer, A., Gorb, S. N., and Barthlott, W. (2008), “A Fast and Low-cost Replication Technique for Nano- and High-Aspect-Ratio Structures of Biological and Artificial Materials,” Bioinsp. Biomim. 3, 046002.Google Scholar
  53. Koch, K., Bhushan, B., Jung, Y. C., and Barthlott, W. (2009), “Fabrication of Artificial Lotus Leaves and Significance of Hierarchical Structure for Superhydrophobicity and Low Adhesion,” Soft Matter 5, 1386–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lafuma, A. and Quéré, D. (2003), “Superhydrophobic States,” Nat. Mater. 2, 457–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lamb, H. (1932), Hydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  56. Lee, S. -W. and Laibinis, P. E. (2000), “Directed Movement of Liquids on Patterned Surfaces Using Noncovalent Molecular Adsorption,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 5395–5396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lodge, R. A. and Bhushan, B. (2006), “Surface Characterization of Human Hair using Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy and Measurement of Conditioner Thickness Distribution,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 24, 1258–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McHale, G., Aqil, S., Shirtcliffe, N. J., Newton, M. I., and Erbil, H. Y. (2005), “Analysis of Droplet Evaporation on a Superhydrophobic Surface,” Langmuir 21, 11053–11060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Neinhuis, C., and Barthlott, W. (1997), “Characterization and Distribution of Water-Repellent, Self-Cleaning Plant Surfaces,” Annals of Botany 79, 667–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Niemietz, A., Wandelt, K., Barthlott, W., and Koch, K. (2009), “Thermal Evaporation of Multi-Component Waxes and Thermally Activated Formation of Nano-Tubules for Superhydrophobic Surfaces,” Prog. Org. Coat. 66, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Noblin, X., Buguin, A., and Brochard-Wyart, F. (2004), “Vibrated Sessile Drops: Transition between Pinned and Mobile Contact Line Oscillations,” Eur. Phys. J. E 14. 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B. (2005), “Roughness Optimization for Biomimetic Superhydrophobic Surfaces,” Microsyst. Technol. 11, 535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B. (2007a), “Multiscale Friction Mechanisms and Hierarchical Surfaces in Nano- and Bio-Tribology,” Mater. Sci. Eng.:R 58, 162–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B. (2007b), “Hierarchical Roughness Makes Superhydrophobic Surfaces Stable,” Microelectronic Eng. 84, 382–386.Google Scholar
  65. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B. (2007c), “Biomimetic Superhydrophobic Surfaces: Multiscale Approach,” Nano Lett. 7, 2633–2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B. (2007d), “Hierarchical Roughness Optimization for Biomimetic Superhydrophobic Surfaces,” Ultramicroscopy 107, 969–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B. (2008a), Multiscale Dissipative Mechanisms and Hierarchical Surfaces: Friction, Superhydrophobicity, and Biomimetics, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B. (2008b), “Roughness-Induced Superhydrophobicity: A Way to Design Non-Adhesive Surfaces,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 225009.Google Scholar
  69. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B. (2008c), “Patterned Non-Adhesive Surfaces: Superhydrophobicity and Wetting Regime Transitions,” Langmuir 24, 1525–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B. (2008d), “Capillary Effects and Instabilities in Nanocontacts,” Ultramicroscopy 108, 1181–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B. (2008e), “Energy Transitions in Superhydrophobicity: Low Adhesion, Easy Flow and Bouncing,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 395005.Google Scholar
  72. Palacio, M. and Bhushan, B. (2010), “Normal and Lateral Force Calibration Techniques for AFM Cantilevers,” Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 35, 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pompe, T. and Herminghaus, S. (2000), “Three-Phase Contact Line Energetics from Nanoscale Liquid Surface Topographies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1930–1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Quere, D. (2004), “Surface Wetting Model Droplets,” Nat. Mater. 3, 79–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Reyssat, M., Pepin, A., Marty, F., Chen, Y., and Quere, D. (2006), “Bouncing Transitions on Microtextured Materials,” Europhys. Lett. 74, 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Richard, D., Clanet, C., and Quere, D. (2002), “Contact Time of a Bouncing Drop,” Nature 417, 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rowan, S. M., Newton, M. I., and McHale, G. (1995), “Evaporation of Microdroplets and the Wetting of Solid Surfaces,” J. Phys. Chem. 99, 13268–13271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Semal, S., Blake, T. D., Geskin, V., de Ruijter, M. L., Castelein, G., and De Coninck, J. (1999), “Influence of Surface Roughness on Wetting Dynamics,” Langmuir 15, 8765–8770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shibuichi, S., Onda, T., Satoh, N., and Tsujii, K. (1996), “Super-Water-Repellent Surfaces Resulting from Fractal Structure,” J. Phys. Chem. 100, 19512–19517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stelmashenko, N. A., Craven, J. P., Donald, A. M., Terentjev, E. M., and Thiel, B. L. (2001), “Topographic Contrast of Partially Wetting Water Droplets in Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy,” J. Micros. 204, 172–183.Google Scholar
  81. van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Bruijnzeel, L. A., and Rosewell, C. J. (2002), “Rainfall Intensity–Kinetic Energy Relationships: A Critical Literature Appraisal,” J. Hydrology 261, 1–23.Google Scholar
  82. Yost, F. G., Michael, J. R., and Eisenmann, E. T. (1995), “Extensive Wetting Due to Roughness,” Acta Metall. Mater. 45, 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhang, X., Tan, S., Zhao, N., Guo, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., and Xu, J. (2006), “Evaporation of Sessile Water Droplets on Superhydrophobic Natural Lotus and Biomimetic Polymer Surfaces,” Chem. Phys. Chem. 7, 2067–2070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanoprobe Laboratory for Bio/Nanotechnology and Biomimetics (NLBB)The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations