Biomimetics pp 491-562 | Cite as

Shark Skin Surface for Fluid-Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flow

  • Bharat BhushanEmail author
Part of the Springer Series in Materials Science book series (SSMATERIALS, volume 279)


Nature has created ways of reducing drag in fluid flow, evident in the efficient movement of fish, dolphins, and sharks. The mucus secreted by fish reduces drag as they move through water, protects the fish from abrasion by making the fish slide across objects rather than scrape, and prevents disease by making the surface of the fish difficult for microscopic organisms to adhere to, minimizing biofouling (Shephard in Rev Fish Biol Fish 4:401–429, 1994). Applications of drag reducing polymers has been long known.


  1. Anderson, J.D. (2010), Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, fifth ed., McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1952), Marine Fouling and its Prevention, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, US Naval Institute, Annapolis, US.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2007), Pilot’s Encyclopedia of Aeronautical Knowledge, United States Federal Aviation Administration, Skyhorse, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous (2012), International Maritime Organization, Maritime Knowledge Centre, International Shipping Facts and Figures – Information Resources on Trade, Safety, Security, and Environment Retrieved from <> 2012
  5. Anonymous (2016a) ANSYS® Fluent, Release 16.0, Help System, Fluent User’s Guide, ANSYS, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous (2016b) U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, October 2015 U. S. Airline Traffic Data, Press Release: BTS04-16 Retrieved from <> 2016
  7. Anonymous (2016c) U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety. Annual Report Summary Retrieved from> 2016.
  8. Barlow, J. B., Rae, W. H., and Pope, A. (1999), Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, third ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Batchelor, G. K. (1970), An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U. K.Google Scholar
  10. Bechert, D. W., Hoppe, G. and Reif, W. E. (1985), “On the Drag Reduction of the Shark Skin,” Paper # AIAA-85-0546, presented at AIAA Shear Flow Control Conference, Boulder, CO, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Bechert, D. W., Bartenwerfer, M., Hoppe, G., and Reif, W.-E. (1986), “Drag Reduction Mechanisms Derived from Shark Skin,” Paper # ICAS-86-1.8.3, Vol. 2 (A86-48-97624-01), pp. 1044-1068, Proc. 15th ICAS Congress, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Bechert, D. W., Hoppe, G., van der Hoeven, J. G. T. and Makris, R. (1992), “The Berlin Oil Channel for Drag Reduction Research,” Exp. in Fluids 12, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bechert, D. W., Bruse, M., Hage, W., and Meyer, R. (1997a), “Biological Surfaces and Their Technological Application – Laboratory and Flight Experiments on Drag Reduction and Separation Control,” Paper # AIAA-1997-1960, presented at AIAA 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass Village, CO, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Bechert, D. W., Bruse, M., Hage, W., van der Hoeven, J. G. T. and Hoppe, G. (1997b), “Experiments on Drag Reducing Surfaces and their Optimization with an Adjustable Geometry,” J. Fluid Mech. 338, 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bechert, D. W., Bruse, M. and Hage, W. (2000a), “Experiments with Three-dimensional Riblets as an Idealized Model of Shark Skin,” Exp. Fluids 28, 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bechert, D. W., Bruse, M., Hage, W. and Meyer, R. (2000b), “Fluid Mechanics of Biological Surfaces and their Technological Application,” Naturwissenschaften 87, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bhushan, B. (2009), “Biomimetics: Lessons from Nature – an Overview,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 367, 1445–1486.Google Scholar
  18. Bhushan, B. (2012), “Bioinspired Structured Surfaces,” Langmuir 28, 1698–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bhushan, B. and Caspers, M. (2017) “An Overview of Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) for Microfabrication,” Microsyst. Technol. 23, 1117–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bhushan, B. and Jung, Y.C. (2011), “Natural and Biomimetic Artificial Surfaces for Superhydrophobicity, Self-Cleaning, Low Adhesion, and Drag Reduction,” Prog. Mater. Sci. 56, 1–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bixler, G. D. and Bhushan, B. (2012a), “Biofouling Lessons from Nature,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 370, 2381–2417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bixler, G. D. and Bhushan, B. (2012b), “‘Bioinspired Rice Leaf and Butterfly Wing Surface Structures Combining Shark Skin and Lotus Effects,” Soft Matter 8, 11271–11284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bixler, G. D. and Bhushan, B. (2013a), “Fluid Drag Reduction with Shark-skin Riblet Inspired Microstructured Surfaces,” Adv. Func. Mater. 23, 4507–4528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bixler, G. D. and Bhushan, B. (2013b), “Shark Skin Inspired Low-drag Microstructured Surfaces in Closed Channel Flow,” J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 393, 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bixler, G. D. and Bhushan, B. (2013c), “Bioinspired Micro/Nanostructured Surfaces for Oil Drag Reduction in Closed Channel Flow,” Soft Matter 9, 1620–1635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bixler, G. D. and Bhushan, B. (2013d), “Fluid Drag Reduction and Efficient Self-Cleaning with Rice Leaf and Butterfly Wing Bioinspired Surfaces,” Nanoscale 5, 7685–7710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Blevins, R. D. (1984), Applied Fluid Dynamics Handbook, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Brennan, A. B., Baney, R. H., Carman, M. I., Estes, T. G., Feinberg, A. W., Wilson, L. H. and Schumacher, J. F.. (2010), “Surface Topographies for Non-Toxic Bioadhesion Control,” U. S. Patent no. 7,650,848 B2, Jan. 26.Google Scholar
  29. Brostow, W. (2008), “Drag Reduction in Flow: Review of Applications, Mechanism, and Prediction,” J. Indust and Eng Chem 14, 408–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Burger, E. D., Munk, W. R. and Wahl, H. A. (1982), “Flow Increase in the Trans Alaska Pipeline Through Use of a Polymeric Drag-Reducing Additive,” J. Petro Tech, 34, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Buttner, C. C. and Schulz, U. (2011), “Shark Skin Inspired Riblet Structures as Aerodynamically Optimized High Temperature Coatings for Blades of Aeroengines,” Smart Matl. and Struct. 20, 1–9.Google Scholar
  32. Caram, J. M. and Ahmed, A. (1991), “Effect of Riblets on Turbulence in the Wake of an Airfoil,” AIAA 29, 1769–1770.Google Scholar
  33. Caram, J. M. and Ahmed, A. (1992), “Development of the Wake of an Airfoil with Riblets,” AIAA 30, 2817–2818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chan, J. and Wong, S. (eds.) (2010), Biofouling Types, Impact and Anti-Fouling, Nova Science Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Choi, K. S., Gadd, G. E., Pearcey, H. H., Savill, A. M., and Svensson, S. (1989), “Tests of Drag-Reducing Polymer Coated on a Riblet Surface,” Appl. Sci. Res. 46, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Choi, H., Moin, P. and Kim, J. (1993), “Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow Over Riblets,” J. Fluid Mech. 255, 503–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Choi, K. S., Yang, X., Clayton, B. R., Glover, E. J., Altar, M., Semenov, B. N., and Kulik, V. M. (1997), “Turbulent Drag Reduction Using Compliant Surfaces,” Proc. R. Soc A 453, 2229–2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Chu, D. C. and Karniadakis, G. E. (1993), “A Direct Numerical Simulation of Laminar and Turbulent Flow Over Riblet-mounted Surfaces,” J. Fluid Mech. 250, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Collins, M. W. and Brebbia, C. A. (eds.) (2004), Design and Nature II Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering, WIT Press, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
  40. Copisarow, M. (1945), “Marine Fouling and its Prevention,” Science 101, 406–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Coustols, E. (1989), “Behavior of Internal Manipulators: “Riblet” Models in Subsonic and Transonic Flows,” Paper # AIAA-89-0963, presented at AIAA Shear Flow Conference, Tempe, AZ, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Coustols, E. and Cousteix, J. (1994), “Performances of Riblets in the Supersonic Regime,” AIAA 32, 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Coustols, E. and Schmitt, V. (1990), “Synthesis of Experimental Riblet Studies in Transonic Conditions,” in Turbulence Control by Passive Means (ed. E. Coustols), pp. 123–140, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Daniello, R. J., Waterhouse, N. E. and Rothstein, J. P. (2009), “Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flows over Superhydrophobic Surfaces,” Phys. Fluids 21, 085103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Davies, M. (ed.) (2002), Standard Handbook for Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Dean, B. and Bhushan, B. (2010), “Shark-skin Surfaces for Fluid-Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flow: a Review,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 368, 4775–4806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Dean, B. and Bhushan, B. (2012), “The Effect of Riblets in Rectangular Duct Flow,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 3936–3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Denkena, B., Kohler, J. and Wang, B. (2010), “Manufacturing of Functional Riblet Structures by Profile Grinding,” CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Tech. 3, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Deyuan, Z., Yuehao, L., Huawei, C. and Xinggang, J. (2011), “Exploring Drag-Reducing Grooved Internal Coating for Gas Pipelines,” Pipeline & Gas Journal 238, 59–60.Google Scholar
  50. Dickinson, P. H. and Proudley, G. M. (1991), “Methods of Manufacture and Surface Treatment Using Laser Radiation,” U. S. Patent no. 4,994,639, Feb. 19.Google Scholar
  51. El-Samni, O. A., Chun, H. H. and Yoon, H. S. (2007), “Drag Reduction of Turbulent Flow Over Thin Rectangular Riblets,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. 45, 436–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Enyutin, G. V., Lashkov, Y. A., and Samoilova, N. V. (1995), “Drag Reduction in Riblet-Lined Pipes,” Fluid Dynamics, 30, 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Frings, B. (1988), “Heterogeneous Drag Reduction in Turbulent Pipe Flows using Various Injection Techniques,” Rheologica Acta 27, 92–110.Google Scholar
  54. Gillcrist, M. C. and Reidy, L. W. (1989), “Drag Measurements on Marine Vehicles with a Riblet Surface Coating,” in Drag Reduction in Fluid Flows: Techniques for Friction Control (eds. R. H. J. Sellin and R.T. Moses), pp. 99–106, Ellis Horwood Publishers, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  55. Goldstein, D., Handler, R. and Sirovich, L. (1995), “Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow Over a Modelled Riblet-covered Surface,” J. Fluid Mech. 302, 333–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Gruneberger, R. and Hage, W. (2011), “Drag Characteristics of Longitudinal and Transverse Riblets at Low Dimensionless Spacings,” Exp. Fluids, 50, 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Han, M., Huh, J. K., Lee, S. S., and Lee, S. (2002), “Micro-Riblet Film for Drag Reduction,” Proceedings of the Pacific Rim Workshop on Transducers and Micro/Nano Technologies, Xiamen, China.Google Scholar
  58. Han, M., Lim, H. C., Jang, Y.-G., Seung, S. L., and Lee, S.-J. (2003), “Fabrication of a Micro-Riblet Film and Drag Reduction Effects on Curved Objects,” Paper # 0–7803-7731-1, presented at 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  59. Hirt, G. and Thome, M. (2007), “Large Area Rolling of Functional Metallic Micro Structures,” Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 1, 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hoyt, J. W. (1975), “Hydrodynamic Drag Reduction Due to Fish Slimes,” in Swimming and Flying in Nature (ed. T. Y. T. Wu), Vol. 2, pp. 653–672.Google Scholar
  61. Jimenez, J. and Moin, P. (1991), “The Minimal Flow Unit in Near-wall Turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech. 225, 213–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jung, Y. C. and Bhushan, B. (2010), “Biomimetic Structures for Fluid Drag Reduction in Laminar and Turbulent Flows,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 1–9.Google Scholar
  63. Kennedy, J. L. (1993), Oil and Gas Pipeline Fundamentals, PennWell Books, Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  64. Kesel, A. and Liedert, R. (2007), “Learning from Nature: Non-Toxic Biofouling Control by Shark Skin Effect,” Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 146, S130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. and Runstadler, P. W. (1967), “The Structure of Turbulent Boundary Layers.” J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Koch, K. and Barthlott, W. (2009), “Superhydrophobic and Superhydrophilic Plant Surfaces: an Inspiration for Biomimetic Materials,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 367, 1487–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Koury, E. and Virk P. S. (1995), “Drag Reduction by Polymer Solutions in a Riblet-Lined Pipe,” Appl. Sci. Res. 54, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Krieger, K. (2004), “Do Pool Sharks Really Swim Faster?” Science 305, 636–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lee, S. J. and Lee, S. H. (2001), “Flow Field Analysis of a Turbulent Boundary Layer over a Riblet Surface,” Exp. Fluids 30, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lee, J. D., Gregorek, G. M., and Korkan, K. D. (1978), “Testing Techniques and Interference Evaluation in the OSU Transonic Airfoil Facility,” Paper # AIAA-1978-1118, presented at 11th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Seattle, WA, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  71. Liu, K. N., Christodoulou, C., Riccius, O. and Joesph, D. D. (1990), “Drag Reduction in Pipes Lined with Riblets,” AIAA 28, 1697–1698.Google Scholar
  72. Lowrey, P. and Harasha, J. (1991), “A Preliminary Assessment of the Feasibility of using Riblets in Internal Flows to Conserve Energy,” Energy 16, 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Luchini, P., Manzo, F., and Pozzi, A. (1991), “Resistance of a Grooved Surface to Parallel Flow and Cross-flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 228, 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Marentic, F. J. and Morris, T. L. (1992), “Drag Reduction Article,” U. S. Patent no. 5,133,516, Jul. 28.Google Scholar
  75. Martell, M. B., Perot, J. B., and Rothstein, J. P. (2009), “Direct Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Flows over Drag-reducing Ultrahydrophobic Surfaces,” J. Fluid Mech. 620, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Martell, M. B., Rothstein, J. P. and Perot, J. B. (2010), “An Analysis of Superhydrophobic Turbulent Drag Reduction Mechanisms using Direct Numerical Simulation,” Phys. Fluids 22, 065102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Martin, S. and Bhushan, B. (2014), “Fluid Flow Analysis of a Shark-Inspired Microstructure,” J. Fluid Mech. 756, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Martin, S. and Bhushan, B. (2016a), “Fluid Flow Analysis of Continuous and Segmented Riblet Structures,” RSC Adv. 6, 10962–10978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Martin, S. and Bhushan, B. (2016b), “Modeling and Optimization of Shark-inspired Riblet Geometries for Low Drag Application,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 474, 206–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Martínez-Palou, R., Mosqueira, M., Zapata-Rendón, B., Mar-Juárez, E., Bernal-Huicochea, C., Clavel-López, J. and Aburto, J. (2011), “Transportation of Heavy and Extra-heavy Crude Oil by Pipeline: A review,” J. Petrol. Sci. Eng, 75, 274–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Melo, L. F., Bott, T. R. and Bernardo, C. A. (eds.) (1988), Fouling Science and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  82. Munson, B. R., Rothmayer, A. P., Okiishi, T. M., and Huebsch, W. D. (2012), Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, seventh ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  83. Neumann, D. and Dinkelacker, A. (1991), “Drag Measurements on V-grooved Surfaces on a Body of Revolution in Axial Flow,” App Sci Res 48, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nitschke, P. (1984), “Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Flow in Smooth and Longitudinal Grooved Pipes,” NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N88.Google Scholar
  85. Oeffner, J. and Lauder, G. V. (2012), “The Hydrodynamic Function of Shark Skin and Two Biomimetic Applications,” J. Exp. Biology 215, 785–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ou, J., Perot, B. and Rothstein, J. P. (2004), “Laminar Drag Reduction in Microchannels using Ultrahydrophobic Surfaces,” Phys. Fluids 16, 4635–4643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pritchard, P. J. and Mitchell, J. W. (2015), Fox and McDonald’s Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, ninth ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  88. Railkin, A. I. (2004), Marine Biofouling Colonization Processes and Defenses, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  89. Ralston, E. and Swain, G. (2009), “Bioinspiration – the Solution for Biofouling Control?” Bioinsp. Biomim. 4, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ray, D. L. (ed.) (1959), Marine Boring and Fouling Organisms, University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  91. Reidy, L. W. and Anderson, G. W. (1988), “Drag Reduction for External and Internal Boundary Layers Using Riblets and Polymers,” Paper # AIAA-1988-0138, presented at 26th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  92. Reif, W. (1985), Squamation and Ecology of Sharks, Vol. 78, pp. 1–255, Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
  93. Rohr, J. J., Andersen, G. W., Reidy, L. W. and Hendricks, E. W. (1992), “A Comparison of the Drag-reducing Benefits of Riblets in Internal and External Flows,” Exp. in Fluids, 13, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sareen, A., Deters, R. W., Henry, S. P. and Selig, M. S. (2011), “Drag Reduction Using Riblet Film Applied to Airfoils for Wind Turbines,” Paper # AIAA-2011-558, presented at 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  95. Scardino, A. J. (2009), “Surface Modification Approaches to Control Marine Biofouling,” in Advances in Marine Antifouling Coatings and Technologies (eds. C. Hellio and D. Yebra), pp. 664–692, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Schulz, M. J., Shanov, V. N. and Yun, Y. (eds.) (2009), Nanomedicine Design of Particles, Sensors, Motors, Implants, Robots, and Devices, Artech House, Boston.Google Scholar
  97. Schumacher, J. F., Aldred, N., Callow, M. E., Finlay, J. A., Callow, J. A., Clare, A. S. and Brennan, A. B. (2007), “Species-Specific Engineered Antifouling Topographies: Correlations between the Settlement of Algal Zoospores and Barnacle Cyprids,” Biofouling 23, 307– 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Shephard, K. L. (1994), “Functions for Fish Mucus,” Rev. Fish Biology and Fisheries 4, 401–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Shirtliff, M. and Leid, J. G. (eds.) (2009), The Role of Biofilms in Device-Related Infections, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  100. Somerscales, E. F. C. and Knudsen, J. G. (eds.) (1981), Fouling of Heat Transfer Equipment, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  101. Subaschandar, N., Kumar, R., and Sundaram, S. (1999), “Drag Reduction Due to Riblets on a GAW(2) Airfoil,” J. of Aircraft, 36, 890–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sundaram, S., Viswanath, P. R., and Rudrakumar, S. (1996), “Viscous Drag Reduction Using Riblets on NACA 0012 Airfoil to Moderate Incidence,” AIAA 34, 676–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sundaram, S., Viswanath, P. R., and Subaschandar, N. (1999), “Viscous Drag Reduction Using Riblets on a Swept Wing,” AIAA 37, 851–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Viswanath, P. R. (1999), “Riblets on Airfoil and Wings: A Review,” Paper # AIAA-99-3402, presented at the AIAA 30th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, VA, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  105. Viswanath, P. R. and Mukund, R. (1995), “Turbulent Drag Reduction Using Riblets on a Supercritical Airfoil at Transonic Speeds,” AIAA 33, 945–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Viswanath, P. R. (2002), “Aircraft Viscous Drag Reduction using Riblets,” Prog Aerospace Sci, 38, 571–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Vo-Dinh, T. (ed.) (2007), Nanotechnology in Biology and Medicine, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  108. Walker, J., Surman, S. and Jass, J. (eds.) (2000), Industrial Biofouling Detection, Prevention and Control, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  109. Walsh, M. J. (1982), “Turbulent Boundary Layer Drag Reduction using Riblets,” Paper # AIAA-1982-0169, presented at AIAA 20th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando FL, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  110. Walsh, M. J. (1990a), “Effect of Detailed Surface Geometry on Riblet Drag Reduction Performance,” J. Aircraft, 27, 572–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Walsh, M. J. (1990b), “Riblets. Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers,” Progr. in Astronaut. and Aeronaut., 123, 203–261.Google Scholar
  112. Walsh, M. J. and Lindemann, A. M. (1984), “Optimization and Application of Riblets for Turbulent Drag Reduction,” Paper # AIAA-1984-0347, presented at AIAA 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  113. Walsh, M. J. and Anders, J. B., Jr. (1989), “Riblet/LEBU Research at NASA Langley,” Appl. Sci. Res. 46, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Weiss, M. H. (1997), “Implementation of Drag Reduction Techniques in Natural Gas Pipelines,” presented at 10th European Drag Reduction Working Meeting, Berlin, Germany, March 19–21.Google Scholar
  115. Wen, L., Weaver, J. C., and Lauder, G. V. (2014), “Biomimetic Shark Skin: Design, Fabrication, and Hydrodynamic Function,” J. Exp. Biology 217, 1656–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wetzel, K. K. and Farokhi, S. (1996), “Interaction of Riblets and Vortex Generators on an Airfoil,” Paper # AIAA-1996-2428-CP, presented at the AIAA 14th Applied Aero-dynamics Conference, New Orleans, LA, AIAA, New York.Google Scholar
  117. White, F. (2006), Viscous Fluid Flow, third ed., McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  118. Wilkinson, S. P. and Lazos, B. S. (1988), “Direct Drag and Hot-wire Measurements on Thin-element Riblet Arrays,” in Turbulence Management and Relaminarisation (eds. H. W. Liepmann and R. Narasimha), pp. 121–131, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanoprobe Laboratory for Bio/Nanotechnology and Biomimetics (NLBB)The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations