Skip to main content

Endgames and Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Why Paramilitary Operations Fail
  • 259 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter looks at the score sheet for U.S. government proxy wars, indicating that 8 out of 25 of them can be counted as successes in the sense of proxies achieving military victory. In half of these successes, a more direct U.S. military intervention was necessary to secure the desired outcome. The chapter discusses causes of success and failure and argues that even the successes were highly problematic with respect to bringing into power incompetent and corrupted governments. Covert intervention resulted in the emergence of brutal dictatorships, criminal states, and regions of permanent political instability. PMOs are usually half-hearted measures that are often incapable of changing the outcomes of conflicts and that are often setting up countries for future malaise even when they are successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Shapiro makes this point with respect to the problem of terrorist organizations to recruit members: the pool of suitable members tends to be very small and terrorist leaders do not know who will make a good terrorist in the long term at the stage of recruitment. See Shapiro 2013, 112.

  2. 2.

    Daniel Lake has argued that it was neither the air campaign nor NATO’s threat of using ground forces or the KLA that resulted in Milosevic giving in, but rather Serbian vulnerability to economic warfare and political pressure that had destabilized the regime. See Lake 2009.

  3. 3.

    According to Riedel, ‘The Pakistanis came to refer to that period as the golden age in US-Pakistani cooperation, when “Reagan rules” were used, meaning that the CIA gave the ISI money and arms and asked no questions about what the ISI did with them. This is a bit of an exaggeration, but not by much.’ See Riedel 2014, 147.

  4. 4.

    Bruce Riedel defended the use of Pakistan by questioning ‘whether the United States had any viable policy alternatives to Pakistan or whether US influence could have altered Pakistan’s strategy,’ suggesting that there was no alternative to Pakistan and that Washington could exercise very little influence on Pakistan, nor were any efforts made in this respect by the Reagan administration. See Riedel 2014, 146–147.

  5. 5.

    It is often pointed out that the Taliban were just hoarding the opium to drive up the prices so that they could cash out at a later point.

References

  • Arntson, Edward L. 2014. “The Soviet Withdrawal from Afghanistan: Three Key Decisions that Shaped the 40th Army Operational Withdrawal Plan.” School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, David. 2009. “Extremist Group Announces Split from Al Qaeda.” The Telegraph, 9 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, William. 2000. Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower. Monroe: Common Courage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BND. 2005. “Kosovo: BND Analyse vom 22.02.2005.” WikiLeaks.org. https://wikileaks.org/wiki/BND_Kosovo_intelligence_report,_22_Feb_2005.

  • Brady, Sheelagh. 2012. “Organised Crime in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Silent War Fought by an Ambush of Toothless Tigers or a War Not Yet Fought?” (October). https://www.occrp.org/documents/OC_in_BH_ENG.pdf.

  • Bunker, Robert, and Bunker, Pamela. 2006. “Defining Criminal States.” Global Crime 7 (3–4): 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1990. “Who Really Won in Nicaragua.” Boston Globe, 4 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilluffo, Frank, and Salmoiraghi, George. 1999. “And the Winner Is…the Albanian Mafia.” Washington Quarterly 22 (4): 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, Steve. 1992. “In CIA’s Covert War, Where to Draw a Line Was Key.” Washington Post, 20 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, John. 2002. Unholy Wars: Afghanistan, America and International Terrorism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crile, George. 2003. My Enemy’s Enemy: The Story of the Largest Covert Operation in History: The Arming of the Mujahideen by the CIA. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullather, Nick. 2006. Secret History: The CIA’s Classified Account of Its Operations in Guatemala, 1952–1954. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deliso, Christopher. 2007. The Coming Balkans Caliphate: The Threat of Radical Islam to Europe and the West. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, Tom. 2015. “How Much Does It Cost to Liberate a Country.” The Nation, 12 November. https://www.thenation.com/article/how-much-does-it-cost-to-liberate-a-country/.

  • Gagnon, Lysiane. 2011. “Islamist Stripes Are No Surprise.” The Globe and Mail, 31 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, Carlotta. 2006. “Another Year of Drug War, and the Poppy Crop Flourishes.” New York Times, 17 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerges, Fawaz A. 2016. “Syria War: Tide Turns Assad’s Way Amid Ceasefire Push.” BBC Online, 13 February. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35562943.

  • Gleijeses, Piero. 2016. “The CIA’s Paramilitary Operations During the Cold War: An Assessment.” Cold War History, 13 May: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groh, Tyrone. 2010. “War on the Cheap? Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Proxy War.” PhD diss., Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Robert. 2003. Comrades: The Rise and Fall of World Communism. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Geraint. 2014. My Enemy’s Enemy: Proxy Warfare in International Politics. Eastbourne, UK: Sussex Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immerman, Richard H. 1997. The CIA in Guatemala: The Foreign Policy of Intervention. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Franziska. 1987. “Habré’s Hour of Glory.” Africa Report 32 (5): 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, William. 1977. “Choice of Compulsory Insurance Schemes Under Adverse Selection.” Public Choice 31 (Fall): 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judah, Tim. 2014. “Bosnian Protests: A Balkan Spring?” BBC Online, 7 February. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26093160.

  • Klebnikov, Peter. 2000. “Heroin Heroes.” Mother Jones (January/ February). http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2000/01/heroin-heroes/.

  • Knaus, John Kenneth. 1999. Orphans of the Cold War: America and the Tibetan Struggle for Survival. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurlantzick, Joshua. 2016. A Great Place to Have a War: America in Laos and the Birth of a Military CIA. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, Daniel. 2009. ‘The Limits of Coercive Airpower: NATO’s “Victory” in Kosovo Revisited.’ International Security 34 (1): 83–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullum, Bill. 1989. “The CIA Has Bungled It.” Washington Post, 10 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. 2013. ‘“Ghost Money,” and Lots of It.’ New York Times, 30 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordland, Rod. 2010. “U.S. Turns a Blind Eye to Opium in Afghan Town.” New York Times, 20 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettifer, James. 1997. “The Rise of the Kleptocracy.” World Today 53 (1): 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prados, John. 2006. Safe for Democracy: The Secret Wars of the CIA. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, Ahmed. 2009. Descent Into Chaos: The U.S. and the Disaster in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Central Asia. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauchhaus, Robert W. 2009. “Principal-Agent Problems in Humanitarian Intervention, Moral Hazards, Adverse Selection, and the Commitment Dilemma.” International Studies Quarterly 53 (4): 871–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, Bruce. 2014. What We Won: America’s Secret War in Afghanistan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RT. 2017. “Hamid Karzai Special: Former President of Afghanistan on the Legacy of US Intervention.” RT.com, 4 October. https://www.rt.com/shows/going-underground/405631-hamid-karzai-afghanistan-us/.

  • Schindler, John. 2007. Unholy Terror: Bosnia, Al Qaeda, and the Rise of Global Jihad. St. Paul: Zenith Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Peter Dale. 2010. American War Machine: Deep Politics, the CIA Global Drug Connection, and the Road to Afghanistan. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serwer, Daniel. 2015. “Contingency Planning Memo Update: Libya’s Escalating Civil War.” Council on Foreign Relations, June. https://files.cfr.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2015/06/CPM_Update_Libya.pdf.

  • Shapiro, Jacob N. 2013. The Terrorist’s Dilemma: Managing Violent Covert Organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, James. 2011. “10 Myths About Afghanistan.” The Guardian, 27 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Comments. 2015. “Libya’s Fragmented Conflict Resists Solution.” Strategic Comments 21 (5): I-III.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Evan. 2006. The Very Best Men: The Daring Early Years of the CIA. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treverton, Gregory. 1987. Covert Action: The Limits of Intervention in the Postwar World. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, Stephen. 2014. “What Really Happened in Congo: The CIA, the Murder of Lumumba, and the Rise of Mobutu.” Foreign Affairs 94 (3): 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Diana. 2011. ‘Untold Stuff About Libyan “Rebels.”’ Fort Morgan Times, 6 September.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krishnan, A. (2018). Endgames and Outcomes. In: Why Paramilitary Operations Fail. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71631-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics