Abstract
Physical violence is an ubiquitous ingredient in the makeup of all human societies. Modern states attempt to control physical violence and to distinguish between desirable and undesirable effects of its use. Therefore they try to tame it by legal and professional norms and rules. However, the domain state/violence is ambiguous. For modern states not only restrict the legal and legitimate use of violence. They also increase the intensity of violent conflicts and wars. The two World Wars stand out as exemplary for this ambiguity. Currently, two developments seem to contradict each other. First, in many parts of the globalizing world the state has been made to forfeit its monopoly on the use of force. Second, democratic societies seem to become increasingly post-heroic, which in turn implies a dismantling of their armed forces. The following chapter critically evaluates these developments and explores their roles in shaping the future in terms of the order of violence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aron, R. (2003). Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. New Brunswick. Transactions Publishers [Original edition: Paix et guerre entre les nations, 1962].
Beaufre, A. (1963). Introduction à la stratégie. Paris: Armand Colin.
Beaumont, R. (1995). Small wars: Definitions and dimensions. The Annals, 541, 20–35.
Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. London: Macmillan.
Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2010). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2000). International systems in world history: Remaking the study of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, R. (2004). The breaking of nations. Order and chaos in the twenty-first century. London: Atlantic Books.
Elias, N. (1950). Studies in the genesis of the naval profession. British Journal of Sociology, 1, 291–309.
Feaver, P. (2003). Armed servants: Agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Freedman, L. (2006). The transformation of strategic affairs. The Adelphi Papers, 45, 379.
Gat, A. (2008). War in human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1651, 1968). Leviathan. In C.B. Macpherson (ed.) Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Holsti, K. J. (1996). The state, war, and the state of war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holsti, K. J. (2004). Taming the sovereigns: Institutional change in international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ish-Shalom, P. (2006). Theory as a hermeneutical mechanism: The Democratic-Peace thesis and the politics of democratization. European Journal of International Relations, 12(4), 565–598.
Janowitz, M. (1978). The last half-century: societal change and politics in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kaldor, M. (2013). In defence of new wars. Stability, 2(1:4), 1–16.
Keegan, J. (1995). Die Kultur des Krieges (Original edition: A History of Warfare, 1993). Berlin: Rowohlt Verlag.
Krasner, S. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Martin, M. (2014). An intimate war: An oral history of the Helmand Conflict, 1978–2012. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moskos, C., et al. (2000). Armed forces after the cold war. In C. Moskos, et al. (Eds.), The postmodern military. Armed forces after the cold war (pp. 1–13). New York: Oxford University Press.
Münkler, H. (2005). The new wars. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rahbek-Clemmensen, J., et al. (2012). Conceptualizing the civil-military gap: A research note. Armed Forces and Society, 38(1), 669–678.
Ruffa, C., et al. (2013). Soldiers drawn into politics? Civil-military relations, hybrid military spaces and the future of interventions. In G. Kümmel & B. Giegerich (Eds.), The armed forces: Towards a post-interventionist era? (pp. 29–40). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Simpson, E. (2012). War from the ground up: Twenty-first-century combat as politics. London: Hurst & Cie.
Smith, R. (2007). The utility of force. The art of war in the modern world. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Strachan, H. (2003). The civil-military ‘gap’ in Britain. Journal of Strategic Studies, 26(2), 43–63.
Strachan, H. (2013). The direction of war: Contemporary strategy in historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Creveld, M. (1991). The transformation of war. New York: The Free Press.
van Creveld, M. (1999). The Rise and Fall of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vennesson, P. (2003). Civil-military relations in France: Is there a gap? Journal of Strategic Studies, 26(2), 29–42.
von Bredow, W. (1997). Global street workers? War and the armed forces in a globalizing world. Defense Analysis, 13(2), 169–180.
von Bredow, W. (2015). Sicherheit, Sicherheitspolitik und Militär: Deutschland seit der Vereinigung. Wiesbaden: Springer.
von Clausewitz, C. (1832, 1989). On war. [M. Howard & P. Paret. Indexed Edition, (ed.), Trans.]. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: International relations and political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waltz, K. (1999). Nuclear myths and political realities. In R. A. Art & K. Waltz (Eds.), The use of force military power and international politics (pp. 95–110). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von Bredow, W. (2018). The Order of Violence. Norms and Rules of Organized Violence and the Civil-Military Paradox. In: Caforio, G., Nuciari, M. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of the Military. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71602-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71602-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71600-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71602-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)