Advertisement

It Happened on Facebook

  • Greti-Iulia Ivana
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Relational Sociology book series (PSRS)

Abstract

This chapter addresses the issues derived from the fact that Facebook users are not present in the same physical space and time and also from the fact that they are communicating through the means provided by this social networking platform. Focusing on the options available to users and limitations created by this setting, Ivana tackles the inherently uncertain directionality of public posts and the shared spatio-temporality of the computer screen. Furthermore, the blurry questions of when exchanges of information and “keeping in touch” on Facebook turn into actual social interactions are also discussed.

References

  1. Bakardjieva, Maria. 2005. Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Barassi, Veronica. 2013. Ethnographic Cartographies: Social Movements, Alternative Media and the Spaces of Networks. Social Movement Studies 12 (1): 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergson, Henri. 1910. Time and Free Will. An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. Trans. F.L. Pogson. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  4. boyd, danah, and Nicole B. Ellison. 2007. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bucher, Taina. 2012. Want to be on the Top? Algorithmic Power and the Threat of Invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society 14 (7): 1164–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2017. The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20 (1): 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chauhan, G.S., and T. Shukla. 2016. Social Media Advertising and Public Awareness: Touching the LGBT Chord! Journal of International Women’s Studies 18 (1): 145–155.Google Scholar
  8. Christiansen, Martha Sidury. 2017. Creating a Unique Transnational Place: Deterritorialized Discourse and the Blending of Time and Space in Online Social Media. Written Communication 34 (2): 135–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Couldry, Nick. 2008. Mediatization or Mediation? Alternative Understandings of the Emergent Space of Digital Storytelling. New Media & Society 10 (3): 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimmick, John, and A.B. Albarran. 1994. The Role of Gratification Opportunities in Determining Media Preference. Mass Communication Review 21: 223–235.Google Scholar
  11. Ellison, Nicole B., Cliff Lampe, and Charles Steinfield. 2009. Social Network Sites and Society: Current Trends and Future Possibilities. Interactions 16 (1): 6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garcia, Angela Cora, and Jennifer Baker Jacobs. 1999. The Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding the Turn-Taking System in Quasi-Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32 (4): 337–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia Gomez, Antonio. 2010. Disembodiment and Cyberspace: Gendered Discourses in Female Teenagers’ Personal Information Disclosure. Discourse and Society 21 (2): 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansson, Mats G. 2008. The Private Sphere. An Emotional Territory and Its Agent. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Hepp, Andreas. 2013. The Communicative Figurations of Mediatized Worlds: Mediatization Research in Times of the ‘mediation of everything’. European Journal of Communication 28 (6): 615–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivana, Greti-Iulia. 2016. Face and the Dynamics of Its Construction: A Relational and Multilayered Perspective. Symbolic Interaction 39 (1): 106–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnston, Hank. 2009. Culture, Social Movement and Protest. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Kang, Seok. 2007. Disembodiment in Online Social Interaction: Impact of Online Chat on Social Support and Psychosocial Well-being. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10 (3): 475–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaun, Annee, and Fredrik Stiernstedt. 2014. Facebook Time: Technological and Institutional Affordances for Media Memories. New Media & Society 16 (7): 1154–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knautz, Kathrin, and Katsiaryna Baran. 2016. Facets of Facebook: Use and Users. Hawthorne, NJ: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ledbetter, Andrew. 2009. Measuring Online Communication Attitude: Instrument Development and Validation. Communication Monographs 76 (4): 463–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McAndrew, Francis T., and Hye Sun Jeong. 2012. Who Does What on Facebook? Age, Sex, and Relationship Status as Predictors of Facebook Use. Computers in Human Behavior 28 (6): 2359–2365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, Daniel, and Don Slater. 2000. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Pauwels, Luc. 2005. Websites as Visual and Multimodal Cultural Expressions: Opportunities and Issues of Online Hybrid Media Research. Media, Culture & Society 27 (4): 604–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ralon, Laureano, and Marcelo Vieta. 2011. McLuhan and Phenomenology. Explorations in Media Ecology 10 (3–4): 185–206.Google Scholar
  27. Rodogno, Raffaele. 2012. Personal Identity Online. Philosophy and Technology 25 (3): 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schütz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Schwartz, Ori. 2011. Who Moved My Conversation? Instant Messaging, Intertextuality and New Regimes of Intimacy and Truth. Media Culture & Society 33 (1): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwartz, Raz, and Germaine Halegoua. 2015. The Spatial Self: Location-based Identity Performance on Social Media. New Media & Society 17 (10): 1643–1660.Google Scholar
  31. Silverstone, Roger. 2002. Complicity and Collusion in the Mediation of Everyday Life. New Literary History 33 (4): 761–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tufekci, Zeynep. 2015. Algorithmic Harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent Challenges of Computational Agency. Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law 13: 203–445.Google Scholar
  33. van Doorn, Niels. 2011. Digital Spaces, Material Traces: How Matter Comes to Matter in Online Performances of Gender, Sexuality and Embodiment. Media, Culture & Society 33 (4): 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wegerif, Rupert. 2013. Dialogic: Education for the Internet Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Young, Garry, and Monica T. Whitty. 2010. In Search of the Cartesian Self: Intentional Disembodiment within 21st Century Communication. Theory & Psychology 20 (2): 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhao, Shanyang. 2004. Consociated Contemporaries as an Emergent Realm of the Lifeworld: Extending Schütz’s Phenomenological Analysis to Cyberspace. Human Studies 27 (1): 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 2005. The Digital Self: Through the Looking Glass of Telecopresent Others. Symbolic Interaction 28 (3): 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2007. Internet and the Lifeworld: Updating Schütz Theory of Mutual Knowledge. Information, Technology & People 20 (5): 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greti-Iulia Ivana
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations