Green Supply Chain Design and Planning: The Importance of Decision Integration in Optimization Models

  • Bruna Mota
  • Ana Carvalho
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
  • Ana Barbosa Póvoa
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 223)


Sustainability is more than ever a central concern when deciding a company’s strategy. Stakeholders are continuously pressuring industries to further reduce their environmental impact. In order to achieve that, it is imperative to look for solutions across all of the company’s operations adopting a supply chain view. However, supply chains’ complexity makes this a challenging task. Analysing the sustainability of such complex systems requires the use of capable tools as are optimization models. Several of these models can be found in the literature, mostly focusing on specific issues or specific decisions in the supply chain. Therefore, a research gap is found in models capable of handling a wider variety of decisions. With this work a mixed integer linear programming model is used to demonstrate the impact of including more or less options/decisions on design and planning decisions, and on the environmental performance of a supply chain. A case-study based on a Portuguese pulp and paper company is analysed. The results obtained for different scenarios are examined.


Supply chain Optimization Sustainability Decision integration Life cycle assessment 



This work was partially supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through the projects PTDC/EMS-SIS/1982/2012, MITP-TB/PFM/0005/2013, UID/MAT/00297/2013, and grants SFRH/BD/51947/2012 and SFRH/BSAB/128453/2017.


  1. 1.
    T. Boukherroub, A. Ruiz, A. Guinet, J. Fondrevelle, An integrated approach for sustainable supply chain planning. Comput. Oper. Res. 54, 180–194 (2015)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Brandenburg, K. Govindan, J. Sarkis, S. Seuring, Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: developments and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233(2), 299–312 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Eskandarpour, P. Dejax, J. Miemczyk, O. Péton, Sustainable supply chain network design: an optimization-oriented review. Omega 54, 11–32 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Goedkoop, R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, A. De Schryver, J. Struijs, R. Van Zelm, Recipe 2008. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, 1, 2009Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Mavrotas, Effective implementation of the \(\varepsilon \)-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 213(2), 455–465 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Mota, M.I. Gomes, A. Carvalho, A.P. Barbosa-Povoa, Sustainable supply chains: an integrated modeling approach under uncertainty. Omega (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Taticchi, P. Garengo, S.S. Nudurupati, F. Tonelli, R. Pasqualino, A review of decision-support tools and performance measurement and sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(21), 6473–6494 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruna Mota
    • 1
  • Ana Carvalho
    • 1
  • Maria Isabel Gomes
    • 2
  • Ana Barbosa Póvoa
    • 1
  1. 1.CEG-ISTUniversity of LisbonLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.CMA-FCTNova Universtity of LisbonCaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations