Skip to main content

Spine Growth Assessment of Growth-Friendly Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 875 Accesses

Abstract

Spinal growth involves a myriad of constantly evolving anatomical, biological, and mechanical factors that should be evaluated in detail when treating a child with a spine pathology. Orthopedic surgeons must be aware of the different tools and guidelines available to treat a patient with a skeletally immature spine. Various authors have published techniques to evaluate and estimate the growth of the spine and assess the effect of surgery according to different parameters such as age, pelvic measurements, and chest dimensions. More recent literature reports the effect of growth-friendly surgery in relationship with the sagittal spine length and the true spine length in three dimensions. This chapter presents the case of a 6-year-old boy with neurofibromatosis who was treated with a growth-friendly surgery according to contemporary principles and techniques of spinal deformity evaluation and management in the skeletally immature population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Williams BA, Matsumoto H, McCalla DJ, Akbarnia BA, Blakemore LC, Betz RR, et al. Development and initial validation of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS). J Bone Joint Surg. 2014;96(16):1359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Skaggs DL, Guillaume T, El-Hawary R. Early onset scoliosis consensus statement, SRS Growing Spine Committee. Spine Deform. 2015;3(2):107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell RM Jr, Smith MD, Mayes TC, Mangos JA, Willey-Courand DB, Kose N, et al. The characteristics of thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(3):399–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomez JA, Lee JK, Kim PD, Roye DP, Vitale MG. “Growth friendly” spine surgery: management options for the young child with scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:722–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Skaggs DL, Akbarnia BA, Flynn JM, Myung KS, Sponseller PD, Vitale MG, Chest Wall and Spine Deformity Study Group, Growing Spine Study Group, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, Scoliosis Research Society Growing Spine Study Committee. A classification of growth friendly spine implants. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(3):260–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell RM. Operative strategies for thoracic insufficiency syndrome by vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib expansion thoracoplasty. Oper Tech Orthop. 2005;15:315–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell RM, Smith MD, Hell-Vocke AK. Expansion thoracoplasty: the surgical technique of opening wedge thoracotomy, surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(Suppl. 1):51–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crawford AH. Pitfalls of spinal deformities associated with neurofibromatosis in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;245:29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dimeglio A, Bonnel F. Le rachis en croissance. Paris: Springer; 1990. p. 392–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dimeglio A. Growth of the spine before age 5 years. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1993;1:102–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gold M, Dombek M, Miller PE, Emans JB, Glotzbecker MP. Prediction of thoracic dimensions and spine length on the basis of individual pelvic dimensions. Spine. 2013;1:74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Larsen W. Human embryology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gammill LS, Bronner-Fraser M. Neural crest specification: migration into genomics. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:795–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dede O, Demirkiran G, Buyukdogan K, Olgun ZD, Akpinar E, Yazici M. Growth of the thoracic spine re-visited: is the Dimeglio data accurate? Spine Deform. 2015;3(6):613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karol LA, Johnston C, Mladenov K, Schochet P, Walters P, Browne RH. Pulmonary function following early thoracic fusion in non-neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90(6):1272–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sankar WN, Skaggs DL, Yazici M, Johnston CE, Shah S, Javidan P, et al. Lengthening of dual growing rods and the law of diminishing returns. Spine. 2011;36(10):806–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fletcher ND, McClung A, Rathjen KE, Denning JR, Browne R, Johnston CE. Serial casting as a delay tactic in the treatment of moderate-to-severe early-onsetscoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(7):664–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Hawary R, Samdani A, Wade J, Smith M, Heflin JA, Klatt JW, et al. Children’s spine study group, rib-based distraction surgery maintains total spine growth. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(8):841–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spurway AJ, Chukwunyerenwa CK, Kishta WE, Hurry JK, El-Hawary R. Sagittal spine length measurement: a novel technique to assess growth of the spine. Spine Deform. 2016;4(5):331–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spurway AJ, Hurry JK, Gauthier L, Orlik B, Chukwunyerenwa CK, Kishta WE, et al. Three dimensional true Spine length: a novel technique for assessing the outcomes of scoliosis surgery. J Paediatr Orthop. 2017;37(8):e631–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Charles YP, Marcoul A, Schaeffer M, Canavese F, Diméglio A. Three-dimensional and volumetric thoracic growth in children with moderate idiopathic scoliosis compared with normal. J Paediatr Orthop B. 2017;26:227–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peters J, Bisirri E, Campbell RM, Balasubramanian S. Age-related shape characterization of the pediatric thoracic Spine using generalized procrustes analysis. Presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of Scoliosis Research Society, Minneapolis, MN, Sept 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sanders JO, Karbach L, Osinski T, Liu R, Qiu X, Cooperman D. Normal human Spine growth and prediction of final spine height developed from a longitudinal cohort of children followed through their growth until completion. Presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of Scoliosis Research Society, Minneapolis, MN, Sept 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tremblay L, Tohmé P, Roy-Beaudry M, Beauséjour M, Labelle H, Parent S. Spinal growth in normal children between 3 and 11 years old using 3D reconstruction: a longitudinal study. Presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of Scoliosis Research Society, Minneapolis, MN, Sept 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron El-Hawary MD, MSc, FRCS(C) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

El-Hawary, R., Brassard, F. (2018). Spine Growth Assessment of Growth-Friendly Surgery. In: El-Hawary, R., Eberson, C. (eds) Early Onset Scoliosis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71580-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71580-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71579-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71580-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics