Abstract
For decades, women have undergone breast implant surgery either for health or aesthetic reasons. Some adverse effects have made their history full of events, showing the complex factors involved in the interaction of the device with the human body. Understanding the adverse outcomes is a key factor to improve the breast implants. This will help to increase the safety of the procedure. It is also important to stress some new concerns as well as the lack of evidence of involvement on specific long-term health outcomes in women with silicone gel breast implants, such as cancer; connective tissue, rheumatologic, and autoimmune diseases; neurologic diseases; reproductive issues, including lactation; offspring issues; and mental health issues. The development of the National Breast Implant Registry (NBIR), since 2012 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons in collaboration with the FDA was a huge step to understand these issues. In this database, it is possible to collect and tracks important information on patients and devices, maximizing data extraction from clinical cohorts and directing more meaningful analyses. Researchers could finally obtain clarification of the long-term health outcomes of silicone gel breast implants.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ISAPS (2014) International survey on aesthetic. Global Statistic. http://www.isaps.org/news/isaps-global-statistics. Accessed 11 Feb 2016
Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2009) The evolution of breast implants. Clin Plast Surg 36(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2008.08.001
Bondurant S, Ernster V, Herdman R (2005) Safety of silicone breast implants. National Academies, Washington, pp 1–559
Food and Drug Administration (1992) (FDA), Special report. The basis of the FDA´s decision on breast implants. The New England Journal of Medicine-. New Engl J Med 326(25):1713–1715
Yu LT, La Torre G, Marotta J et al (1996) In vitro measurement of silicone bleed from breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:756–764
Siemionow MZ, Marita ME (2010) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Springer, London. ISBN 978-1-84882-512-3
Phillips JW, de Camara DL, Lockwood MD et al (1996) Strength of silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(6):1215–1225
Goldberg EP, Widenhouse C, Marotta J et al (1997) Failure of silicone gel breast implants: analysis of literature data for 1652 explanted prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:281–284
Brandon HJ, Jerina KL, Wolf CJ (2012) Retrieval and analysis of breast implants emphasizing strength, durability, and failure mechanisms. Woodhead Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84569-799-0.50007-4
Cunningham B, (2007) The mentor core study on silicone memory gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(9S–29S):30–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286574.88752.04
Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A et al (2007) Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(8S–16S):17–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286580.93214
Barr S, Bayat A (2011) Breast implant surface development: perspectives on development and manufacture. Aesthet Surg J 31:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X10390921
Rohrich RJ, Adams WP, Beran SJ et al (1998) An analysis of silicone gel-filled breast implants: diagnosis and failure rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(7):2304–2308
Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (2013) The safety of PIP silicone breast implants. http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_043.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2013
Wazir U, Kasem A, Mokbel K (2015) The clinical implications of poly implant prothèse breast implants: an overview. Arch Plast Surg 42:4–10. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.1.4
Santos DC, Barroso ML, Gomes N et al (2015) PIP breast implant rupture—A retrospective study from Portugal. Eur J Plast Surg 38(4):301–308
Swarts E, Kop AM, Nilasaroya A et al (2013) Rupture of poly implant prothèse silicone breast implants: an implant retrieval study. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(4):480e–489e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818a00
Grigg M, Bondurant S, Ernster VL et al (2000) Information for women about the safety of silicone breast implants. National Academy Press, Washington D.C. ISBN 0-309-52021-5
Grewal NS, Fisher J (2013) Why do patients seek revisionary breast surgery? Aesthet Surg J 33(2):237–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X12472693
Minami E, Koh IH, Ferreira JC et al (2006) The composition and behavior of capsules around smooth and textured breast implants in pigs. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(4):874–884. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000240878.24213.b7
Liu X, Zhou L, Pan F et al (2015) Comparison of the post-operative incidence rate of capsular contracture among different breast implants: a cumulative meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 10(2):e0116071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116071
Brody GS, Long JN, Talavera F (2016) Silicone Breast Implant Safety and Efficacy. Medscape. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1275451-overview#showall. Accessed 9 Feb 2016
Fisher J, Handel N (2014) Problems in breast surgery a repair manual. CRS Press, Taylor and Fraqncis Group. ISBN 13:978-1-4822-6093
Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K (2015) Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg 42(5):453–532. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.532
Arquero PS, Zanata FC, Ferreira LM et al (2015) Capsular weakness around breast implant: a non-recognized complication. World J Plast Surg 4(2):168–174
Roxo AC, Nahas FX, Salin R et al (2016) Volumetric evaluation of the mammary gland and pectoralis major muscle following subglandular and submuscular breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(1):62–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001874
Potter EH, Rohrich R, Bolden K (2013) The role of silicone granulomas in recurrent capsular contracture: a review of the literature and an approach to management. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(6):888e–895e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd642
Austad ED (2002) Breast implant-related silicone granulomas: the literature and the litigation. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1724–1732
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2006) Guidance for industry and FDA Staff. Saline, Silicone Gel, and Alternative Breast Implants. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Balk EM, Earley A, Avendano EA, Raman G (2016) Long-term health outcomes in women with silicone gel breast implants: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 164(3):164–175. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1169
TGA (2013) PIP breast implants: Update on TGA testing of PIP breast implants. http://www.tga.gov.au/alert/pip-breast-implants-update-tga-testing-pip-breast-implants. Accessed 10 Mar 2013
Ramião NG, Martins PS, Rynkevic R et al (2016) Biomechanical properties of breast tissue, a state-of-the-art review. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15(5):1307–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-016-0763-8
Daniels AU (2012) Silicone breast implant materials. Swiss Med Wkly 142:w136
Keogh SB (2012) Poly Implant Prothese (PIP) breast implants: final report of the working group. Leeds, UK: Department of Health, NHS Medical Directorate; 2012. Report No. 17744
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramião, N. et al. (2018). Breast Implants: Far Beyond Just Aesthetic Surgery. In: Brandão, S., Da Roza, T., Ramos, I., Mascarenhas, T. (eds) Women's Health and Biomechanics. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71574-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71574-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71573-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71574-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)