Skip to main content

Abstract

Zero tolerance in schools is a philosophical approach to discipline that generally mandates predetermined punitive consequences—most commonly expulsion and suspension—for violations of particular school rules, regardless of circumstances or situational context (Stinchcomb et al. 2006; Teske 2011), with the apparent intent to deter and prevent undesirable behavior (APA Zero Tolerance Task Force 2008; Mallett 2016). In the USA, these policies can be traced to the federal Gun-Free School Act of 1994, which sought to restrict weapons in schools, but expanded to include non-weapon related and non-violent behaviors. Now used in most schools in all fifty USA states, this disciplinary orientation has also expanded to a number of additional countries, including Britain and Canada. While zero tolerance has been widely criticized for having unintended consequences, such as alarming disparities that negatively affect poor and minority students, original supporters advocated greater fairness toward students, more consistent discipline, and violence prevention (Gorman and Pauken 2003; Henault 2001). Research, however, has yet to produce any evidence that zero tolerance policies have achieved these objectives. In fact, ample evidence suggests wide-ranging harm to students, schools, and communities. In this chapter, we describe and evaluate these aspects of zero tolerance policies in schools and offer recommendations for productive and thoughtful disciplinary alternatives. Finally, we make some suggestions for future research that may enhance our understanding of the impact of zero tolerance in schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • APA Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools?: An evidentiary review and recommendations. The American Psychologist, 63(9), 853–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccaria, C. (2009). On crimes and punishments and other writings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beger, R. R. (2002). Expansion of police power in public schools and the vanishing rights of students. Social Justice, 29(87), 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. J., Butler, B. R., & Smith, D. (2015). Challenging middle-class notions of femininity: The cause of black females’ disproportionate suspension rates. In D. J. Losen (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 75–88). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccanfuso, C., & Kuhfeld, M. (2011). Multiple responses, promising results: Evidence-based, nonpunitive alternatives to zero tolerance. Child Trends. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/alternatives-to-zero-tolerance.pdf

  • Brown, L. H., & Beckett, K. S. (2006). The role of the school district in student discipline: Building consensus in Cincinnati. The Urban Review, 38(3), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casella, R. (2003). Zero tolerance policy in schools: Rationale, consequences, and alternatives. Teachers College Record, 105(5), 872–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. M. (2016, November 2). Rethinking school discipline. The American Prospect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I., & Bialystok, E. (2006). Cognition through the lifespan: Mechanisms of change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(3), 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crews, F., He, J., & Hodge, C. (2007). Adolescent cortical development: A critical period of vulnerability for addiction. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 86(2), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: Links to social-psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 610–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, F. C. (2015). Zero tolerance school discipline: Implications for schools, leaders, and students. Dissertation, Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabelo, T., Thompson, M. D., Plotkin, M., Carmichael, D., Marchbanks, M. P., III, & Booth, E. A. (2011). Breaking schools’ rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. A. (2000). Bad boys. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, N. M. (2008). Should there be zero tolerance for zero tolerance school discipline policies? Education Law Journal, 18(2), 103–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardella, J. H. (2015). Restorative practices for school administrators considering implementation. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2003). Zero tolerance, domestic militarization, and the war against youth. Social Justice, 30(2), 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, T. (2012). Keeping kids in schools: Restorative justice, punitive discipline, and the school to prison pipeline. Journal of Law & Education, 41(2), 281–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, K., & Pauken, P. (2003). The ethics of zero tolerance. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Payne, A. A., & Gottfredson, N. (2005). School climate predictors of school disorder: Results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(4), 412–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Adams, K., & Sinclair, B. (2004). Report on the implementation of the Gun-Free Schools Act in the states and outlying areas: School year 2001–2002. Final Report. Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Cornell, D. (2009). ‘Tolerating’ adolescent needs: Moving beyond zero tolerance policies in high school. Theory into Practice, 48(2), 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Weinstein, R. S. (2008). The discipline gap and African Americans: Defiance or cooperation in the high school classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 455–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., Bell, J., & Pollock, M. (2014, March). How educators can eradicate disparities in school discipline: A briefing paper on school-based interventions. Discipline Disparities Series: Interventions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A., Cornell, D., & Lovegrove, P. (2015). Principal attitudes regarding zero tolerance and racial disparities in school suspensions. Psychology in the Schools, 52(5), 489–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henault, C. (2001). Zero tolerance in schools. Journal of Law and Education, 30, 547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, S. (2009). School violence beyond columbine: A complex problem in need of an interdisciplinary analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(9), 1246–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S. (2014). Zero benefit estimating the effect of zero tolerance discipline polices on racial disparities in school discipline. Educational Policy, 28(1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, N., Guckenburg, S., Persson, H., Fronius, T., & Petrosino, A. (2015). What further research is needed on restorative justice in schools? San Francisco: WestEd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (2013). #Zerotolerance #KeepingupwiththeTimes: How federal zero tolerance policies failed to promote educational success, deter juvenile legal consequences, and confront new social media concerns in public schools. Journal of Law and Education, 42, 739–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jull, S. (2000). Youth violence, schools, and the management question: A discussion of zero tolerance and equity in public schooling. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 17, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang-Brown, J., Trone, J., Fratello, J., & Daftary-Kapur, T. (2013). A generation later: What we’ve learned about zero tolerance in schools. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, D. R., & Frank, O. (2015). Anxiously awaiting the future of restorative justice in The United States. Victims & Offenders, 11 (1) (2016), 50–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. M. (1999). How we prevent the prevention of emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 65(4), 448–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, P., Chen, X., Choy, S. P., Peter, K., Ruddy, S. A., Miller, A. K., Fleury, J. K., Chandler, K. A., Planty, M. G., & Rand, M. R. (2001). Indicators of school crime and safety, 2001 (Report no. NCES 2002-113/NCJ-190075). Washington, DC: U.S. Departments of Education and Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. Y., Losen, D. J., & Hewitt, D. T. (2010). The school-to-prison pipeline: Structuring legal reform. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinos, C. M., Panayiotou, G., & Davazoglou, A. M. (2004). Perceived seriousness of pupils’ undesirable behaviours: The student teachers’ perspective. Educational Psychology, 24, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupchik, A. (2010). Homeroom security: School discipline in an age of fear. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kupchik, A. (2016). The real school safety problem: The long-term consequences of harsh school punishment. Oakland: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchik, A., & Ellis, N. (2008). School discipline and security: Fair for all students? Youth & Society, 39(4), 549–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupchik, A., & Monahan, T. (2006). The new American school: Preparation for post-industrial discipline. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(5), 617–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupchik, A., & Ward, G. (2014). Race, poverty, and exclusionary school security: An empirical analysis of U.S. elementary, middle, and high schools. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 12(4), 332–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasnover, S. (2015). The early of effects of the removal of willful defiance from the discipline policy at urban high schools. Dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losen, D. J., Ee, J., Hodson, C., & Martinez, T. E. (2015). Disturbing inequities: Exploring the relationship between racial disparities in special education identification and discipline. In D. J. Losen (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 89–106). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, C. A. (2016). The school-to-prison pipeline: A critical review of the punitive paradigm shift. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33(1), 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCluskey, G., Lloyd, G., Kane, J., Riddell, S., Stead, J., & Weedon, E. (2008). Can restorative practices in schools make a difference? Educational Review, 60(4), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Limber, S. P., Cunningham, P., Osgood, D. W., Chambers, J., Flerx, V., Henggeler, S., & Nation, M. (1998). Violence among rural youth: Final report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Deliquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W. (2012). Race, gender, and the “school to prison pipeline”: Expanding our discussion to include black girls. African American Policy Forum. Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/monique_morris/2/

  • Morrison, B. (2007). Restoring safe school communities: A whole school response to bullying, violence and alienation. Leichhardt: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B. E., & Vaandering, D. (2012). Restorative justice: Pedagogy, praxis, and discipline. Journal of School Violence, 11(2), 138–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B., Blood, P., & Thorsborne, M. (2005). Practicing restorative justice in school communities: Addressing the challenge of culture change. Public Organization Review, 5(4), 335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, G., & Midford, R. (2001). ‘Zero tolerance’ and drug education in Australian schools. Drug and Alcohol Review, 20(1), 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. (2004). An exploration of discipline and suspension data. Journal of Negro Education, 73(4), 408–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noguera, P. (1995). Preventing and producing violence: A critical analysis of responses to school violence. Harvard Educational Review, 65(2), 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noguera, P. A. (2003). Schools, prisons, and social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices. Theory into Practice, 42(4), 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noguera, P. A. (2008). The trouble with black boys…and other reflections on race, equity, and the future of public education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights. (2014). 2011–2012 civil rights data collection definitions. Retrieved from http://ocrdata.ed.gov/Downloads/2011-12_Definitions.doc

  • Payne, A. A. (2016). School climate and school crime: The translation gap between research and policy. Currently Unpublished Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. A., & Welch, K. (2010). Modeling the effects of racial threat on punitive and restorative school discipline practices. Criminology, 48(4), 1019–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. A., & Welch, K. (2015). Restorative justice in schools: The influence of race on restorative discipline. Youth & Society, 47(4), 539–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peguero, A. A., & Shakarkar, Z. (2011). Latino/a student misbehavior and school punishment. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 33, 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penny, M. F. (2015). The use of restorative justice to resolve conflict in schools. Masters Thesis. Chicago: Governors State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, K., Njie, B., Detch, E. R., & Walton, J. (2003). Zero tolerance in Tennessee schools: An update. Nashville: Tennessee State Controller of the Treasury, Office of Educational Accountability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, D. M. (2015). The social structure of criminalized and medicalized school discipline. Sociology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040715587114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, M. (2012, August 7). Suspensions are higher for disabled students, federal data indicate. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich-Shea, A. M., & Fox, J. A. (2014). Zero-tolerance policies. In G. W. Muschert, S. Henry, N. L. Bracy, & A. A. Peguero (Eds.), Responding to school violence: Confronting the columbine effect (pp. 89–104). London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, G., Roland, K., Salinitri, G., & Frey, M. (2010). Measuring the effect of restorative justice practices: Outcomes and contexts. EAF Journal, 21(2), 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocque, M., & Paternoster, R. (2011). Understanding the antecedents of the ‘school-to-jail’ link: The relationship between race and school discipline. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101, 633–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, M. (2013). Dignity, disparity and desistance: Effective restorative justice strategies to plug the ‘school-to-prison pipeline.’ In Center for Civil Rights Remedies National Conference. Closing the School to Research Gap: Research to Remedies Conference. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiraldi, V., & Ziedenberg, J. (2001). Schools and suspensions: Self-reported crime and the growing use of suspensions (Justice Policy Institute Policy Brief). Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonover, B. J. (2009). Zero tolerance discipline policies: The history, implementation, and controversy of zero tolerance policies in student codes of conduct. New York: iUniverse, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W. (2003). Reason for emotion: Reinventing justice with theories, innovations, and research—The American Society of Criminology 2002 presidential address. Criminology, 41, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J. (2014). The failure of zero tolerance. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 22(4), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., & Rausch, M. (2006). School disciplinary systems: Alternatives to suspension and expulsion. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.) Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention. Washington, D.C: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R., & Peterson, R. (1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools? The Phi Delta Kappan, 80(5), 372–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Williams, N. T. (2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(4), 546–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., & Peterson, R. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Source of racial and gender disproportionality in school discipline. The Urban Review, 34(4), 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R., Reynolds, C. R., Graham, S., Sheras, P., Conoley, J. C., & Garcia-Vazquez, E. (2006). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. A Report by the American Psychological Associate Zero Tolerance Task Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C.-G., Rausch, M., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcomb, J. B., Bazemore, G., & Riestenberg, N. (2006). Beyond zero tolerance restoring justice in secondary schools. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, M. D., Silverman, C. J., & Frampton, M. L. (2010). School-based restorative justice as an alternative to zero-tolerance policies: Lessons from West Oakland. Berkeley: Thelton E. Henderson Center for Social Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E., & Rooney, T. (2017). Surveillance futures: Social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young people. New York: Routeledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teske, S. C. (2011). A study of zero tolerance policies in schools: A multi-integrated systems approach to improve outcomes for adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 24(2), 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavrus, F., & Cole, K. M. (2002). “I didn’t do nothin’”: The discursive construction of school suspension. The Urban Review, 34(2), 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, R. R. (2002). Race-ethnicity, social class, and zero-tolerance policies the cultural and structural wars. Education and Urban Society, 35(1), 50–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C. G., & Tobin, T. J. (2011). The relationship between implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) and disciplinary exclusion of students from various ethnic backgrounds with and without disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19(4), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, J., & Losen, D. J. (2003). Defining and redirecting a school-to-prison pipeline. New Directions for Youth Development, 99, 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. (2009). Zero tolerance: Advantages and disadvantages. Research brief. ERIC Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED539007.

  • Wallace, J. M., Jr., Goodkind, S., Wallace, C. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2008). Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline among US high school students: 1991–2005. The Negro Educational Review, 59(1–2), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, I. E., & Erevelles, N. (2004). These deadly times: Reconceptualizing school violence by using critical race theory and disability studies. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, K., & Payne, A. A. (2010). Racial threat and punitive school discipline. Social Problems, 57, 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, K., & Payne, A. A. (2012). Exclusionary school punishment: The effect of racial threat on expulsion and suspension. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, K., & Payne, A. A. (2014). Racial implications of school discipline and crime. In G. W. Muschert, S. Henry, N. L. Bracy, & A. A. Peguero (Eds.), The Columbine effect: Fear and the expansion of school antiviolence policy. Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S.-C., Pink, W., Crain, R., & Moles, O. (1982). Student suspension: A critical reappraisal. The Urban Review, 14, 245–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, H. (2002). Journey to belonging. Restorative Justice: Theoretical Foundations, 21, 24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Welch, K., Payne, A.A. (2018). Zero Tolerance School Policies. In: Deakin, J., Taylor, E., Kupchik, A. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of School Discipline, Surveillance, and Social Control. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71559-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71559-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71558-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71559-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics