Abstract
This chapter suggests that life course events create opportunities for contact with some new types of persons while reducing the accessibility of others, and thereby shape social networks. Examination of General Social Survey data on social networks and informal socializing activity offers considerable support for the perspective set forth. Family-related life course states, particularly marital status, shape contacts with relatives; entering the paid workforce raises the likelihood that confiding networks include workplace colleagues. Some competition across foci of activity is evident, as employed people appear somewhat less apt to draw their confidants from the family or the residential neighborhood, and likewise to have fewer social contacts with neighbors. Suggestive findings indicate that marriage and the presence of children may hold different implications for the social lives of wives/mothers and husbands/fathers.
Author’s Note: A first rendition of the ideas here was presented at the May, 2015 conference “Together Through Time” held at Penn State University. Subsequently they were discussed at colloquia held in CIS Summer Seminars on Sociological and Political Research at the Real Colegio Complutense (August, 2015 and 2016), the Forschungskolloquium Mikrosoziologie at the Institut für Soziologie, Universität Bremen (November, 2015), and the Department of Sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (March, 2016). I appreciate the helpful comments I received from participants in all of these sessions, and from the editors of this volume.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
i.e. those who are separated, divorced, or widowed.
- 2.
- 3.
The wording of the role relation question is: “Here is a list of some of the ways in which people are connected to each other. Some people can be connected to you in more than one way. For example, a man could be your brother and he may belong to your church and be your lawyer. When I read you a name, please tell me all the ways that person is connected to you. How is (NAME) connected to you?” Answer options included spouse, parent, sibling, child, other family, co-worker, member of group, neighbor, friend, advisor, and “other.” Respondents could select more than one answer for each alter; after their initial answer, interviewers probed once for additional connections.
- 4.
Qualitatively similar, but even less pronounced, age differences are found in name generator data about “good friends” collected in the 1988 and 1998 GSSs. Because these studies did not obtain information on network composition, we do not examine them further here.
- 5.
An exception is that visiting bars and taverns rises sharply with age until age 23, represented here using a spline function. The peak age of visiting bars is just above the legal age for alcohol consumption in the United States. For more detailed examination of age patterns in socializing, see Marsden and Srivastava (2012).
References
Alwin, D. F. (2012). Integrating varieties of life course concepts. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(2), 206–220.
Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of Gerontology, 42(5), 519–527.
Balbo, N., & Barban, N. (2014). Does fertility behavior spread among friends? American Sociological Review, 79(3), 412–431.
Bernardi, L., & Klärner, A. (2014). Social networks and fertility. Demographic Research, 30(22), 641–670.
Bidart, C., & Lavenu, D. (2005). Evolutions of personal networks and life events. Social Networks, 27(4), 359–376.
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
Blau, P. M., & Schwartz, J. E. (1984). Cross-cutting social circles: Testing a macrosociological theory of intergroup relations. New York: Academic.
Burt, R.S. (1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks 6(4), 293–339.
Burt, R. S. (1986). A note on sociometric order in the general social survey network data. Social Networks, 8(2), 149–174.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chua, V. (2013). Categorical sources of varieties of network inequalities. Social Science Research, 42(5), 1236–1253.
Chua, V., Mathews, M., & Loh, Y. (2016). Social capital in Singapore: Gender differences, ethnic hierarchies, and their intersection. Social Networks, 47, 138–150.
Cornwell, B., Laumann, E. O., & Schumm, L. P. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 185–203.
Crossley, N., Bellotti, E., Edwards, G., Everett, M. G., Koskinen, J., & Tranmer, M. (2015). Social network analysis for ego-nets. London: Sage.
Degenne, A., & Lebeaux, M. (2005). The dynamics of personal networks at the time of entry into adult life. Social Networks, 27(4), 337–358.
Elder, G. H. (1985). Perspectives on the life course. In G. H. J. Elder (Ed.), Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968–1980 (pp. 23–49). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Elder, G. H. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15.
Elder, G. H. (1995). The life course paradigm: Social change and individual development. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 101–139). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035.
Fischer, C. S. (1977). Perspectives on community and personal relations. In C. S. Fischer, R. M. Jackson, C. A. Stueve, K. Gerson, & L. M. Jones (Eds.), Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting (pp. 1–16). New York: Free Press.
Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fischer, C. S. (2009). The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact? American Sociological Review, 74(4), 657–669.
Fischer, C. S., & Oliker, S. J. (1983). A research note on friendship, gender, and the life cycle. Social Forces, 62(1), 124–133.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Hammer, M., Gutwirth, L., & Phillips, S. L. (1982). Parenthood and social networks. Social Science & Medicine, 16(24), 2091–2100.
Heise, D. R. (1972). Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 1(2), 147–173.
Hurlbert, J. S., & Acock, A. C. (1990). The effects of marital status on the form and composition of social networks. Social Science Quarterly, 71(1), 163–174.
Jonczyk, C. D., Lee, Y. G., Galunic, C. D., & Bensaou, B. M. (2016). Relational changes during role transitions: The interplay of efficiency and cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 956–982.
Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. In Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 253–286). New York: Academic.
Kalmijn, M. (2003). Shared friendship networks and the life course: An analysis of survey data on married and cohabiting couples. Social Networks, 25(3), 231–249.
Kalmijn, M. (2012). Longitudinal analyses of the effects of age, marriage, and parenthood on social contacts and support. Advances in Life Course Research, 17(4), 177–190.
Lois, D. (2016). Types of social networks and the transition to parenthood. Demographic Research, 34(23), 657–688.
Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122–131.
Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network diversity, substructures, and opportunities for contact. In C. Calhoun, M. Meyer, & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Structures of power and constraint: Papers in honor of Peter M. Blau (pp. 397–410). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marsden, P. V., & Smith, T. W. (2012). Appendix: The general social survey project. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Social trends in American life: Findings from the general social survey since 1972 (pp. 369–378). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Marsden, P. V., & Srivastava, S. B. (2012). Trends in informal social participation: 1974–2008. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Social trends in American life: Findings from the general social survey since 1972 (pp. 240–263). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Marshall, V. W., & Mueller, M. M. (2003). Theoretical roots of the life-course perspective. In Social dynamics of the life course: Transitions, institutions, and interrelations (pp. 3–32). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
McCannell, K. (1988). Social networks and the transition to motherhood. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Families and social networks (pp. 83–106). Beverly Hills: Sage.
McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1982). Women and weak ties: Differences by sex in the size of voluntary organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 87(4), 883–904.
Moen, P. (2001). The gendered life course. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (5th ed.). New York: Academic.
Mollenhorst, G., Volker, B., & Flap, H. (2014). Changes in personal relationships: How social contexts affect the emergence and discontinuation of relationships. Social Networks, 37, 65–80.
Moore, G. (1990). Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks. American Sociological Review, 55(5), 726–735.
Morgan, D. L., Neal, M. B., & Carder, P. (1997). The stability of core and peripheral networks over time. Social Networks, 19(1), 9–25.
Munch, A., McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1997). Gender, children, and social contact: The effects of childrearing for men and women. American Sociological Review, 62(4), 509–520.
Paik, A., & Sanchagrin, K. (2013). Social isolation in America: An artifact. American Sociological Review, 78(3), 339–360.
Sarkisian, N., & Gerstel, N. (2016). Does singlehood isolate or integrate? Examining the link between marital status and ties to kin, friends, and neighbors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(3), 361–384.
Small, M. L. (2009). Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stueve, C. A., & Gerson, K. (1977). Personal relations across the life-cycle. In C. S. Fischer, R. M. Jackson, C. A. Stueve, K. Gerson, & L. M. Jones (Eds.), Networks and Places: Social Relations in the Urban Setting (pp. 79–98). New York: Free Press.
Verbrugge, L. M. (1977). The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56(2), 576–597.
Wellman, B., Wong, R. Y., Tindall, D., & Nazer, N. (1997). A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities. Social Networks, 19(1), 27–50.
Whitt, H. P. (1986). The sheaf coefficient: A simplified and expanded approach. Social Science Research, 15(2), 174–189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marsden, P.V. (2018). Life Course Events and Network Composition. In: Alwin, D., Felmlee, D., Kreager, D. (eds) Social Networks and the Life Course. Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71543-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71544-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)