Decreating Creativity Education: Yet to Be Created

  • Nadine M. Kalin
Chapter
Part of the Creativity, Education and the Arts book series (CEA)

Abstract

In the concluding chapter, I contrast creative destruction that runs capitalist economies with Agamben’s notion of decreation. I explore how educators, artists, and activists might reanimate their roles as creatives in this time through starving neoliberalized, entrepreneurialized, and economized forms of creativity. Proposed are alternative modes of decreation where productivity, innovation, and praxis are denied their pre-set ends toward a state of exception that allows us to begin anew in reimaging what creativity education might have been.

Keywords

Creativity Neoliberalism Creative destruction Decreation Education 

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1999). Bartleby, or on contingency. In Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy (D. Heller-Roazen, Ed. & Trans.) (pp. 243–271). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agamben, G. (2002). Difference and repetition: On Guy Debord’s films (B. Holmes, Trans.) In T. McDonough (Ed.), Guy Debord and the Situationist International: Texts and documents (pp. 313–319). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Biesta, G. (2013). Time out: Can education do and be done without time? In T. Szkudlarek (Ed.), Education and the political: New theoretical articulations (pp. 75–88). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers and Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach (Revised ed.). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. (2007). Psyche: Inventions of the other: Volume 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Original work published in 1987).Google Scholar
  7. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Harvie, J. (2013). Fair play: Art, performance and neoliberalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holmes, B. (2013). Crisis theory for complex societies. In T. Bazzichelli & G. Cox (Eds.), Disrupting business: Art and activism in times of financial crisis (pp. 199–225). Brooklyn: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
  10. jagodzinski, j. (2015). The challenges of art education in designer capitalism: Collaborative practices in the (new media) arts. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34(3), 282–295.Google Scholar
  11. Kalin, N. M. (2012). (de)Fending art education through the pedagogical turn. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 32, 42–55.Google Scholar
  12. Kalin, N. M. (2013). Hosting the occupation of art education as aporia. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 33, 105–117.Google Scholar
  13. Kalin, N. M., & Barney, D. T. (2014a). Hunting for monsters: Visual arts curriculum as agonistic inquiry. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 33(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalin, N. M., & Barney, D. T. (2014b). Inoperative art education. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 34, 63–75.Google Scholar
  15. De Lissovoy, N. (2015). Education and emancipation in the neoliberal era: Being, teaching, and power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. McRobbie, A. (2016). Be creative: Making a living in the new culture industries. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Robinson, K. (2016). Creative schools. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. Rudd, T., & Goodson, I. F. (2017). Negotiating neoliberalism. Boston: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saltman, K. J. (2014). The politics of education: A critical introduction. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Schumpeter, J. A. (2003). Capitalism, socialism & democracy. New York: Routledge. (Original work published in 1943).Google Scholar
  21. Stiegler, B. (2015). State of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the 21st century (D. Ross, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Vishmidt, M. (2013). Mimesis of the hardened and alienated: Social practice as business model. In T. Bazzichelli & G. Cox (Eds.), Disrupting business: Art and activism in times of financial crisis (pp. 39–57). Brooklyn: AUTONOMEDIA.Google Scholar
  23. Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadine M. Kalin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Art Education and Art HistoryUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations