Governmentality and Post-Fordist Art Education

  • Nadine M. Kalin
Chapter
Part of the Creativity, Education and the Arts book series (CEA)

Abstract

This chapter bears down on neoliberal ideology’s influence on contemporary conceptions of creativity and its education. Under the present post-Fordist system of economic production, artists—with their drive to innovate, flexible production practices, and tolerance for precarity—are being upheld as ideal workers. The resulting requirements of immaterial labor have obliged the restructuring of education through forms of neoliberal governmentality that set about instilling specific values and urgencies manifesting in the governmentalization of learning and economization of education. In my consideration of the convergence of these pressures I focus on how the Partnership for 21st Century Skills mandates the acceleration of post-Fordist economic goals for art education through government of self and others that greatly reduces the possibilities for the nurturing of creativity.

Keywords

Creativity Neoliberalism Governmentality Post-Fordism Foucault 

References

  1. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism (3rd ed.). (G. Elliott, Trans.). New York: Verso. (Original work published in 1999).Google Scholar
  2. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Brooklyn: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  3. Center for Cultural Innovation for National Endowment for the Arts. (2016). Creativity connects: Trends and conditions affecting U.S. artists. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/Creativity-Connects-Final-Report.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2017.
  4. De Bruyne, P. (2012). Turbulence in arts paradise some notes on the future of art schools. In P. De Bruyne & P. Gielen (Eds.), Being an artist in post-Fordist times (2nd ed., pp. 147–156). NAi Publishers: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  5. De Peuter, G. (2011). Creative economy and labor precarity: A contested convergence. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 35(4), 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Florida, R. (2008). Who’s your city? How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College De France 1977–1978 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. (Original work published in 2004.)Google Scholar
  10. Gielen, P. (2010). The murmuring of the artistic multitude; Global art, memory and post-Fordism. Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
  11. Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2013). Precarity and cultural work in the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. ONCURATING.org, 1(16), 26–40.Google Scholar
  12. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Maiden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Howes, S. A. (2016, April 21). Artists, the original gig economy workers, have more rights than they think. Retrieved from https://www.arts.gov/partnerships/creativity-connects/report/artists-the-original-gig-economy-workers-more-rights-than-they-think. Accessed 19 Aug 2017.
  15. Kearney, G., & Harris, P. (2013). Supporting the creative industries: The rationale for an exchange of thinking between the art and business schools. International Journal of Education Through Art, 9(3), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial labor. (P. Colilli & E. Emery, Trans.) In M. Hardt & P. Virno (Eds.), Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics (pp. 133–147). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Léger, M. J. (2013). For the de-incapacitation of community art practice. ONCURATING.org, 1(16), 51–57.Google Scholar
  18. Lorey, I. (2006). Governmentality and self-precarization: On the normalization of cultural producers (L. Rosenblatt & D. Fink, Trans.). Transveral. Retrieved from http://eipcp.net/transversal/1106/lorey/en/print. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  19. Martin, S. (2008). Pedagogy of human capital. Mute, 2(8). Retrieved from http://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/pedagogy-human-capital. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  20. McRobbie, A. (2007). The Los Angelisation of London Three short-waves of young people’s micro-economies of culture and creativity in the UK. Transversal. Retrieved from http://eipcp.net/transversal/0207/mcrobbie/en. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  21. McRobbie, A. (2013). “Everyone is creative”: Artists as new economy pioneers? ONCURATING.org, 1(16), 58–61. (Original work published in 2001).Google Scholar
  22. Ozgun, A. (2011). Creative industries: Neo-liberalism as mass deception. In M. J. Léger (Ed.), Culture and contestation in the new century (pp. 106–124). Chicago: Intellect.Google Scholar
  23. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_framework_0515.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  24. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (n.d.). 21st century skills map. The arts. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_arts_map_final.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  25. Penzin, A. (2010). The Soviets of the multitude: On collectivity and collective work. Mediations, 25(1), 81–92.Google Scholar
  26. Pongratz, L. A. (2006). Voluntary self-control: Education reform as a governmental strategy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Relyea, L. (2013). Your everyday art world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Simons, M. (2006). Learning as investment: Notes on governmentality and biopolitics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 523–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008). The governmentalization of learning and the assemblage of a learning apparatus. Educational Theory, 58(4), 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tepper, S. J. (2016, March 31). What does it mean to sustain a career in the gig economy? [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.arts.gov/partnerships/creativity-connects/report/what-does-it-mean-to-sustain-a-career-in-the-gig-economy. Accessed 19 Aug 2017.
  31. Virno, P. (2012). The dismeasure of art. An interview with Paolo Virno/Interviewers S. Lavaert & P. Gielen. In P. Gielen & P. De Bruyne (Eds.), Being an artist in post-Fordist times (2nd ed., pp. 19–46).Google Scholar
  32. Woronkowicz, J. (2016, May 12). Do artists have a competitive edge in the gig economy? [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.arts.gov/partnerships/creativity-connects/report/do-artists-have-a-competitive-edge-in-the-gig-economy. Accessed 19 Aug 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadine M. Kalin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Art Education and Art HistoryUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations